Cascade Siskiyou National Monument, Cascade Siskiyou National Monument
Cascade Siskiyou National Monument Cascade Siskiyou NationalMonument



Cascade Siskiyou National Monument. Cascade National Monument News and Commentary:

OfficialJenny Creek Private Lands Coalition Web Site, Defending Private Property.Private property protection links Cascade Siskiyou National Monument andother Freedom Web Sites.
 


Signatures of people most affected
Who are against the Cascade Siskiyou National monument.

 

   Also view links at left to see how corrupt practices by BLM have distortedthe perception of the monument which needs no protection. See how environmentalsocialism throws out public opinion of those most affected to create falseneed for their groups, so to collect money from government and tax payersalike.





John Locke: 220: "

...........To tell people they may provide for themselves by erecting a new legislative, when,

by oppression,

artifice,

or being "delivered over" to a "foreign power",

their old one "is" "gone", is only to tell them they may expect relief when it is too late, and the evil is past cure.

Thisis, in effect, no more than to bid them first be slaves, and then to takecare of their liberty, and, when their chains are "on", tell them they may "act" like free men.

This, if barely so, is rather mockery than relief,

and men can never be secure from tyranny
>>>if there be no means to escape   it till they are perfectly under it;

and,
therefore, it is that they have "not only" a "right" to get "out of it", >>>but to prevent it   .



Here it is clear that freedom is no act.

Freedom is an actual condition and possession of powers, of defined rights granted of the Law of Nature and the Law of God.

Freedomis of natural law - God's Laws and the law of nature,  and adherenceof those laws by the legislative that was created in the original compact to
protect those rights and laws.

When the legislative abandons the "delegated" powers it was "originally" created for, so to protect the natural rights of those who created it to that end, and changes or sets designs against that end, it looses all authority, that government and all legislatures derived from it that continue with that abandonment cease; as do the authority and powers they once possessed.

Should they, any one, any number or all, attempt to become a measure of force to retain such powers, they place themselves at war with the people and are they themselves rebels, not the people who act to remove them.


John Locke establishes that when the legislative is either changed from the original purpose it was created, its powers cease; or when it transfers itself and its citizens into to hands of a foreign legislature it's power ceases.

When the Federal Government places the states under United Nations control, or under International Environmental mandates, it has relinquished its powers, first by acting without authority as it is a power not delegated to it and secondly by transferring the legislative powers of the states into the jurisdiction of a foreign power;

This also occurs when the States themselves transfer its legislative powers that are not delegated to them nor the federal government, into the hands of the federal government or into the hands of any other power. 




John Locke 232. Whosoever uses force without right -- as every one does in society who does it without law -- puts himself into a state of war with those against whom he so uses it, and in that state all former ties are canceled, all other rights cease, and every one has a right to defend himself, and to resist the aggressor.


John Locke  222. The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their "property"; and the end while they choose and authorize a legislative is that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the society, to limit the "power" and moderate the "dominion" of every part and member of the society.

For since it can
>>>"never" be supposed to be the "will" of the "society"   that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs "to secure" by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making:  "whenever" the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the "property" of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a "state of war with the people",


who are thereupon absolved from
"any farther obedience", and are left to the common refuge which "God hath provided" for "all men against force and violence".

 Whensoever, therefore,
the legislative shall "transgress" this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear, folly, or corruption, endeavor to grasp themselves, or "put into the hands" of "any other", an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this "breach of trust" they >>>"forfeit"   the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to "the people", who have a "right" to resume their "original liberty", and by the establishment of a new legislative (such as they shall think fit), provide for their own safety and security, which is the "end" for which they are "in" "society."  (i.e. protection of their property)


John Locke 227. In both the forementioned cases, when either the legislative is changed, or the legislators "act" "contrary to the end" for "which they were constituted", "those who are" guilty "are guilty" of rebellion.

For if any one by force takes away the established legislative of any society, and the laws by them made, pursuant to their trust, he thereby
takes away "the umpirage" which every one had consented to for a peaceable decision of all their controversies, and a bar to the state of war amongst them.

They "who remove" "or change" the legislative take away this decisive power, which nobody can have but by the appointment and consent of the people, and so destroying the authority which the people did, and nobody else can, set up, and introducing a power which the people hath not authorized, "actually introduce a state of war", which is that of "force without authority"; and thus by removing the legislative established by the society, in whose decisions the people acquiesced and united as to that of their own will, they untie the knot, and expose the people anew to the state of war. And if those, who by force take away the legislative, are rebels, the legislators themselves, as has been shown, can be "no less esteemed so", when they who were set up for the protection and preservation of the people, their "liberties" and "properties" shall by "force invade and endeavor" to "take them away";

and so they putting themselves into a state of war with those who made them the protectors and guardians of their peace, are properly, and with the greatest aggravation, rebellantes, rebels.




John Locke  228. But if they who say it lays a foundation for rebellion mean that it may occasion civil wars or intestine broils to tell the people they are absolved from obedience when "illegal" "attempts" are made upon their liberties "or" properties, and may oppose the unlawful violence of those who were their magistrates when they invade their properties, contrary to the trust put in them, and that, therefore, "this doctrine" is "not to be allowed", being 'so destructive to the "peace" of the world';

>>>they may as well say, upon the same ground, that honest men may not oppose robbers or pirates   , because this may occasion disorder or bloodshed. If any mischief come in such cases,

>>> it is
"not" to be charged upon "him who defends his own right", but "on him" that "invades his neighbour's"."


If
the innocent honest man must quietly quit all he has for "peace sake" to him who will lay violent hands upon it, I desire it may be considered what kind of a peace there will be in the world which consists only in violence and rapine, and which is to be maintained only for the benefit of robbers and oppressors.

Who would not think it an admirable "peace" betwixt the
mighty and the mean, when the lamb, without resistance, yielded his throat to be torn by the imperious wolf?  ....

(For more on John Locke and the Founders intent, See The American Patriot Party Web Site Index).
--------


Click Here for UPDATE! or go directly to BLM EXPANDS MONUMENT!

Local BLM Manager takes more private land along Jenny Creek with a stroke of his own pen! 

CascadeSiskiyou National Monument wording condemns private property, owners mayonly sell to Federal Government at their price!
Actualletters shown!  Presidential Proclamation condemnation by Clinton simplyallowing BLM local employees to write their own laws; Bush does nothing whilesmoking Clinton's cigar; appearing to enjoy it.


News Updateson BLM, Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior,  FederalGovernment and the Cascade Siskiyou National Monument.




 

News Update: Klamath Water Rights Adjudication Oregon State  Klamath Falls Update:Ranches robbed of water and land value by attorneys and procedures, crookedcorporations and blind or bought Hearing Panel Judges...  Corporationsattempt takeovers with old water claims... Federal Government attacks vestedwater rights in the adjudication process; State of Oregon Water Resourcesincorrectly "interprets" the laws that were made to protect vested waterrights by attempting to incorrectly present fees as a stumbling block forvalid vested rights and ignore weather related issues.

News Update: FederalGovernment Department of the Interior pulls National Archive web site tokeep ranchers from easily accessing homestead records during the KlamathFalls, Oregon, Klamath Water Adjudication. Their excuses are unfounded andthere is no other reason but willful manipulation.

The web site wasworking without flaw. Then taken off line for well over 9 months during crucialperiod during adjudication process.

 

Subjects Covered:Federal Government, US,  BLM,  Cascade Siskiyou National Monument,Presidential Proclamation, environmental special interest groups, environmentalstudies BLM Range Management, Bureau of Land Management Department of theInterior, streams, pastures, grazing permits, Federal regulations, Stateregulations, private land, irrigation, water right law, legal defense, Oregonlaw, federal law, FederalBureaucracy, Federal Law, grazing lease land buy out, Government cattle leaseland buy outs, water right issues, ODFW Oregon Fish and Game, Klamath FallsAdjudication, Federal Energy Commission FERC Re licensing news, Klamath Project.




Cascade Siskiyou National Monument:

The Jenny Creek Private Land Coalition News and the Cascade Siskiyou National Monument Update.

 Click here for frames if the header or controls at left are not visible.



The Jenny Creek Private Land Coalition
is devoted to protecting private property in the Cascade Siskiyou Monumentand educating citizen's to the importance of private property ownership ina free country; and to the dangers of a socialist bureaucracy which we nowpossess.





Get Educated! We advise allAmericans to become educated in the Declaration of Independence and understandwhat the 40 Grievances mean that are written there.

Review the
American Patriot Party for links to the Constitutional Debates that define the intents of Founding Fathers of this country. 

TheseGrievances describe tyranny in government (and what freedom is not). Thisis what we fight against. The opposite of these grievances is what freedomis.

These issues important then,  are as valid and pertainingand relevant to the issues of today. The lesson bears a warning that nothingever changes,  and that socialism, of which there are many kinds, isprogressive.

Such socialisms are that which always needs to be kept in check, resisted and removed.




News Update: Environmental tactics attempt to push reasoning that BLM Management willcost less without cattle on ranges and within the cascade Siskiyou Monument,then proposes expensive annual "Management"; 

Attempts to sell the idea of cutting water to "marginal" ranches in Klamath Falls.

Such good little socialists these are.... as if the government had been delegated any power take private property which it's legislative existence is solely meant to protect.

However both ideas are incorrect, as bureaucracy creates more bureaucracy which promises greater expense and more avenues for dependence upon government and financial burdens on the backs of private industry to support..

The only way to reduce federal costs is to removethe federal government hold on land  from the states and remove thefederal government from  managing state land.

Along with this, remove all federal regulations from these lands to allow free industry to grow.

By giving the lands to the states and their respective counties for  local control, as was first intended, the management will be up to local communities as they see fit, and employees paid reasonable salaries by vote.

Thiswill stop the Federal Government and Environmental Special Interests fromusing the IRS as a path to pay their salaries. 

The federal waste will stop,
because the federal government simply will not be there.

Learn More! 

Cascade Siskiyou Monument News Directory Report on the:US United States Government, BLM, US Bureau of Land Management, Departmentof the Interior,  US Federal Government and the Cascade Siskiyou NationalMonument. National Environmental News and Events. Klamath Falls Adjudication,Klamath Project and FERC Federal Energy Commission on the California Oregonboarder.  Water, power, fish passage, Indian, ranchers, farmers andirrigation district disputes news and information. USA boarder water lawand policies. Laws on water rights and grazing rights. Lease land grazingleases, Federal Oregon and California environmental law disputes on monument'spolicy in the west. Politics of Private Land Rights, Federal Land Rights,Federal Water Rights and Private Water Rights.

 


Jenny Creek Private Lands Coalition

   Jenny Creek Private Land Coalition represents 99% of all those people living on and around Jenny Creek.

(if controls above and at left are not visible, Click Here to get control frame)
 

   This is no small matter. This is our community, we live here every day. I myself have lived on Jenny Creek for over 33 years.

   We believe we have the right to do what we feel is best for our communityand defend against outside interest and people who have no other interestbut to use or utilize our surrounding land for their job security or as apolitical and special interest pawn.

   We are now forced to protect our community again from encroaching bureaucratswho are using undelegated power of the Constitution in the form of an executiveorder to create a "land reserve" that can only be viewed as being implementedfor political gain, bureaucratic job increase and position advancement.

   The land that the Department of the Interior is pushing for control is thearea known as the Soda Mountain area and also known and described as theCascade Siskiyou National Monument, or Cascade Siskiyou Ecological EmphasisArea ( CSEEA ) - Draft Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement.

The area is located in Southern Oregon on the Cascade mountain range. This area in fact having noneed for such special protection. So little such need and so invisible, asit takes environmental scientists microscopic tests to attempt to rationalizeit. The idea stemming from combined efforts from local environmentalist groups and the local Bureau of Land Management.

    We have said NO. But the federal government will not listen;

They are therefor in direct violationof their duties to the community to defend the rights and properties of thepeople and are not serving the people, but controlling the people. They invoketheir will, not ours. They intend to remove grazing; and intheir plan "D", "acquire" (take) rights to land that people do not wish tosell or move from. They thus plan to disrupt the lives of many families;or Harass them until they quit can find a way to discontinue the leases.

   It is these aggressions upon a local community who have made public the BLM'scontinued aggressive self edifying goals upon them. Fully all our pleas havebeen ignored by our representatives in the past. It is BLM's continued pressurethat reveals those ever so steady attempts to surround and take value fromthe ranch land and eventually land from private ownership of the people.


Land or Rights taken
in this way can never be lost, whether compensated or not.

John Locke: 186. "The conqueror, it is true, usually by the force he has over them, compels them, with a sword at their breasts, to stoop to his conditions, and submit to such a government as he pleases to afford them; but the inquiry is, what right he has to do so? If it be said they submit by their own consent, then this allows their own consent to be necessary to give the conqueror a title to rule over them. It remains only to be considered whether promises, extorted by force, >>>"without right"   , can be "thought consent", and how far they "bind".

Towhich I shall say, >>>"they bind not at all"   ; because>>>"whatsoever"    >>>"another"   >>>>>>>>gets from me "by force"       ,

 I still "retain the right of", and he is obliged presently to restore. He that forces my horse from me ought presently to restore him, and I have still a "right to retake him".

By the same reason, he that forced a promise from me ought presently to restore it
-- i.e., quit me of the obligation of it; or I may resume it myself -- i.e., choose whether I will perform it.

For the law of Nature laying an obligation on me, only by the rules she prescribes, "cannot oblige me" by the violation of her rules; such is the
"extorting" >>>"anything" from me "by force"   .

Nor does it "at all" alter the case, to say I gave my promise
, no more than it excuses the force,and passes the right, when I put my hand in my pocket and deliver my pursemyself to a thief who demands it with a pistol at my breast."






Rights of the Colonists:

"Thirdly, The supreme power cannot Justly take from any man, any
part of his property without his consent, in person >>>"or by his Representative.--"   "

"These are some of the first principles of natural law & Justice, and the great Barriers of all >>>free    states,"





 cascade Siskiyou National Monument.


Cascade Siskiyou National Monument

 

The Environmentalist movement is socialism.

Those who promote it, are socialists.

Freedom, being an American, and being a true patriot of freedom is more than living in a geological location.

Ask the British, they thought so, and were thrown out.

Don't preach freedom, then practice socialism.



Samuel Adams
American Patriot & Politician,

Who wrote 
The Rights of the Colonists
1722 - 1803

(A document which summarizes John Locke's Civil Government)

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty,

the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom,

 go home from us in peace.

We seek not your counsel, nor your arms.

Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;

May your chains set lightly upon you,

and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

                                           —Samuel Adams



What have you done to learn what it is to truly be free.



See the American Patriot Party and 

American Patriot Party of Oregon





 

    JCPLCintends to press the State officials to take back all ranch land the federalgovernment acquired and prevent the federal government from acquiring otherprivate lands.

Further to remove all lands from federal ownership and place the land under ownership and control of the Each Local Respective County were the lands are encompassed so to remove all meddling with local communities from distant state and federal legislatures and remove the tax burden that federal management places on American Citizens. See Bill being drafted.



Forit is clearly the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM)  only purpose, toexpand the federal bureaucracy through acquisitions and "make work" projects that have no end goals but endless annual "Maintenance" and "Studies".

   We will to do this by educating people and our representatives to the facts;revealing the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for who they are, what theydo (and don't do) and how they operate.

Please forward this link this site to everyone you know and all your representatives. Please place our Jenny Creek Private Lands Coalition web site link:
http://www.pacificwestcom.com/jennycreek and also The Oregon Patriot Party web site link: http://www.oregonpatriotparty.com

   We believe that all federal lands within all  states should be turnedover to those respective individual states, counties and at the same timeremoving all federal control, influence and tax burden on these lands completely.  See Bill being drafted.

    Please review our site, we feel you will find eye opening. Please revisit to find updated material.

    For the latest news CLICK HERE.     For Monument area map CLICK HERE see also CSEEA Draft Map that shows private property within the boundaries which BLM purposely omitted in the monument map.


 





TheFederal Government uses the same tactics we removed in the Revolutionarywar and have returned this type of control in greater force - Think not?

Lets read the Declaration of Independence.

3rd Grievance of the Declaration of Independence (defining Tyranny in government) : "He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature; a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only."


(Zoning and "Conditional use" permits which people must sign before building, and administrative laws, judges and courts the uphold such relinquishments where they should not - for inalienable rights are not relinquishable)


4th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence (defining Tyranny in government) : "He has called together legislative bodies, at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the repository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures";


(TheBLM has courts in the state of "Virginia" that decide on administrative lawsand to rule, they all but ignore pleas from individuals and if their strictlegal "procedure' is not adhered to, your pleas are worthless - absolutelyworthless. If the world wildlife and other international organizations suchas UN sanctions send in more letters than your little community, the BLMsteps on the will of your community, saying that it is in the greater publicinterest of others who live nowhere near your area)


5th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence (defining Tyranny in government) : "He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people."


(BLM has their own administrative judges laws and rules for their "Departments";

TheFederal government nor "These Departments" however cannot exceed or arrogateany new power but are explicitly limited to the delegated powers ".

This is clearly defined in the Constitutional debates:

 


Constitutional Debate:

MONDAY, June 16, 1788.[1] [Elliot misprinted this as Monday, June 14, 1788.]


Mr. (George) MASON:
then observed that he would willingly give them exclusive power, as far asrespected the "police" and good government of "the place"; but he would givethem "no more", because he thought it unnecessary. He was very willing togive them, in this as well as in all other cases, those powers which he thoughtindispensably necessary.

Mr. (James) MADISON: Mr. Chairman:"I did conceive, sir, that the clause under consideration was one of thoseparts which would speak its own praise. It is hardly necessary to say anything concerning it. Strike it out of the system, and let me ask whetherthere would not be much larger scope for those dangers. I cannot comprehendthat the power of legislating over a "small district", which "cannot exceed""ten miles square",

and may "not be more than one mile", will involvethe dangers which he apprehends. If there be any knowledge in my mind ofthe nature of man,

I should think it would be the
last thing that would enter into the mind of any man to grant "exclusive advantages", in a very >>>"circumscribed district"   , to the prejudice of the community at large." ....

"Ibelieve the States General have no jurisdiction over the Hague; but I haveheard that mentioned as a circumstance which gave undue influence to Hollandover the rest. We must limit our apprehensions to certain degrees of probability.The evils which they urge must result from this clause are extremely improbable;nay,
"almost" impossible."

Mr. GRAYSON: Mr. Chairman, one answer which has been given is, the improbability of the evil that it will never be attempted, and that it is almost impossible. This will not satisfy us, when we consider the great attachments men have to a great and "magnificent capital" (APP: Speaking of Washington DC and a national government). It would be the interest of the citizens of that district to aggrandize themselves by every possible means in their power, to the great injury of the other states. (APP: Quite a revelation)If we travel all over the world, we shall find that people have aggrandizedtheir own capitals. Look at Russia and Prussia. Every step has been takento aggrandize their capitals.

In what light are we to consider the
ten miles square?..."

".....It was often in contemplation of Congress to have power of regulating the police of the seat of government;"

 "but they "never" had an idea of exclusive legislation in all cases. The power of regulating the policeand good government of it will secure Congress against insults. What originatedthe idea of the exclusive legislation was, some insurrection in Pennsylvania,whereby Congress was insulted, on account of which, it is supposed, theyleft the state." (APP Note: This describes where the purpose of police powers was derived, a very limited purpose)

".....It is answered that the consent of the state "must" be required, or else they cannot have such a district, or places for the erecting of forts,

But how much is already
>>> "given" "them"!   (APP Note: The States gave "them") Look at the great country to the north-west of the Ohio, extending to and commanding the lakes."

Lookat the other end of the Ohio, towards South Carolina, extending to the Mississippi.See what these, in process of time, may amount to. They may grant "exclusive privileges" to any particular part of which they have the "possession".
(APP Note: Non delegatedfederal laws, enforcement and powers within the boarders of independent states,federal pay, federal union jobs, federal monuments, non profits, prevailingwages and benefits)

But it may be observed that those extensive countries will be formed into independent states, and that their consent will be "necessary".

Tothis I answer, that they may still grant such privileges as, in that country,are already granted to Congress by the states. The grants of Virginia, SouthCarolina, and other states, will be subservient to Congress in this respect.Of course, it results from the whole, that requiring the consent of the states will be no guard against this abuse of power."


Mr. HENRY
entertained strong suspicions that great dangers must result from the clause under consideration. They were not removed,
but rather confirmed,by the remarks of the honorable gentleman, in saying that it was extremelyimprobable that the members from New Hampshire and Georgia would go and legislateexclusively for the ten miles square.

 
If it was so improbable, why ask the power? Why demand a power which was "not to be exercised"?Compare this power, says he, with the next clause, which gives them powerto make all laws which shall be necessary to carry their laws into execution.By this they have a right to pass any law that may facilitate the executionof their acts. They have a right, by this clause, to make a law that sucha district shall be set apart for any purpose they please, and that any manwho shall act contrary to their commands, within certain ten miles square,or any place they may select, and strongholds, shall be hanged without benefitof clergy. If they think any law necessary for their personal safety,after perpetrating the most tyrannical and oppressive deeds, cannot theymake it by this sweeping clause? If it be necessary to provide, not only for this, but for any department or officer of Congress, does not this clause enable them to make a law for the purpose? And will not these laws, made for those purposes, be paramount to the laws of the states? Will not this clause give them a right to keep a powerful army continually on foot, if they think it necessary to aid the execution of their laws?

Is there any act, however atrocious, which they cannot do by virtue of this clause?Look at the use which has been made, in all parts of the world, of that humanthing called power. Look at the predominant thirst of dominion which has invariably and uniformly prompted rulers to abuse their powers.

Can you say that you will be safe when you give such unlimited powers, {437} without any real responsibility?Will you be safe when you trust men at Philadelphia with power to make anylaw that will enable them to carry their acts into execution? Will not the members of Congress have the same passions which other rulers have had?

They will not be superior to the frailties of human nature. However cautious you may be in the selection of your representatives, it will be dangerous to trust them with such unbounded powers. Shall we be told, when about to grant such illimitable authority, that it will never be exercised!

I conjure you once more to remember the admonition of that sage man who told you that, when you give power, you know not what you give. I know the absolute necessity of an energetic government.

But is it consistent with any principle of prudence or good policy to grant unlimited, unbounded authority, which is so totally unnecessary that gentlemen say it will never be exercised? But gentlemen say that we must make experiments.

A wonderful and unheard-of experiment it will be, to give "unlimited power unnecessarily!"I admit my inferiority in point of historical knowledge; but I believe noman can produce an instance of an unnecessary and unlimited power, givento a body independent of the legislature, within a particular district. Letany man in this Convention show me an instance of such separate and differentpowers of legislation in the same country show me an instance where a partof the community was independent of the whole.

The people within thatplace, and the strongholds, may be excused from all the burdens imposed onthe rest of the society, and may enjoy exclusive emoluments, to the greatinjury of the rest of the people.

But gentlemen say that the power will not he abused. They ought to show that it is necessary. All their powers may be fully carried into execution, without this exclusive authority in the ten miles square.

The sweeping clause will fully enable them to do what they please. What could the most extravagant and boundless imagination ask, but power
to do every thing?

I have reason to suspect ambitious grasps at power. Theexperience of the world teaches me the jeopardy of giving enormous power.Strike this clause out of the form of the government, and how will it stand?Congress will still have power, by the sweeping clause, to make laws withinthat {438} place and the strongholds, independently of the local authority of the state. I ask you, if this clause be struck out, whether the sweeping clause will not enable them to protect themselves from insult. If you grant them these powers, you destroy every degree of responsibility. They will fully screen them from justice,and preclude the possibility of punishing them. No instance can be givenof such a wanton grasp of power as an exclusive legislation in all caseswhatever.


MR. JAMES MADISON: "....The honorablemember asks, Why ask for this power, and if the subsequent clause be notfully competent for the same purpose. If so,
what new terrors can arise from this particular clause? It is only a superfluity. >>> "If that latitude of construction"   which he contends for were to take place with respect to the sweeping clause, there would be room for those horrors.

But it gives "no" supplementary power.

It
only enables them to execute the "delegated" powers.

If the "delegation" of their powers be "safe", no possible inconvenience can arise from this clause.

It is at most "but" explanatory.

For when any power is given, its
delegation necessarily involves "authority" to make laws to execute it.Were it possible to delineate on paper all those particular cases and circumstancesin which legislation by the general legislature would be necessary, and leaveto the states all the other powers, I imagine no gentleman would object toit. But this is not within the limits of human capacity.

The particular powers which are found necessary to be given {439} are therefore delegated "generally", and particular and
minute specification is left to the legislature...

.."When the honorable member objects to giving the general government jurisdiction over the
"place"of their session, does he mean that it should be under the control of anyparticular state, that might, at a critical moment, seize it? I should havethought that this clause would have met with the most cordial approbation.

As the
"consent" of the state in which it may be must be obtained, and as it may stipulate the terms of the grant, should they violate the particular stipulations it would be an usurpation; so that, >>>"if"   the members of Congress were to be guided by the "laws" of their country, none of those dangers could arise.


Mr. HENRY replied that, if Congress were vested with supreme power of legislation, paramount to the constitution and laws of the states, the dangers he had described might happen; for that Congress would not be confined to the
"enumerated" powers.

This construction was warranted, in his opinion,
>>>>by the addition of the word     

>>>> "department"   
,

at the end of the clause, and that they could make any laws which they might think necessary to execute the powers of any department or officer of the government.
(APP Note: A very Important Warning)


Mr. PENDLETON: Mr. Chairman, this clause does >>>"not"   give Congress power to impede the operation of >>>any part   of the Constitution, or to make >>>any regulation   that may

>>> affect the interests of the citizens   of the >>>Union at large.  

But it gives them power over the "local" "police" of the "place", so as to be secured from any interruption in their proceedings. Notwithstanding the violent attack upon it, I believe, sir, this is the fair construction of the clause.

It gives them power of exclusive legislation in any case within that district. What is the meaning of this? What is it opposed to? Is it opposed to the >>> general powers of the federal legislature,   or to those of the state legislatures? I understand it as opposed to the legislative power of that state "where it shall be". What, then, is the power? It is, that Congress shall exclusively legislate there,

in order to preserve {440} serve the police of the placeand their own personal independence, that they may not be overawed or insulted,and of course to preserve them in opposition to any attempt by the statewhere it shall be this is the fair construction. Can we suppose that, inorder to effect these salutary ends, Congress will make it an asylum forvillains and the vilest characters from all parts of the world? Will it notdegrade their own dignity to make it a sanctuary for villains? I hope thatno man that will ever "compose" that Congress will associate with the mostprofligate characters. (APP: If this was not such a sad statement, it would be funny)

...With respect to the necessity of the ten miles squarebeing superseded by the subsequent clause, which gives them power to makeall laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into executionthe foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution inthe government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof, >>>I understand that clause as not going a single step beyond the delegated powers.  

Whatcan it act upon? Some power given by this Constitution. If they should beabout to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue someof the "delegated" powers,

but can
>>> by "no means" depart from them,   

>>>>or arrogate "any new" powers;  
for the plain language of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give "effect" to the

">>>"delegated"    powers"."



 


Counter by Rapid Axcess
Counter by Rapid Axcess
 


Cascade Siskiyou National Monument




Constitutional Debates,

MONDAY, June 16, 1788.[1] [Elliot misprinted this as Monday, June 14, 1788.]

Continued.

As clearly presented by Mr. Pendleton within the Constitutional Debates, there is NOTHING in the Constitution that grants "Presidential Proclamations" nor anything that would effect the "citizens of the Union at large".


This is because providing for the "General Welfare" has to do with "military defense" against foreign agression of the nation and not to be used for meddling in state business or creating unto itself new powers.

This was clearly defined by the Founders.

George Mason in the same debate summarizes these dangers of the federal government perverting "general phrases" as the
"General Welfare":


Mr. GEORGE MASON.Mr. Chairman, gentlemen say there is no new power given by this clause. Isthere any thing in this Constitution which secures to the states the powerswhich are said to be retained? Will powers remain to the states whichare not expressly guarded and reserved? I will suppose a case. Gentlemenmay call it an impossible case, and "suppose" that Congress will act with wisdom and integrity. Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common "defence"; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions {442} should arise under "this" government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of "those" powers; could not Congress, under the "idea" of providing for the "general welfare", and under their "own" "construction", say that this was destroying the "general peace", encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people?And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restrictionOn the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction withinthe ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury? Would they not extend their implication? It appears to me that they may and "will". And shall the support of our rights depend on the bounty of men "whose interest it may be to oppress us"? That Congress should have power to provide for the general welfare of the Union, I grant. But I wish a clause in the Constitution, with respect to all powers which are not granted, that they are retained by the states. Otherwise, the power of providing for the general welfare may be "perverted to its destruction".


As presented by the founders, the federal congress or President cannot act outside its delegated powers.

A Presidential Proclamation is an undeligated power of the Original Compact

Being an undelegated power is therefor VOID and of NO POWER.



The EXACT DANGER that George Mason warned of occurred only years after the Constitution was ratified when the Alien and Sedition Acts in John Adams administration threatened the country sending the two prominent Authors of both the Declaration of Independence and Constitution to correct the federal government who attempted to corrupt the plain sense meaning and very Limited delegated powers of the Constitution. 



This is clearly defined by
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions



Virginia Resolution of 1798

Authors: Thomas Jefferson and James Madison:


RESOLVED,
That the General Assembly of Virginia, doth unequivocably express a firm resolution to maintain and defend the
Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of this State, against every aggression either foreign or domestic, and that they will support "the government" of the United States in all measures "warranted" by "the former".

That this assembly most solemnly declares a warm attachment to the Union of the "States", to maintain which it pledges all its powers; and that for this end, it is their duty to watch over and oppose every infraction of those principles which constitute the "only basis" of that Union, because a faithful observance of them, can alone secure it's existence and the public happiness.

That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the
"plain sense and intention" of the instrument constituting the "compact"; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants "enumerated" in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.

That the General Assembly doth also express its deep regret, that a spirit has in sundry instances, been manifested by the
federal government, to enlarge its powers by forced constructions of the constitutional charter which defines them; and that implications have appeared of a "design"


to expound certain
general "phrases"


(which having been copied from the very limited grant of power, in the former articles of confederation were the less liable to be
misconstrued) so as to destroy the meaning and effect, of the particular "enumeration" which necessarily explains and limits the general phrases; and so as to consolidate the states by degrees, into one sovereignty, the obvious tendency and inevitable consequence of which would be, to transform the present republican system of the United States, into an absolute, or at best a mixed monarchy.

Thatthe General Assembly doth particularly protest against the palpable and alarminginfractions of the Constitution, in the two late cases of the "Alien andSedition Acts" passed at the last session of Congress; the first of whichexercises a power
no where delegated to the federal government, and which by >>> "uniting legislative and judicial powers" to "those of" "executive", "subverts the general principles of free government"    ;


(APPNote: Presidential Proclamations -  "go beyond this" by placing theexecutive above all legislative and judicial, and subverts the general principlesof free government)



The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798

Authors: Thomas Jefferson and James Madison:

1. "Resolved, That the several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a
compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes — delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and

that whensoever the
general government assumes "undelegated powers",

its acts are >>>> unauthoritative, void, and of no force    :

that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact

was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself;

since that would have made its discretion, and
not the Constitution,

the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an
equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress."



The reasonings are clearly expounded in the Declaration of Independence years before in defining Tyranny in government.


7th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence, (defining Tyranny in government) : "He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and >>> raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands."    


(Monuments,land condemnation, regulations that surround, control and remove privateproperty and rights all are undelegated and not the intended purpose of government)


13th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence (defining Tyranny in government) :  "He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitutions and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation"


(UN and wildlife Organizations and administrative laws, procedures, judges and courts)


17th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence (defining Tyranny in government) : "For imposing taxes on us without our consent";


(self explanatory - the 16th amendment found unconstitutional by the supreme court was manipulated by making it a part of the constitution through an amendment - thereby corrupting the constitution itself.)


20th  Grievance of the Declaration of Independence (defining Tyranny in government) : For  abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these colonies;


 (Presidentialpowers which where only created for, and as, a war powers act to protectus from enemies, have now begun to be used to attack the citizens of theUnited States, as presented in the debates that providing for the generalwelfare was "not to be used to enact laws over the Union at Large")


22nd Grievance of the Declaration of Independence (defining Tyranny in government) : For suspending our own legislatures and declaring themselves invested with power to "legislate for us in all cases whatsoever".


 (Presidentialpowers which where only created for, and as, a war powers act to protectus from enemies, have now begun to be used to attack the citizens of theUnited States, as presented in the debates that providing for the generalwelfare was "not to be used to enact laws over the Union at Large")




The 10th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence (defining Tyranny in government) :

"He has erected a multitude of new offices and

sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance".






The Federal government is guilty of all these.



The only answer:

Complete Removal of federal ownership and control of lands within the states.



Only this will remove the endless taxation and regulations - 
See Bill being Drafted.



 

Here are some of our local members and supporters: (see list being compiled and updated)

For the fight against Federal Socialism, join the
American Patriot Party

Local.

Richard Taylor
Robert Taylor
Jerry Barry
Tracie Gibson
Tom Gibson
Vernon Hopkins
Patrice Ward
Joe Laubacher
Phill Laubacher
Mark Randall
Danil Thomas
Julie Thomas
H.J. Burrow
Edith Burrow
Donald Rowlett
Alan Troutman
Judith Troutman
Dale Odom
Stephani Odom
Bud Odom
Charles Witter
Jamie Peters
Bonnie Minntoli
Rebel Minntoli
William Miller
Christine Miller
Mike Cox
Anita Riordan
Nancy Gallagher
Kathleen Watt
Harold Watt
Carrol Watt
Bobby Miller
 

    E-mail us

Representative e-mails, faxes  and contacts


BLM,Bureau of Land Management Department of the Interior,  Federal Governmentand the Cascade Siskiyou National Monument News:

Click Here for UPDATE! or go directly to BLM EXPANDS MONUMENT!

Local BLM Manager takes more private land along Jenny Creek with a stroke of his own pen! 

CascadeSiskiyou National Monument wording condemns private property...owners mayonly sell to Federal Government at their price!
Actualletters shown!  Presidential Proclamation condemnation by Clinton simplyallowing BLM local employees to write their own laws; Bush does nothing whilesmoking Clinton's cigar; appearing to enjoy it.


News Updateson BLM, Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior,  FederalGovernment and the Cascade Siskiyou National Monument.

News Update: Klamath Water Rights Adjudication Oregon State  Klamath Falls Update:Ranches robbed of water and land value by attorneys and procedures, crookedcorporations and blind or bought Hearing Panel Judges...  Corporationsattempt takeovers with old water claims... Federal Government attacks vestedwater rights in the adjudication process; State of Oregon Water Resourcesincorrectly "interprets" the laws that were made to protect vested waterrights by attempting to incorrectly present fees as a stumbling block forvalid vested rights and ignore weather related issues.

News Update: FederalGovernment Department of the Interior pulls National Archive web site tokeep ranchers from easily accessing homestead records during the KlamathFalls, Oregon, Klamath Water Adjudication. Their excuses are unfounded andthere is no other reason but willful manipulation. The web site was workingwithout flaw. Well over 9 months with no access; Finally available afterremoving itself during the Klamath Falls Adjudication process!
 

Cascade Siskiyou National Monument News,Official Jenny Creek Private Lands Coalition Web Site, Defending PrivateProperty, Private Property protection links and other Freedom Web Sites.Subjects: Federal Government, US,  BLM,  Cascade SiskiyouNational Monument. BLM Range Management, Bureau of Land Management Departmentof the Interior, streams, pastures, private land, irrigation, water rights,legal defense, Oregon law, USA federal law License.
                        




                         Bureau of Land Management, Siskiyou National Monument Cattle Grazing USA





Member American Patriot Party of Oregon an Independent State Party of the American Patriot Party PFUSA!Welcome Members of the People for the USA! Cascade Siskiyou National MonumentPrivate Property Rights -  Not Inholders, but Property Owners

 


Cascade Siskiyou National Monument Cascade Siskiyou National Monument

Cascade Siskiyou National Monument

 

John Locke - Civil Government
(continued)


John Locke 222:   The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their "property"; and the end while they choose and authorize a legislative is that there may be laws made, and rules set, as "guards" and "fences" to the properties of all the society, to limit the "power" and moderate the "dominion" of every part and member of the society.

For since it can
>>>"never" be supposed<<< to be the will of the society that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one >>>designs to secure<<< by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making:

"whenever" the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the "property" of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a "state of war with the people",

who are thereupon absolved from "any farther obedience", and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence. Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall "transgress" this fundamental rule of society,"


John Locke 149:  "....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving themselves from the "attempts" and "designs" of "anybody", even of their "legislators", whenever they shall be so "foolish" or so "wicked" as to lay and carry on "designs" against the liberties and "properties" of the subject.

For no man or society of men having a power to deliver up their preservation, or consequently the "means" of it, to the absolute will and arbitrary "dominion" of another, whenever any one shall go about to bring them into such a slavish condition, they will always have a right to preserve what they have not a power to part with, and to
"rid" themselves of "those" who invade this fundamental, sacred, and unalterable law of self-preservation "for which" they "entered" into "society". ..."


 


Foolish Environmental Proposals:


RE: Klamath Falls HearingStatement, Oregon Natural Resources Council (Environmental Group Now "OregonWild" .org) June 16th, 2001

See the Environmentalist Statement - (Andy Kerr)
http://www.andykerr.net/KlamathBasin/KFHearingStatement.html



 

In Rebuttal


In oppositionto such notions that environmentalists such as these have, it is historicallyestablished that such notions are founded in the advancement of socialism:




Our advice to Klamath Falls County Citizens and Klamath County Government is to:

 

1.) Establish County laws restricting federal intervention of local County laws and local County legislation.

The Federal government is not a "party" but a servant. It is limited to what delegated powers under which it was first established.Powers to debate local issues on water use, or land use is not a power thatwas delegated to it. When the state was created, the land fell to the stateand their respective counties.

The federal government therefore has no say, it is not only neutral, but a non entity . The only delegated power is for transferring its lands and powers in those lands, intothe hands of the people of each state and community the land resides fordistribution to the citizens who wish to reside there.

The only land the federal government may possess in limited portions that have been sanctified by each state, is for forts. That's it.

This is established in the
Constitutional Debates, the federal government has nopolicing powers of federal law outside the "10 mile square" of WashingtonDC, and cannot create such laws that effect the Union at Large;

Only after a declaration of war granted by states to be used in foreign wars;

State insurrections are state controlled operations that can request aid from the federal government - i.e. other state's militia; but the federal government
cannot dictate, the state having full powers of application over military and "state" organized militia while within the boarders of the state that requested assistance.

See Constitutional Debate.


2.) Establish Federal Bills that will Transfer all Federal Lands into the ownership and Control of the counties.

This is to provide local commonwealths most closely effected (1 - 5 miles maximum area) within the county exclusive powers of their area over outside manipulations or controls. Bringing control to citizens most affected within that County by and to any issue of their area.




3.) Ranchers need to work to increase values of land, and NOT fall prey to selling at a cut rate to the federal Government, but to remove the federal government from the county, and remove adverse zoning laws to allow smaller ranches, for homes and businesses of all types so that more people can benefit from the land;

This is far more practical than removing productive land from availability to private ownership by citizens.




4.)
Remove the Funnelcreated by the Federal governments involvement in the county which has allowed paths for  national and international environmental laws into your countyand state, and you will remove the chains of socialism from your wrists.

They will be removed because "the federal government will not be there" as a catalyst for the environmental movement to ride upon; or for the environmental movement to derive power from, to dictate what you do with your private land.

The power will be gone from them, and into your hands; as you, and your county and local communities will have "absolute control of the land for your personal and family's benefit".


You will have removed the powers of a distant and unconcerned legislator over your private property.




5.) Do you know why your land would be hard at this time to derive profit either in production or sale?

a.) Because you are "denied the right" to "use it" as "you see fit".

b.)
You are limited by mandated zoning laws passed from federal to state to county restricting the size you may sell at.

c.) You are restricted by what type of business you can have and where it can be located.




6.) Zoning exceeds simple practical building codes and practical pollution standards and arbitrarily decides what, where and how you live and do business.

Get rid of the federal government and zoning from your communities and you still can retain your building codes and pollution standards, but you will be able to do what you want with your property.




7.)
Environmentalists attempt to shroud their intent and goals to remove land and power from communities.

They use "catch phrases" after presenting what they determine a real value which is usually 1/20 or less the real value, then offer to double it for "Willing Sellers"  and say, it is  because it is "...just the right thing to do" (Andy Kerr Public Hearing Statement:  http://www.andykerr.net/KlamathBasin/KFHearingStatement.html )

Kerr and others like him use the same tactics in their bid to removing leasees from the Cascade Siskiyou Monument saying that the ranchers need to be "kept whole" offering them a choice to either willingly sell at "their stipulated price - value"or risk getting nothing for their lease land by simply pressuring the BLMthrough bogus and slanted studies by so called  "environmental Professionals"all trained by college professors with the same prejudice and endless studiesthat insure continuation of the professions they teach.

They will then will "of course" increase elk herds in place of cattle herds; Then establish more federally "mandated" studies; That forcibly paid by you through arbitrary forced and mandated, non enumerated unconstitutional taxation; So to benefit from the turmoil stirred up by these environmental groups and professional environmentalists for job security through donations sent in from environmental brain washing of others and government contracts... again forcibly paid by you through arbitrary forced and mandated, non enumerated unconstitutional taxation.

Kerr'sarticle attempts to rationalize his environmental impositions by indicatingthe federal government would be able to purchase what he terms "marginal farm land"after a lengthy speech in his article on how much subsidized farming thereis in Klamath Falls, and that at 4,000 feet elevation he presents that itis ...really not the ideal for farming;

This type of statement clearly attempting to disillusion both the land owners and the public into believing their highly valuable land that is ideal for Farming, simply because it is flat, farmable, rich soiled, easily accessible and above all, has extremely valuable water rights...

Waterrights which they the environmentalists, of course, are after to take awayfrom the land and really devalue it; so the land itself can be taken forminimal cost now or later.

Kerr concedes that $4000.oo an acre (twice of what he personally has deemed it is worth) is not enough however to compensate for the "loss of life style" ... but Kerr explains ....enough to "get clear of the bank" and have a "little something" left for retirement or the kid's "college fund"....


.....How thoughtful of him, and so not to be construed incorrectly, a statement I sarcastically have presented.




8.) It appears that there are always environmentalists there  to relieve you of the "burdensom" land you own from prices "held down from mandated zoning laws" and "controlled market prices".

By getting rid of zoning, the land value will increase because of the many other uses can be freely developed at each person's and property owner's will.




9.) We will show you how to make your farmland valuable.

Convince your county commissioners to refuse state and federal zoning mandates. Or Elect those who will.

Take away restrictions on property so ranchers will be able to break their land into "market determined" smaller parcels,  divide the land, build upon them and use them "as they see fit".

The  land would then command far higher "per acre" free market prices.

There will not only be money for the kids college fund and retirement, but for investment and farm and lifestyle improvement.

Not only that, but land will be more available for ownership by others and their posterity. 

Farmers outweigh environmentalists in the Klamath Falls area;

Votethe right farmers into county positions that will take command, establishlocal laws that defy state and federal undelegated impositions, empower locallaw enforcement of those laws and protect the rights and property of thepeople in the Klamath Basin.

Make your laws and Use the local laws and powers  to take control and protect property rights in land and water.



John Locke: 186. "The conqueror, it is true, usually by the force he has over them, compels them, with a sword at their breasts, to stoop to his conditions, and submit to such a government as he pleases to afford them;but the inquiry is, what right he has to do so? If it be said they submitby their own consent, then this allows their own consent to be necessaryto give the conqueror a title to rule over them. It remains only to be consideredwhether promises, extorted by force, >>>"without right"<<<, can be "thought consent", and how far they "bind".

To which I shall say,
>>>"they bind not at all"<<<; because >>>"whatsoever"<<<>>>"another"<<< >>>>>>>>gets fromme "by force"<<<<<<<<,  (APP Note: Without Consent)

 I still retain the right of, and he is obliged presently to restore. He that forces my horse from me ought presently to restore him, and I have still a right to retake him.

By the same reason,
hethat forced a promise from me ought presently to restore it -- i.e., quitme of the obligation of it; or I may resume it myself -- i.e., choose whetherI will perform it.

For the law of Nature laying an obligation on me, only by the rules she prescribes, "cannot oblige me" by the violation of her rules; such is the "extorting" >>>"anything" from me "by force"<<<.

Nor does it "at all" alter the case, to say I gave my promise, no more than it excuses the force,and passes the right, when I put my hand in my pocket and deliver my pursemyself to a thief who demands it with a pistol at my breast."

 

Combating Intimidation

Intimidation, whether immediate or eventual, is as much a method of force as is a pistol, or arbitrary law that engages the public powers that possess the means to wrest property or rights to use property from a rightful owners hands.




John Locke 193.But granting that the conqueror, in a just war, has a right to the estates,as well as power over the persons of the conquered, which, it is plain, hehath not, nothing of absolute power will follow from hence in the continuanceof the government. Because the descendants of these being all free men,if he grants them estates and possessions to inhabit his country, withoutwhich it would be worth nothing, whatsoever he grants them they have so faras it is granted property in; the nature whereof is, that, without a man's own consent, it cannot be taken from him.

John Locke 194. Their persons are free by a native right, and their properties, be they more or less, are their own, and at their own dispose, and not at his; or else it is no property.Supposing the conqueror gives to one man a thousand acres, to him and hisheirs for ever; to another he lets a thousand acres, for his life, underthe rent of L50 or L500 per annum. Has not the one of these a right to his thousand acres for ever,and the other during his life, paying the said rent? And hath not the tenantfor life a property in all that he gets over and above his rent, by his labourand industry, during the said term, supposing it be double the rent? Can any one say, the king, or conqueror, after his grant,may, by his power of conqueror, take away all, or part of the land, fromthe heirs of one, or from the other during his life, he paying the rent?Or, can he take away from either the goods or money they have got upon thesaid land at his pleasure? If he can, then all free and voluntary contracts cease, and are void in the world;there needs nothing but power enough to dissolve them at any time, and allthe grants and promises of men in power are but mockery and collusion. For can there be anything more ridiculous than to say, I give you and yours this for ever, and that in the surest and most solemn way of conveyance can be devised, and yet it is to be understood that I have right, if I please, to take it away from you again to-morrow?

APP Note: Relate this to US Land Patents 


absolute granting of properties and the Attempt of the Federal Governmentto condemn such land (or water by common law attached to the land) later,or the state to condemn such property after giving consent to adjudicatesuch transfer by authority of the United States by which it was a party,or to create new regulations upon it after granting it with none; To encirclethat land in national monument and control the inroads and water, or toregulate limits to anything with regard to it, or to arbitrarily tax it intodebt and thereby rendering the land not owned but rented, when no taxes werein established at the receiving of it, or to tax it without consent,or tax without consent for things built upon that property to improve itsvalue, or raised upon it to derive sustenance and earnings from his labors,or derive any such without consent from those he wills it to.

And you will find that neither the federal government, nor the state government has the power to do so, nor has any power of such been delegated to it by the original compacts they exist under.

For once property is possessed of a person, it is any governments duty to protect it, and not to devise a design to wrest it away after all rights had been released ; As this clearly established by Locke that the protection of property is the purpose of government and the reason that the person enters into society.

John Locke 202. Wherever law ends, tyranny begins, if the law be transgressed to another's harm; and whosoever in authority exceeds the power given him by the law, and makes use of the force he has under his command tocompass that upon the subject which the law allows not, ceases in that tobe a magistrate, and acting without authority may be opposed, as any otherman who by force invades the right of another.This is acknowledged in subordinate magistrates. He that hath authority toseize my person in the street may be opposed as a thief and a robber if heendeavours to break into my house to execute a writ, notwithstanding that I know he has such a warrant and such a legal authority as will empower him to arrest me abroad. And why this should not hold in the highest, as well as in the most inferior magistrate, I would gladly be informed.Is it reasonable that the eldest brother, because he has the greatest partof his father's estate, should thereby have a right to take away any of hisyounger brothers' portions? Or that a rich man, who possessed a wholecountry, should from thence have a right to seize, when he pleased, the cottageand garden of his poor neighbour? The being rightfully possessed of great power and riches, exceedingly beyond the greatest part of the sons of Adam, is so far from being an excuse, much less a reason for rapine and oppression, which the endamaging another without authority is, that it is a great aggravation of it. For exceeding the bounds of authority is no more a right in a great than a petty officer, no more justifiable in a king than a constable. But so much the worse in him as that he has more trust put in him, is supposed, from the advantage of education and counsellors, to have better knowledge and less reason to do it, having already a greater share than the rest of his brethren.


-----------
 

John Locke Chapter 11: Of the "Extent" of the Legislative Power


John Locke 134.
THE great end of men's entering into society
being the enjoyment of their propertiesin peace and safety, and the great instrument and means of that being thelaws established in that society, the first and fundamental positive lawof all commonwealths is the establishing of the legislative power, as thefirst and fundamental natural law which is to govern even the legislative.Itself is the preservation of the society and (as far as will consist withthe public good) of every person in it. This legislative is not only thesupreme power of the commonwealth, but sacred and unalterable in the handswhere the community have once placed it. Nor can any edict of anybody else,in what form soever conceived, or by what power soever backed, have the forceand obligation of a law which has not its sanction from that legislativewhich the public has chosen and appointed; for without this the law couldnot have that which is absolutely necessary to its being a law, the consentof the society, over whom nobody can have a power to make laws9 but by theirown consent and by authority received from them; and therefore all the obedience,which by the most solemn ties any one can be obliged to pay, ultimately terminatesin this supreme power, and is directed by those laws which it enacts. Norcan any oaths to any foreign power whatsoever, or any domestic subordinatepower, discharge any member of the society from his obedience to the legislative,acting pursuant to their trust, nor oblige him to any obedience contraryto the laws so enacted or farther than they do allow, it being ridiculousto imagine one can be tied ultimately to obey any power in the society whichis not the supreme.

John Locke 135. Though the legislative,whether placed in one or more, whether it be always in being or only by intervals,though it be the supreme power in every commonwealth, yet, first, it is not,nor can possibly be, absolutely arbitrary over the lives and fortunes ofthe people. For it being but the joint power of every member of the societygiven up to that person or assembly which is legislator, it can be no morethan those persons had in a state of Nature before they entered into society,and gave it up to the community. For nobody can transfer to another morepower than he has in himself, and nobody has an absolute arbitrary powerover himself, or over any other, to destroy his own life, or take away thelife or property of another. A man, as has been proved, cannot subject himselfto the arbitrary power of another; and having, in the state of Nature, noarbitrary power over the life, liberty, or possession of another, but onlyso much as the law of Nature gave him for the preservation of himself andthe rest of mankind, this is all he doth, or can give up to the commonwealth,and by it to the legislative power, so that the legislative can have no morethan this. Their power in the utmost bounds of it is limited to the publicgood of the society.10 It is a power that hath no other end but preservation,and therefore can never have a right to destroy, enslave, or designedly toimpoverish the subjects; the obligations of the law of Nature cease not insociety, but only in many cases are drawn closer, and have, by human laws,known penalties annexed to them to enforce their observation. Thus the lawof Nature stands as an eternal rule to all men, legislators as well as others.The rules that they make for, other men's actions must, as well as theirown and other men's actions, be conformable to the law of Nature -- i.e.,to the will of God, of which that is a declaration, and the fundamental lawof Nature being the preservation of mankind, no human sanction can be goodor valid against it.

John Locke 136. Secondly, the legislative or supreme authority cannot assume to itself a power to rule by extemporary arbitrary decrees, but is bound to dispense justice and decide the rights of the subject by promulgated standing laws, 11
(APP Note: See these exact words in the Rights of the Colonists) and known authorized judges. For the law of Nature being unwritten, and sonowhere to be found but in the minds of men, they who, through passion orinterest, shall miscite or misapply it, cannot so easily be convinced oftheir mistake where there is no established judge; and so it serves not asit aught, to determine the rights and fence the properties of those thatlive under it, especially where every one is judge, interpreter, and executionerof it too, and that in his own case; and he that has right on his side, havingordinarily but his own single strength, hath not force enough to defend himselffrom injuries or punish delinquents. To avoid these inconveniences whichdisorder men's properties in the state of Nature, men unite into societiesthat they may have the united strength of the whole society to secure anddefend their properties, and may have standing rules to bound it by whichevery one may know what is his. To this end it is that men give up all theirnatural power to the society they enter into, and the community put the legislativepower into such hands as they think fit, with this trust, that they shallbe governed by declared laws, or else their peace, quiet, and property willstill be at the same uncertainty as it was in the state of Nature.

John Locke 137.Absolute arbitrary power, or governing without settled standing laws, canneither of them consist with the ends of society and government, whichmen would not quit the freedom of the state of Nature for, and tie themselvesup under, were it not to preserve their lives, liberties, and fortunes, andby stated rules of right and property to secure their peace and quiet. Itcannot be supposed that they should intend, had they a power so to do, togive any one or more an absolute arbitrary power over their persons and estates,and put a force into the magistrate's hand to execute his unlimited willarbitrarily upon them; this were to put themselves into a worse conditionthan the state of Nature, wherein they had a liberty to defend their rightagainst the injuries of others, and were upon equal terms of force to maintainit, whether invaded by a single man or many in combination. Whereas by supposingthey have given up themselves to the absolute arbitrary power and will ofa legislator, they have disarmed themselves, and armed him to make a preyof them when he pleases; he being in a much worse condition that is exposedto the arbitrary power of one man who has the command of a hundred thousandthan he that is exposed to the arbitrary power of a hundred thousand singlemen, nobody being secure, that his will who has such a command is betterthan that of other men, though his force be a hundred thousand times stronger.And, therefore, whatever form the commonwealth is under, the ruling powerought to govern by declared and received laws, and not by extemporary dictatesand undetermined resolutions, for then mankind will be in a far worse conditionthan in the state of Nature if they shall have armed one or a few men withthe joint power of a multitude, to force them to obey at pleasure the exorbitantand unlimited decrees of their sudden thoughts, or unrestrained, and tillthat moment, unknown wills, without having any measures set down which mayguide and justify their actions. For all the power the government has, beingonly for the good of the society, as it ought not to be arbitrary and atpleasure, so it ought to be exercised by established and promulgated laws,that both the people may know their duty, and be safe and secure within thelimits of the law, and the rulers, too, kept within their due bounds, andnot be tempted by the power they have in their hands to employ it to purposes,and by such measures as they would not have known, and own not willingly.

John Locke 138.
Thirdly, the supreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent.  (APP Note: See these exact words in the Rights of the Colonists)For the preservation of property being the end of government, and that forwhich men enter into society, it necessarily supposes and requires that thepeople should have property, without which they must be supposed to losethat by entering into society which was the end for which they entered intoit; too gross an absurdity for any man to own. Men, therefore, in societyhaving property, they have such a right to the goods, which by the law ofthe community are theirs, that nobody hath a right to take them, or any partof them, from them without their own consent; without this they have no propertyat all. For I have truly no property in that which another can by right takefrom me when he pleases against my consent. Hence it is a mistake to thinkthat the supreme or legislative power of any commonwealth can do what itwill, and dispose of the estates of the subject arbitrarily, or take anypart of them at pleasure. This is not much to be feared in governments wherethe legislative consists wholly or in part in assemblies which are variable,whose members upon the dissolution of the assembly are subjects under thecommon laws of their country, equally with the rest. But in governments wherethe legislative is in one lasting assembly, always in being, or in one manas in absolute monarchies, there is danger still, that they will think themselvesto have a distinct interest from the rest of the community, and so will beapt to increase their own riches and power by taking what they think fitfrom the people. For a man's property is not at all secure, though therebe good and equitable laws to set the bounds of it between him and his fellow-subjects,if he who commands those subjects have power to take from any private manwhat part he pleases of his property, and use and dispose of it as he thinksgood.

John Locke 139. But government, into whosesoever hands it is put, being as I have before shown, entrusted with this condition, and for this end,
that men might have and secure their properties,the prince or senate, however it may have power to make laws for the regulatingof property between the subjects one amongst another, yetcan never have a power to take to themselves the whole, or any part of thesubjects' property, without their own consent; for this would be in effectto leave them no property at all.And to let us see that even absolute power, where it is necessary, is notarbitrary by being absolute, but is still limited by that reason and confinedto those ends which required it in some cases to be absolute, we need lookno farther than the common practice of martial discipline. For the preservationof the army, and in it of the whole commonwealth, requires an absolute obedienceto the command of every superior officer, and it is justly death to disobeyor dispute the most dangerous or unreasonable of them; but yet we see thatneither the sergeant that could command a soldier to march up to the mouthof a cannon, or stand in a breach where he is almost sure to perish, cancommand that soldier to give him one penny of his money; nor the generalthat can condemn him to death for deserting his post, or not obeying themost desperate orders, cannot yet with all his absolute power of life anddeath dispose of one farthing of that soldier's estate, or seize one jotof his goods; whom yet he can command anything, and hang for the least disobedience.Because such a blind obedience is necessary to that end for which the commanderhas his power -- viz., the preservation of the rest, but the disposing ofhis goods has nothing to do with it.

John Locke 140.It is true governments cannot be supported without great charge, and it isfit every one who enjoys his share of the protection should pay out of hisestate his proportion for the maintenance of it. But still it must be with his own consent --i.e., the consent of the majority, giving it either by themselves or theirrepresentatives chosen by them; for if any one shall claim a power to layand levy taxes on the people by his own authority, and without such "consentof the people", he thereby
"invades the fundamental law of property", and "subverts the end of government". For what property have I in that which another may by right take when he pleases to himself?

John Locke 141. Fourthly. The legislative cannot transfer the power of making laws to any other hands, for it being but a
delegated power from the people, they who have it cannot pass it over to others. (APPNote: The United Nations Has No Powers because the United States having limiteddelegated powers cannot abrogate new powers nor transfer powers, not existingor contrary to the peoples rights, of the united states, to others)The people alone can appoint the form of the commonwealth, which is by constitutingthe legislative, and appointing in whose hands that shall be. And when thepeople have said, "We will submit, and be governed by laws made by such men,and in such forms," nobody else can say other men shall make laws for them;nor can they be bound by any laws but such as are enacted by those whom theyhave chosen and authorized to make laws for them.

John Locke 142.
These are the "bounds" which the "trust" that is put in them by the societyand the law of God and Nature have set to the legislative power of everycommonwealth, in all forms of government.

First: They are to govern by promulgated established laws, not to be varied in particular cases, but to have one rule for rich and poor, for the favourite at Court, and the countryman at plough.

(APP Note: See these exact words in the Rights of the Colonists)

Secondly: These laws also ought to be designed for no other end ultimately but the good of the people.

Thirdly: They must
not raise taxes on the property of the people without the consent of the people given by themselves or their deputies.

And this properly concerns only such governments where the legislative is always in being,or at least where the people have not reserved any part of the legislativeto deputies, to be from time to time chosen by themselves.

Fourthly: Legislative neither must nor can transfer the
power of making laws to anybody else, or place it anywhere but where the people have



Cascade Siskiyou National Monument

Welcome to Pacific Westcom. The Pacific West Coast's premiere US Pacific West Command Web Center Station for US Pacific News, US pacific west weather, US pacific west coast travel, US pacific west coast entertainment usarpac and world wideaccess to the best international & US sites on the Web

Serving the US West Coast States of Alaska, Canada, Washington, Oregon,California and Mexico. US West North to US West South, we have the informationyou need! Just take a look at these sites at your finger tips!

Remember us: Pacific West com.com

US Pacific Westcom your One Stop US Pacific West Command Web Station for US Pacific News! Take Command of your US fleet! Click here for frames . Cgsc Afcea Amc Mtmc Usarpac Uspacom Medcom Forscom Usasoc; a PWN weather sponsored link



Christian Science Monitor News, Your Major International News Central Command Center:

The Links you want:

Editorial News Press Release, Local News, National News and International Press Releases:

Freedom and Patriotic Sites, Declaration of Independence and Constitutional Sites;


Pacific News, World News

CDF Patriots Directory - If you do not see the above control header, Click Here first for This Site's Control Frames and Intro to CDF the Civil Defense Force Command Center CDFCC.

CDF Patriots Independence

CDF Patriots Bill of Rights

CDF Patriots Constitution 1

CDF Patriots Constitution 2

CDF Patriots Founders

CDF Patriots Flag

CDF Patriots Governments

CDF Patriots Bureaucracies

CDF Patriots Military/Militia

CDF Patriots Police

CDF Patriots American

CDF Patriots Politics

CDF Patriots Freedom

CDF Patriots Laws

CDF FBI/CIA/Civilian

CDF Patriots Foreign Policy

CDF Patriots Education

CDF Patriots Facts

CDF Patriots Freedom Morality

CDF Patriots Response Reply

CDF Patriots Member

CDF Patriots Demands

CDF Patriots Militia Be Prepared not Paranoid

CDF Patriots Militias

CDF Patriots Immigration

CDF Patriots Links

CDF Patriots ContactCDF


No Names No Numbers Tax

The only True Freedom and True Patriot Tax - Do not confuse with any other.

This Tax System removes the heavy burden and bureaucracy associatedwith TaxationÕs present Tax implementation and Tax collection.

Do not be fooled by scams such as the Fair Tax, Equal Tax, Free Tax, Patriot Tax and other so called new systems of Taxation.

The No Names No Numbers Tax:

Removes the IRS and places the States and Counties in Full Control.

Removes Most Federal Bureaucracies from the States

Removes Federal Tax Burdens within States out of the States;

Removes Tax Paperwork;

Removes Heavy Tax Crimes and Penalties,

Removes Invasive Government Snooping into your personal Business,

Removes Tax Compliance Costs.

The No Names No Numbers Tax is Part of the States Liberty Bill

True Republican Patriots, Patriots of the Oregon Patriot Party

New Automobiles, New Sports Cars, Race Cars, New 4x4 Four Wheel DriveTrucks and Vehicles

Landship, Taylor Landship - Simply Powerful.

A New Car, A New car Company, No one builds and automobile like Landship


Landship - Simply Powerful

Cartoons

Pro Toonerz, Professional Cartoonist Cartoons and Comics for every occasion

Pro Toonerz, Professional Cartoonist Cartoons and Comics for every occasion.

THE COMICS SECTION . COM Free Daily Comics, Have a Cup of Laughter

Green Springs the Series

Green Springs the Animated Series
Licensing Merchandise.Products Green Springs the Animated Series Cartoon Character Licensing



Richard Taylor Cartoonist, Illustrator, Author Poet and Graphic Design

Richard Taylor, Poems and Poetry
Logos Business Logos

Cartoon Directories

Pro Toonerz T2 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing andWeb sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T3 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing andWeb sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T4 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing andWeb sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T5 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing andWeb sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T6 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing andWeb sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T7 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing andWeb sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T8 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing andWeb sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T9 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing andWeb sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T10 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory
Pro Toonerz 2 T11 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T12 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T13 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T14 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T15 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T16 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T17 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T18 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory

Pro Toonerz T19 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory
Pro Toonerz T20 Professional Cartoonist Cartoons, Comics, Cartoon Character Licensing and Web sites Directory

Intellectual Political Commentary with Peep and Cheep

Green Springs Productions Cartoon Character Licensing, Green Springs Cartoon Character License and Green Springs Character License:

Green Springs Character License 1 Dipo the Dinosaur.


Green Springs Character License 2 Twiple the Bright Yellow Bird.


Green Springs Character License 3 Jiblet the Jerbil (Gerbil)


Green Springs Character License 4 Sqwalker the Ostrich.


Green Springs Character License 5 San the Snail.


Green Springs Character License 6 Woyb the Worm.


Green Springs Character License 7 Snug the Slug.


Green Springs Character License 8 Breadmaker Turtles, Wheat, Wholesome and White.


Green Springs Character License 9 Nuts the Inventor.


Green Springs Character License 10 Snick and Rittle, a snake and his rattle.


Green Springs Character License 11 Tubs the Turtle.


Green Springs Character License 12 Andy the Ant.


Green Springs Character License 13 Bobby Bear.


Green Springs Character License 14 Camelot Caterpillar and Curt the Chameleon in Caterpillar Candy Cocktale.


Green Springs Character License 15 Dee the Damselfly and Darnel the Dragonfly in The Dragon and the Damsel.


Green Springs Character License 16 Ebert E. Ermine in Eight EÕs.


Green Springs Character License 17 Flamingos, Fish, Pheasants, Frogs, Ferrets, FallowFawns and Frog Feet in February Fracas.


Green Springs Character License 18 Gary Grouse and Glen Gladious Gator in The Gator and the Grouse.


Green Springs Character License 19 Herbert, Hemit and Hugo Hog in Hog Holiday Hoedown.


Green Springs Character License 20 I the Fly and Imil in I the Fly.


Green Springs Character License 21 Jim, Jethro, John, Jesse, Josh, Jeff, Jamie, Joseph, Jake, Justin and Joey Johnson in Jerboa Juneberry, Jelly Berry Jam Jamboree.


Green Springs Character License 22 Katie the Kangaroo, Citchy the Cat and the Kangaroo Rats in Kites and Kangaroos.


Green Springs Character License 23 Lu Lu Llama and Lorilie Llama in Limes, Lemons and Llamas.


Green Springs Character License 24 Moose, Mastodons, Mammoths, Mammals and Marbles in the Mysterious Marble Mountain.


Green Springs Character License 25 Norman Newt and Newman Nuthatch in Nutmegs.


Green Springs Character License 26 Obrian Opossum, Olga Opossum, Oranges, Orange Blossoms and Otters in October Opossum.


Green Springs Character License 27 Paul Porcupine, Pete Porcupine and Pauline Porcupine with Petunias in Porcupines and Petunias.


Green Springs Character License 28 Q Quetzal and Kay Quetzal in Q the Quetzal.


Green Springs Character License 29 Ruben Russle the Rabbit in Red Ripe Rutabagas.


Green Springs Character License 30 Samuel Sheldon Sapsucker, Sanford the Sardine and Steve the Shark in Seemingly E - Sea.


Green Springs Character License 31 Tookee Toucan, Teto the Tortoise, Tobias Timothy Turtle and Tish the Tadpole in The Turtle and the Tortoise.


Green Springs Character License 32 Unger the Umbrette and the Urchin in The Umbrette and the Urchin.


Green Springs Character License 33 Vivian Yvonne Vanessa the Vixen and Virgil the Vole in Vivacious Vestige.


Green Springs Character License 34 William Wilfurd Waxwing Wayne Witiwer Warbler in The Wayward Waxwing and the Whimsical Warbler.


Green Springs Character License 35 Yellow Bellied Bunting and Yellow Caterpillars in The Yarn of the Yellow Bellied Bunting.


Green Springs Character License 36 Zena the Zebra, Xylophones, the Xiphoid Xerus and Zithers in Zebra from Zambezi.


Green Springs Character License 37 Knobze and Snobze the Detectives.


Editorial PoliticalCartoons

NASA Kids The Non Aligned SpaceAssociation; Kids Cartoons and Cartoon Character Licensing. NASA Space CenterMission Control Flight Path Command License and Universe Licensing MerchandiseSpace Educational Control Free Space
NASA Kids License; TheNon Aligned Space Association Kids Cartoons and Cartoon Character Licensing.NASA Space Center Mission Control Flight Path Command License and UniverseLicensing Merchandise, Control Free Space
NASA Kids Products;The Non Aligned Space Association Kids Cartoons and Cartoon Character Licensing.NASA Space Center Mission Control Flight Path Command Product License andUniverse Licensing Merchandise Price Free Control Free Space
NASA Kids Games; The NonAligned Space Association Kids Cartoons and Cartoon Character Licensing.NASA Space Center Mission Control and Flight Path Command Products, Licensesand Universal Licensing Merchandise Price Kids Games, Control Free Space

American Patriot Party

Oregon Patriot Party, Educating True Freedom, America at its best

American Patriot Party National and States Web Forum for the True American Patriot Party

Facts and Perspectives, what everyone should know about life and this world

Books

Final Voyage of the Central America, by Normand E. Klare, Non fiction historical adventure from actual accounts of the tragedy at sea, Sunken Gold and Treasure Ships

SS Central America, by Normand E. Klare, Non fiction historical adventure from actual accounts of the tragedy at sea, Sunken Gold and Treasure Ships

Herndon and Gibbon, First North American Explorers of the Amazon, by Normand E. Klare, Non fiction historicaladventure from actual accounts

Klare Taylor Publishers, First North American Explorers of the Amazon, Final Voyage of the Central America, by Normand E. Klare, Non fiction historicaladventure from actual accounts

The Ships of Children, Children's and Teen's High Seas Adventure for the Adventurous Sea Scout seeking wind, sail, ships and sea, a ocean going seafarers adventure of sea battles, pirates, gold treasure, savages and fun adventure; enjoyable for the whole family

Fine QualityBooks and Audio, Final Voyage of the Central America, Herndon and Gibbon,First North American Explorers of the Amazon, Ships of Children, AmericanPatriot Party, Bible of American Freedom and Patriotism, Fact and Perspective,No Names No Numbers True Patriot Tax, 27 Tongue Tailored Toon Twisters ChildrenÕsgifts games and more


West Coast to Coast Business and Web Directory

Pacific Westcom West Coast Directory, The Best of the West Coast to Coast

Private Property Rights

Jenny Creek Private Lands Coalition

Jackson County OregonBusiness Directory

Pacific Westcom Medford Oregon Directory, Medford, Oregon Business

Pacific Westcom West Coast World Link Directory, The Best World Links, World Cams and World News

Bluegrass Music, Mountain Music

Greensprings, Green Springs Blue Grass and Cascade Mountain Music Blue Grass Band

Free Radio

Live 555 Free Radio, The Best of Every Musical Era, All Fast, All Fun, All Family Music,Your Alive with Live 555

KZAP, Educational and Funny, Real News, Real Radio

Aquaculture and Aquaculture, Hatchery and Processing Facilities

Green Springs Aquaculture, Fine Quality Rainbow Trout, Aquaculture wholesale, Retail, Fresh Dressed Trout, Pond Stocking, Hatchery Fingerling through Trophy

Home Schooling Books

Jensen's Grammar Wordsmiths Home School Grammar Books, Education in Grammar at itÍs Best

Journey Through Grammar Land, Grammar Land Home School Grammar Books

Photography

William Miller Photography, Professional Photography, Portrait, Political, Commercial, Scenic and Sports; An Eye for Excellence, A Skill for Perfection

Holiday Gifts, Christmas, Fathers Day, Birthday Presents, Special Occasions

Bear Bun Back Scratchers, Black Bear, Brown Bear, Blue Bear, Big Bear or Baby Bear; If You aint got Bear Bun, you aint got Buns!

Klamath Falls Adjudication and Water Right News

Klamath Falls Adjudication

Jenny Creek Privatelands Coalition, Private Property News Update

Commercial Properties: Santa Barbara, California Commercial Real Estate Property, Commercial Lots, Commercial Land, Commercial acreage, Commercial Rentals, Commercial Properties.

Santa Barbara Commercial Property Commercial Lots and Commercial Real Estate Land and Acreage

Los Alamos, California Commercial Real Estate Property, Commercial Lots, Commercial Land, Commercial acreage, Commercial Rentals, Commercial Properties.

Los Alamos Commercial Property Commercial Lots and Commercial Real Estate Land and Acreage

Santa Maria, California Commercial Real Estate Property, Commercial Lots, Commercial Land, Commercial acreage, Commercial Rentals, Commercial Properties.

Santa Maria Commercial Property Commercial Lots and Commercial Real Estate Land and Acreage

San Francisco, California Commercial Real Estate Property, Commercial Lots, Commercial Land, Commercial acreage, Commercial Rentals, Commercial Properties.

San Francisco Commercial Property Commercial Lots and Commercial Real Estate Land and Acreage

Los Angles, California Commercial Real Estate Property, Commercial Lots, Commercial Land, Commercial acreage, Commercial Rentals, Commercial Properties.

Los Angles Commercial Property Commercial Lots and Commercial Real Estate Land and Acreage

Santa Ynez, California Commercial Real Estate Property, Commercial Lots, Commercial Land, Commercial acreage, Commercial Rentals, Commercial Properties.

Santa Ynez Commercial Property Commercial Lots and Commercial Real Estate Land and Acreage

Los Olivos, , California Commercial Real Estate Property, Commercial Lots, Commercial Land, Commercial acreage, Commercial Rentals, Commercial Properties.

Los Olivos Commercial Property Commercial Lots and Commercial Real Estate Land and Acreage Science and Interesting fun Links:

IMA Interstellar Militant Antagonizers
UFO Unidentified Flying Objects, Locators, Clean No Hassle Space shipand Planet Strafing, Spirit, Spirits. Paranormal, Ghost Busters, Ghost KillersStalking and Exterminators for Free Quick Quality Ecto. Exterminations, SpookKilling and Confinement. IMA your Spiritual and Celestial beings Contact,Negotiation and, where necessary, Elimination and Confinement Specialists,when you have invisible and unseen problems arrise, Do not be Spooked, callIMA

Seeking God

SPRI, Spiritual Physics Recognition Institute, Private Science at Home Experimentation and Research Forum

Freedom

Cgsc Afcea Amc Mtmc Usarpac Uspacom Medcom Forscom Usasoc USA US, US Army IMA, Barracks, Docks, US Navy, US Air Force, US Marines, Green Barrett, Special Forces, Navy Seals, WW I - World War 1 one, WW II World War 2 two, Command, Base Center; Oregon, California, Fire Department, LA Fire, Santa Anna, US Forestry, Oregon State, College; A PWN weather sponsored link county, city and state.

Zoning and other Regulations that obstruct truly free enterprise but for those who can purchase or manipulate them are a bane to true liberty and aboveall other factors in this country create unemployment.

Zoning does not control growth, Zoning and regulations control people; and forces free enterprise into the open arms of a government bureaucracy where growth is untethered; Increasing social bureaucratic dependency and increasing the burden on free enterprise and a free people.

 


True American Freedom begins with education of the Declaration of Independence and the 40 Grievances that define 40 definitions to recognize tyranny in government.Have you read them?

Read the Declaration of Independence now at the Oregon Patriot Party http://www.oregonpatriotparty.com

Educating civilians, military, militia and the world about true American freedom defined by the founding fathers of this country.

Oregon Patriot Party of the American Patriot Party and CDF, educating true freedom and justice, one Patriot at a time.


Thomas Jefferson:

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.

I do not add 'within the limits of the law', because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual. ~~"American Patriot Party National Headquarters


True American Patriots, True American Patriotism. The Democratic Republicof Jefferson - Inalienable Rights, States Rights, Local Control

 


Subjects Covered:US Monument News Directory Report: US United States Government, BLM, US Bureauof Land Management, Department of the Interior,  US Federal Governmentand the Cascade Siskiyou National Monument. National Environmental News andEvents. Klamath Falls Adjudication, Klamath Project and FERC Federal EnergyCommission on the California Oregon boarder.  Water, power, fish passage,Indian, ranchers, farmers and irrigation district disputes news and information.USA boarder water law and policies. Laws on water rights and grazing rights.Lease land grazing Federal Oregon and California environmental law disputeson monument's policy in the west. Politics of Private Land Rights, FederalLand Rights, Federal Water Rights and Private Water Rights. Jenny Creek PrivateLands Coalition, Cascade National Monument News Directory Reports: US UnitedStates Government, BLM, US Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, US Federal Government and the Cascade Siskiyou National Monument law andupdate. National Environmental News and Events. Klamath Falls Adjudication,Klamath Project and FERC Federal Energy Commission on the California Oregonboarder.  Water, power, fish passage, Indian, ranchers, farmers andirrigation district disputes news and information. USA boarder water lawand policies. Laws on water rights and grazing rights. Lease land grazingFederal Oregon and California environmental law disputes on monument's policyin the west. Politics of Private Land Rights, Federal Land Rights, FederalWater Rights and Private Water Rights. US Monument News Directory Reports:US United States Government, BLM, US Bureau of Land Management, Departmentof the Interior,  US Federal Government and the Cascade Siskiyou NationalMonument. National Environmental News and Events. Klamath Falls Adjudication,Klamath Project and FERC Federal Energy Commission on the California Oregonboarder.  Water, power, fish passage, Indian, ranchers, farmers andirrigation district disputes news and information. USA boarder water lawand policies. Laws on water rights and grazing rights. Lease land grazingFederal Oregon and California environmental law disputes on monument's policyin the west. Politics of Private Land Rights, Federal Land Rights, FederalWater Rights and Private Water Rights