rect
American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State
Patriot News Network.jpg
Patriot Party Political.jpg
American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT.jpg
Patriots Site Reports.jpg

American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State

American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State

American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State

American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State

American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State

American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State

American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State

American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State

American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State


American Patriot Party, Oregon Patriot Party, American Patriots Party us


News: Occupy Wall Street: Ignorant Poor VS Ignorant Corporations and not a mention about "STATE BORN EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES" which they both promote and cause the problems the Occupiers supposedly are against. Learn More about the hazards of allowing EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES to exist. And why the Founders warned against them.

NEW PRODUCTS! .... 625+ Page Reprint of Blacks & Pomeroy on Water Rights 1897 !!! - Learn Validity of Common Law Water Right Laws Prior to, During Transition and Relevance as States Begin to Arrogate Powers over Water Rights and Private Property. Cites Historical Common Law Cases. Color Page Separation for Easy Reference; A MUST READ!!!.

Don't forget your APP Collectors Patch!



Site Index:

SITE MAP LINK

National American Patriot Party and Oregon Patriot Party Home

What Makes us Different

What People are Saying about the American Patriot Party

MEMBERSHIP


Put our Suggested Reading Documents on your Blackberry or Laptop with this .pdf version!!!

For our Suggested Reading .pdf file, Click this Image:
American Patriot Party Suggested Reading.PDF














State Parties
State Party Guidelines


American Patriot Party
News Letters


2006 Division of Power
Virginia Ratifying Convention of 6-16-1788
2007 Fundamental Laws
Foundations of Essential Rights
2008 Republics & Representation
Need for Small Republics
2009 Privileges & Contracts
Dangers of Privileges
2010 Wards of the State
Corruption into Slavery
2011 Pretense of Authority
Authority Only By Compact
2012



Articles:

1.)
True American Patriotism

2.)
Freedom, Public Opinion
Consent and the Law Against Condemnation of Any Man's Property.


3.)
Socialism as Defined by the American Patriot Party

4.)
Slavery

5.)
Voluntary Slavery

6.)
Existence of Slavery

7.)
Distant Legislatures

8.)
American Patriot Party Platform and Goals

9.)
American Patriot Party and Oregon Party  Stands on Issues

10.)
Curbing Enterprises of Ambition and Establishing Barriers against Socialist Collectives.

11.)
Foundations of Inalienable Rights

12.)
Universal Definition of Political Left and Political Right

13.)
Stand Against National ID - either for Man, Animal or other property



Patriots Papers Index:

Magna Carta 1215
English Bill of Rights 1689
Locke Church, State & Man 1689
Locke Civil Government 1689
Rights of the Colonists 1772
Witherspoon Confederation 1774
Massachusetts Declaration
Virginia Declaration of Rights
Witherspoon Providence 1776
Declaration of Independence 1776
Articles of Confederation 1777
Founders Letters of Intent
Conventions and Debates 1787
U.S. Constitution 1788
Bill of Rights & Amendments 1791
Virginia - Kentucky Resolutions 1798


Great Resources for Founders Documents

University of Chicago, Founders Constitution
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders /indexes/indexes.html

Constitution.Org
http://www.constitution.org


Federal Law Documents:

Reference Center:
http://www.usa.gov/Topics/Reference_S helf.shtml#Laws

Federal Law Research:
http://www.usa.gov/Topics/Reference_S helf/Laws.shtml

Code of Federal Regulations - Electronic
http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx ?c=ecfr&tpl=%2Findex.tpl

Cornell University - Federal Law:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/federal



Patriots Organization Committee
Oregon State Elections
Secretary of State Notice
Join the American Patriot Party
Volunteer Patriots
Fundraising

Oregon Patriot Party
American Patriot Party


Bills
The States Liberty Bill

Patriots Party Products
American Patriot Party Graphics
Party  Political Cartoons


APP on Facebook!



 Ron Paul Endorsement

        Ron Paul Endorsements.jpg
 

American Patriot Party
Membership Products

Now Available:

American Patriot Party Products Patriots Products

 Large Round 4 5/8" High Quality
American Patriot Party
Embroidered Collectors Patch
 

The Emblem the left fears most.
Free, self sufficient and armed

See Link for details.
and More Products


Compare Differences between the American Patriot Party and other political parties.


American Patriot Party Endorsements:

The American Patriot Party Endorses Candidates outside it's own party that most closely follows our aims and goals for a free country.

In 2004, the Patriot Party gave Limited Candidate Endorsement for President Michael Peroutka  of the Constitutional Party, for President. Note: The Oregon Patriot Party had abstained from that endorsement. In 2008, Ron Paul was endorsed by a number of states through the primaries; Upon endorsement of Chuck Baldwin by Ron Paul, some states members followed with their votes.

Our endorsement for 2012 is again Ron Paul.

Review the National American Patriot Party  website
Candidates Page and see who, why, and what American Patriot Party members are voting for.

See the Patriot Party solution to the two party monopoly, The American Patriot Party is made up of registered Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats who wish to see the true intent of the founding fathers of this country realized. 



The two candidate voting system:

This system allows the voter to vote for the candidate he believes will be the best person for the job;

If that person does not get enough votes, his second choice is recorded.

This allows the voter to vote his conscience first without throwingaway a crucial vote.

An example would be, if you believed Ron Paul was the best person for the job as president but did not want to loose a vote to another Republican Candidate that may or may be more popular  You would simply vote Ron Paul as your first choice and the more popular candidate for second choice;

If Ron Paul did not carry the votes necessary to be a contender, you would not loose anything;

 This is because  the second choice vote would automatically  engage and be counted that candidate.

This innovative voting system allows for greater options to vote your conscience.

          ------------


Taxes

The American Patriot Party and OregonPatriot Party, Championing the "No Names No Numbers Tax";

 The
States Liberty Bill, Federal Government Patriot Tax System Reform Bill, Zoning Abolishment Bill; The Private Person and Property Security Bill and the Freedom Responsibility Bill  which places the responsibility on every court and government agency at every level to have the power to refuse laws that it deems contrary to the Inalienable Rights guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence as intended by the founders letters and constitution of this country without reprimand by federal, state, county or other entity, thereby empowering the responsibility defined in the Declaration of Independence wherein it states clearly:

"That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the
CONSENT of the governed; that, whenever "ANY FORM" of government becomes destructive of THESE ends, it is the "right" of "thepeople" to "alter" or to "abolish" it, and to institutea new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as tothem shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness...

         --------------

Note, that when this was written, it did not mean within the constraints of the existing law or within the constraint of a government procedure such as a voting system; As they stood outside and apart from their own present government at that time, and had no "legal" government.

They were individuals making a stand.

This imposed a power of a people, any group of people; not of a, orany, government.

The
Declaration of Independence defines

1.) a free individual his first right and duty and;

2.) 40 Definitions of a Tyrannical government in which to impose your first right and duty upon.

The Constitution's purpose is to fully,  in compliance with the Declaration of Independence's foundation, limit the powers of the Federal Government.

This is the sole purpose of the Constitution; and it does not, in any way, overwrite the foundations and duties laid out by the Declaration of Independence.


 

Clearly as written in the Constitution Article VI, that the Constitution is bound by prior Oaths which are Engagements of the People, declared in The Declaration of Independence, and all agreements set forth in the Confederation; All those and future laws subject ultimately to those oaths which are "Engagements" of and with the People presented in the Declaration of Independence, "Not Withstanding".

Constitution: Article VI: All Debts contracted "and "Engagements" entered into (Oaths and Declarations), before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution as under the "Confederation". This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be "made" in >>>"pursuance thereof" ; and all Treaties (Oaths and Declarations) "made", or which shall be "made", under the Authority of the United States, shall be supreme Law of the Land ...."

Note that any law made under the Constitution is limited to laws within the "DELEGATED" Powers; Further, the Supremacy Clause was limited to those delegated powers and restricted the federal government from arrogating ANY new power. The federal legislature - federal government cannot create laws outside those very limited delegated powers, nor can they "arrogate" ANY new powers.

Police powers are limited to the 10 miles square of Washington DC The Supremacy Clause is a limited power; It cannot exceed the delegated powers.... EVER.

These are clearly defined by the Founders in the Constitutional Debates in the Ratifying Conventions of 1788.

See the
Full Day Debate that establishes these in our American Patriot Party News Letter - Division of Power.

Oregon State Political Campaign and American Patriot Party National Campaign Elections Division Headquarters.

Political State Parties of the AmericanPatriot Party. The True Jefferson Democratic - Republican Party.

Oregon State Elections Division and State Election figures.


AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF THE INDEPENDENT AND UNITED STATES:

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ALABAMA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ALASKA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF AMERICAN SAMOA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ARIZONA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ARKANSAS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF CALIFORNIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF COLORADO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF CONNECTICUT

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF DELAWARE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF FLORIDA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF GEORGIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF GUAM

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF HAWAII

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF IDAHO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ILLINOIS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF INDIANA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF IOWA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF KANSAS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF KENTUCKY

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF LOUISIANA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MAINE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MARSHALL ISLANDS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MARYLAND

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MASSACHUSETTS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MICHIGAN

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MINNESOTA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MISSISSIPPI

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MISSOURI

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MONTANA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEBRASKA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEVADA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW JERSEY

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW MEXICO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW YORK

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NORTH CAROLINA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NORTH DAKOTA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF OHIO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF OKLAHOMA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF OREGON

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF PALAU

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF PUERTO RICO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF RHODE ISLAND

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF SOUTH CAROLINA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF SOUTH DAKOTA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF TENNESSEE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF TEXAS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF UTAH

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF VERMONT

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF VIRGIN ISLANDS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF VIRGINIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WASHINGTON

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WEST VIRGINIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WISCONSIN

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WYOMING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

American Patriot.

Home of the American Patriots of the American Patriot Party.

 


Patriot News Reports.jpg Patriots News Report.jpg Patriots Political News.jpg American Patriot Freedom.jpg American Patriot Reports.jpg Americans Patriotic Report.jpg American Patriotism Report.jpg American Patriots Reports.jpg Americans Patriot Reports.jpg
Patriots Todays News Political Commentary

American Patriot Third Party

Greene Revolutionary War3.jpg

American Patriot Party.

Welcome to the American Patriot Party
National Headquarters.


Patriots, American Patriot Party Patriots, Oregon Patriot Party Patriots          American Patriot Party American Patriot Party Official Web Site  
VOTE

American Patriot Party Candidates,
Elections and National Party Organization Center;

Oregon Patriot Party State Headquarters;
Oregon Patriot Party State, County Candidates Endorsement ElectionsDivision.

The True Patriots Party, The American Patriot Party. Educating Patriots and Defending Freedom, one Patriot at a time. See also Special Reports at far right>

Join the American Patriot Party!

We Know Freedom.

Why waste your time and money
with modern publications, ignorant authors, organizations, talk show hosts and others, that distort the Founders documents, our rights, laws and Constitution; When access to the trueand factual documents are right here...

FREE of charge for EVERYONE to read!
Join NOW!

 

American Patriot Party,
State Parties Organizations.

The American Patriot Party, StateOrganization Map:

American Patriot Party Patriots, Oregon Patriot Party Patriots, News American Patriot Party, Patriots Party, American Patriots, Patriot, USA

Welcome to the new National American Patriot Party web site. The American Patriot Party has taken on some changes. The Oregon Patriot Party has assumed the National American Patriot Party role in guiding states to develop their states parties.  For Election Information See
Candidates Section.

Previously active states:
(green) need to voice reactivation (blue). Several states so far are under organization.

Organization of State Parties

New Organizers: may request interest in establishing state parties in green or gray states.

People interested in establishing or reestablishing their state parties should review this web site and become educated in the Declaration of Independence and Originating Founders Letters prior to 1776 that defined the intent of freedom;

Further, to become versed in your own state's elections laws prior to making a commitment with this party in starting a state party.

Each state is responsible for developing their own party.

Do not expect anyone to do it for you.
See our State Party Guidelines Page.

Be realistic. Understand this will be a lifetime process, do not expect too much too soon. Development of your particular state party may takemany years. 100% of establishing a party is believing in its goals andalways being there when necessary.

If you choose simply to be a member, your commitment will be the same.

"Statesmanship", as defined by this party, is first defending certain inalienable rights as defined by the Declaration of Independence and it's Originating Founding Fathers of and prior to 1776; Then to the concerns, that are within these parameters, of their constituents of their state.

This sets the solid foundation for this party's establishments and goals.

This also limits change from outside forces that water down the true intents of those who fought to give us the freedoms we have.

Our candidates will follow the party, the party follows and reestablishes the true intent of a free community, state, and country as defined in the Declaration of Independence and letters of the Originating Founders of Freedom.
 

CONSTITUTIONAL COFFEE

Constitutional Debates- June 14, 1788 -
Virginia Ratifying Convention.

James Madison: "... The Constitution has taken a medium between the two extremes, and perhaps with more wisdom than either the British or the state governments, with respect to their "ELIGIBILITY" to office.

They can "FILL" "NO" new "offices" created by themselves,

 > > > "NOR"  > > >

(***APP-WAKE UP!***)

  > > > "OLD ONES"  > > >

of which they

  "INCREASED THE SALARIES"."


------------

***APP CONSTITUTIONAL CAFFEINE:

Would this not keep LEGISLATORS from being reelected
"back" into their office...

if they had
 
RAISED THEIR SALARIES
IN THE PREVIOUS TERM???

Clearly it would.

Madison Continued: "... After having heard a variety of principles developed, I thought that on which it is established the least exceptionable, and it appears to me "sufficiently well guarded".

APP Wake Up:Apparently not... They simply stepped outside the "delegated" powers of the"Original Compact" which they have NO AUTHORITY (see link) to do.

This was warned by Patrick Henry.

Also see link to
Rights of the Colonists that establish that Governors have "NO RIGHT" to "seek what they please" in salaries, as it makes way for them to become TYRANTS and DESPOTS, instead of servants of society.

Mr. GRAYSON: "Mr. Chairman, I acknowledge that the honorable gentleman has "REPRESENTED THE CLAUSE RIGHTLY" as to their exclusion from new offices;"

APP Wake Up:This establishes James Madison's intent was correct and that "NEW OFFICES" also means,by the definitions given here "NOR Filling Old Ones", as reelectionto the same office for a "NEW TERM" of Officefor which the salaries were increased by the person seeking reelection to it.

 

-------------------

WARNING * WARNING * WARNING

WARNING TOTEA PARTY GOERS

FAIR TAX PATRIOTS.jpg

 

Warning; DO NOT be taken in by the attempts to establish a NATIONAL FLAT TAX, FLAT PERCENTAGE TAX, FAIR TAX, FLAT PURCHASE TAX or other ARBITRARY UNENUMERATED TAX SCHEMES!

These are
INDIRECT TAXES,  UNENUMERATED Styled taxes; The ARBITRARY flat percentage will insure and grant government money without consent prior to receiving funds; It will be no different than the income tax is now.

WORSE it will guarantee increases to governments with the increase of the private sector
WITHOUT CONSENT AND OVERSIGHT; It will EMPOWER GOVERNMENT.

The Founders understood the necessity of a DIRECT taxation; Taxes that are not arbitrary, but are DEFINED AND ENUMERATED >>>BEFORE THEY ARE GRANTED TO GOVERNMENT.

>>>>FURTHER DANGERS: Some plans combine state and federal taxation or federal taxation into one "sales tax" plan; These are EXTREMELY DANGEROUS as it is a "SHOEHORN" for the Federal government to involve itself with State and local taxation! The federal government will be come a legal "PARTY" to the taxationprocess with your state and thereby WREST CONTROL of local taxation andLOCAL REGULATIONS!!!

The FairTax allows the NEW FEDERAL oversight bureaucracy to DEFINE "what is and what is not" a business; It invites the federal government not only into your business, but into your HOME to determine if what you do outside your business, is a business. The Fair Tax is in reality a BUY, SELLor TRADE TAX.

The FairTax simply "changes the name" of the IRS to the new TAX bureaucracy name;  The FairTax proponents attempt to proclaim they get rid of the IRS, this is FALSE;

We have noticed the Flat Tax, FairTax and other such flat "percentage tax" groups attempting touse the Tea Party movement and jealousy to promote these taxes in the rallies;

Don't fall Prey to them!

There are other ways of direct taxation that will remove regulation and insure oversight and local control over taxation and stay within the original Constitutional limits; See Anonymity Tax.

See APP "Opposition Issues Page" on FairTax.

-------------------

FASCISM IS LEFT

>>>ADDITIONAL WARNING: We have heard speakers at TEA PARTY RALLIES ATTEMPTING to place Fascism as being to the FAR RIGHT; THIS IS INCORRECT. This is a "Centrist and leftist" "Ploy" to make you think we need to move to the center i.e. toward the left; This is meant to confuse;

Do not buyinto it.

Socialism and Communism and Fascism are ALL LEFT;

ALL THREE require huge socialistic bureaucracies to operate and therefore are ALL THREE, FORMS of SOCIALISM and ALL "LEFT".

Understanding that the
State of Nature under the Law of Nature to guide it are the Far Right, then Constitutional Compacts to enforce the Law of Nature are the RIGHT - Freedom and Propertyare protected;

To the
Left are Various forms of Socialism  and collectives which include Fascism and Communism; These naturally degenerate through  arbitrary power against the properties and liberties of the people.

To the
Far Left when these breakdown through ABUSES to the Law of Nature, is the temporary condition of  Anarchy which is the State of Nature without respectfor the Law of Nature, referring tolawlessness of any kind and without compacts to enforce the Law of Nature;

Anarchy is a condition that will exist until either people respect the Laws of Nature; The protections reemerge to recognize and enforce again the Laws of Nature through Constitution"s"; Or else the people allow themselves to again be enslaved under Governments of arbitrary power.

Read John Locke on Civil Government

Also Understand that Corporations, Unions, Tax supported Special interests and undelegated federal and state bureaucracies are ALL COLLECTIVES and state born "Exclusive Privileges" which should not even exist in a free country; We have been warned by the Founders to guard against their existence; they are from undelegated arrogated powers.

DO NOT CONFUSE "Exclusive Privileged" "trade" with "free trade".

YOU TUBE VIDEO>>>>>

WATCH Video speech SPECIAL REPORT #3>>>

At right on thispage, with regard to the LEFT attempting to Confuse our people; Understand the dangers we are facing!

See also:
Privileges and Contracts
 


--------------------


 

***
SEE>>>"SPECIAL REPORTS>>>"

 This page third column to right >>>
.

SOCIALISTSBEGIN THEIR TAKEOVER
of the
 EUROPEAN UNION
...

By "raising thresholds" necessary for political parties to be recognized. >>>


2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
View Past Party Election Statements  >>>

 

ALL RADIO TALK SHOWS
ASK THE  WRONG QUESTIONS

Radio talk shows rant about Debt and High income Taxes when the first issue should be How to make the Federal Government stay within it's limited delegated powers which would remove the income tax and restrain the federal governments spending AND Borrowing powers, under a republic, it must not step from the Delegated Powers under which the Republic was first created as indicated by the founders;

Not even by one step, NOR ARROGATE "ANY" new powers.


The issues that should be discussed by Radio Talk show hosts and all media are:

1.) Forcing the Federal Government to stay within the limited Delegated powers as defined and established in the
Ratifying Conventions and Original Delegated powers of the Constitution.

2.) Returning to Enumerated taxation as established in the Original Constitution; Changing from Enumerated Taxation to Unenumerated taxation IS an ARROGATION of a NEW POWER and is
EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

3.) Removal of the Income Tax and IRS and...

4.) NOT to replace it with any other
unenumerated FlatTax, FairTax or other Dangerous Flat percentage Scheme.

5.) Returning to import taxes as first established in the Constitution.

6.)
Removal of ALL STATE BORN EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES; Corporations, Unions, Tax Supported Special Interests and Undelegated (as well as federally Mandated) Federal and State Bureaucracies.

7.) Restoring the Constitution's Limits which
restricts the Federal Government from governing police outside the 10 miles square of Washington DC and restricts the Federal Government from creating or prosecuting more than the 4 crimes they are allowed to prosecute defined in the Constitution.

So long as the Federal Government continues to receive unlimited money through Flat Percentage, Unenumerated Taxation, the federal government will continue to use that Financial Power against the people.

When you hear talk show hosts avoid these foundation issues, ...

call them on it.

If they still do not understand, send them to this web site.

-------------


"INDEPENDENT BUSINESS" VS "JOBS"


Another topic that needs to be noted, is the constant selling of the need for "jobs"as if "jobs" just appear on their own; This is a "PLOY" to increase government employment and dependency;

The real topic should be on "BUSINESS"; In particular, "INDEPENDENTBUSINESS".

The rule that increases CORRUPTION and Dependency, is that when the governments are in the business of "creating" "JOBS", they will "create jobs" that are either "DEPENDENT" upon GOVERNMENT JOBS; which will burden society in one way;

Or will grant "PRIVILEGES" to or in the form of CORPORATIONS, UNIONS or Tax Supported SPECIAL INTERESTS (COLLECTIVE TITLE to PROPERTY), so that citizens will be "DEPENDENT" upon those
"State Born ExclusivePrivileges";

The rule that promotes a true Free Market Economy and Independence, is that when government removes REGULATIONS so that small "INDEPENDENT" "BUSINESSES" which have "INDIVIDUALLY OWNED TITLE" to their "PROPERTY and BUSINESS",  Then it creates "INDEPENDENCE".

So the subject should NOT be "JOBS" singular;

But FIRST "INDEPENDENT BUSINESS" and "REMOVAL OF REGULATIONS" so that "FREE ENTERPRISE"  for those with independent title will prosper; and create in "THAT WAKE", "JOBS" and TRUE independence which will follow.

APP
 























 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




























































































































 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 







































































































































The Purpose of Government
 is to Protect Private Property

READ:
 
John Locke / Samuel Adams


 

IMPORTANT - do not confuse this party with other similar named parties (such as ".org" or put "THE" in front of American Patriot Party):

Read our Welcome Summary by clicking this link, then return.
 

The American Patriot Party represented here is opposed to any and all environmental extremism or progressivism.

Such environmentalism is viewed by this party as a form of socialism which attacks the very fabric of security in ones home, papers and effects (property).

Environmental laws are a means of corrupting the individual rights of free citizens through national and international manipulation of our most cherished laws.

 

CBC 45 Minute Special Report

World Scientists Debunk Global Warming Myths;

Putting to rest the "one man invented" and "Faulty" "Hockey Stick" tree ring temperature theory.





Oregon State Party ofthe  American Patriot Party. A Free, Independent and United State PatriotsParty of the American Patriot Party. Protecting Certain, Inalienable Rights, Strengthening States Rights, Empowering Local Control.
























22 Founder's quotes will appear at 45 second intervals.

Duty of State Powers over Federal

Note Thomas Jefferson's statement in the Kentucky Resolution, that it is the States that must act to nullify by their own authority, all powers assumed by the federal government that have not been delegated to it.

James Madison also establishes in the
Virginia Resolution that to consolidate the states into "one nation" under "one authority" through exceeding the Delegated Powers, it removes the states as being a "republic", and transforms the country into a monarchy.

James Madison - Virginia Resolution:

"... so as to destroy the meaningand effect, of the particular "enumeration" which necessarily explains and "limits" the "general phrases"; and so as to "consolidate the states by degrees", into "one sovereignty", the obvious tendency and inevitable consequence of which would be, to transform the "Present Republican System"(1798) of the United States, into an "absolute", or at best a "mixed >Monarchy ".


Here it is clear the founders of freedom, the Authors themselves of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution had no intention of consolidating the states into being "one nation", nor of transferring "unlimited power" to the federal government;

The intent is clearly for numerous independent self governed "state nations". Establishing further a  very limited delegated "compact" between the states (i.e. Constitution), so to regulate in size and in powers, a "limited federal government" to serve the states at the state's will, for limited and defined Continental purposes with very limited and delegated powers

As defined by these Authors, should these delegated powers or limits be exceeded in any way,
by even one step, as Edmund Pendleton establishes, the actions as defined by Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, George Nicholas and others would be null and void; (Constitutional Debates and Viginia and Kentucky Resolutions)

The states having the immediate power, right, duty and responsibility to stop, remove and arrest any further progress.

Not only the state has this power, but also as defined by the Founders in the
Constitutional Debates, any well regulated community has the right to halt those abuses, state legislatures, county commission, judge, governor, mayor, commonwealth or community.

George Nicholas:

"...But, says he, who is to determine the extent of such powers? I say, the same power which, in all well-regulated communities,determines the "extent" of "legislative" powers. If theyexceed these powers, the judiciary will
declare it void, or else "the people" will have a "right to declare it void"

In a free country, the power is from the bottom up, established by inalienable rights.

It is presently these persons, state legislatures, county commissions, judges, governors, mayors, who are presently failing to act and use the powers they possess to arrest the powers not delegated to the federal government.

Much of this is through states and communities accepting federal bribery use of funds from non-delegated tax systems, and tax dollars the states should never have let leave the state; To have themselves set upon by numerous unwanted and unneeded programs and departments through federal mandates inorder to receive those tax dollars back for highways or otherneeded maintenance for which they could do themselves if the money had notleft the state to begin with.

--------------------

"If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the greatend of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right tofreedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man toalienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave."

Samuel Adams, Rights of the Colonists, 1772

--------------------
Patriots, Official Oregon Patriot Party Patriot Election State Patriots

Contact us regarding organizing your county American Patriot Party.

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY QUOTES:

"Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals." And: "As long as the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue they will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.... If virtue and knowledge are diffused among the people, they will never be enslaved. This will be their great security ."

Samuel Adams, the Father of the Revolution

American Patriot Party, Oregon Patriot Party, American Patriots Party us American Patriot Party, American Patriots Party, Patriots, Party, New
The American Patriot Party.CC
New Logo Notice
The American Patriot Party and the Oregon Patriot Party is for:

The "States Liberty Bill"  Established by the Oregon Patriot Party of the American Patriot Party.

The "
States Liberty Bill" of the Oregon Patriot Party has Three Parts.

First, the "
States Liberty Bill" systematically halts further growthof the federal government within the states and begins a removal of all Nonessential federal agencies and federal owned lands within the states. Thisaction is to reduce the tax burden and federal encroachments and manipulations of state and local rights.

Second, the "
States Liberty Bill" enacts the No Names, No Numbers, True Patriot Tax system to reduce the tax burdens imposed by the present tax system and eliminate federal encroachment into individuals personal and private business.

Third, the "
States Liberty Bill" will establish the unconstitutionality of zoning laws and remove all zoning from the states so to allow free growth of independent free enterprise.

This is essential to open up free enterprise, instead of the harsh regulations presently in place that force free enterprise not able or willing to toil under such regulations into the open arms of government bureaucracy and upon the backs of free enterprise to support.

The "
States Liberty Bill" establishes:

1.) Freeze on Federal Jobs: Systematic reduction of the Federal Government by placing a freeze on hiring for all nonessential federal agencies.
2.) Offer Early retirement to government employees and as nonessential offices close offer transfers to essential offices as openings become available for qualified applicants.
3.) Abolish all Zoning ordinance and bureaucracy and enact simple building laws which protectthe right to build and protect only against obvious physical encroachmentsof another's property, (See proposal) This will Free up free enterpriseand greatly reduce unemployment by expanding free enterprise.
4.) Transfer complete ownership and control of all federal lands to each of the respective states and in ownership and control of each of their counties.
5.) Abolishment ofthe Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
6.) Enactment of the
No Names No Numbers Tax System.
7.) Abolishment ofall other tax systems except use taxes and voluntary taxes such as lotteries which are to be controlled by vote. Grant amnesty to all tax debts whatsoever and remove completely all debts to the government by any person, group,entity or other from these tax systems.
8.) De-unionization of all government jobs and positions.
9.) Limiting all government income to no greater than the average salary of the county they reside, at all levels.
10.) Education Reform, state and local community control.  
11.) Maintain Social Security under new tax system (
Which See) wherein all moneys collected willbe placed in a completely separate account and physical location in eachstate from all other tax moneys. No bill or separate government agency orany other entity or person(s) will be allowed access to any funds except fordistribution to the intended recipient;
12.) Since the newtax system will collect moneys from state toll equally from the generalpublic; and federal imports (collected by states) from imports and fromforeign visitors, and not derived from income or other modes of taxation,any new money collected will be distributed equally to all US citizens atthe age of 65. All previous quarters paid under the old system will be respected.
13.) Medicare willfollow the same path as Social Security.
14.) Health and Life Insurance reform - as corporations
"are" national health care. Corporations are not free enterprise; they are regulated internal bureaucracies and a state born exclusive privilege of cartel; When large enough, they are government styled bureaucracies operating within a free country's and state's borders. If corporations operate like a social bureaucracy (which they do), they are social bureaucracies. The only difference between a state government health care system where money is pooled and held in a controlled dispersal; and a Corporate health insurance plan pooled and held for controlled dispersal (note we are not for a "national" health care "system"), is that if you miss a payment with a corporate plan you looseall your coverage and, more than likely, all the money you have put intoit;  Then refused further consideration for further policy by thatcompany (assuring the corporation of that much profit which is now no longerat risk). The person is then passed to the next company for greater insurancecosts in a highly profitable skimming system. There needs to be safeguardsset on money invested in corporate insurance so that a portion is heldfrom misuse or profit and either held in a trust account (not lost or absorbedby the corporation), transferred to the next insurance company or pooledby the state and or county for basic health care, to be held in trust tothe person who invested the money - That is if "corporate" healthcare "insurance", considered a type of national health care in and of itself by this party, is to be allowed to continue; However, as in taxes where 50% is spent on regulation to collect the other 50% in direct taxation, regulation of a corporate bureaucracy requires a government bureaucracy oversight which is a double layer burden. The issue is unlimited corporate profit and controlled government salaries, in regard to what the moneyis supposed to be used for - and that is "actual health care", not bureaucratic salaries or exaggerated profit. Ideally, any money would be pooled, with minimal bureaucratic labor (of either kind) or profit before it reaches its patient destination; and drawn under strict guidelines (owing to patient privacy) into and distributed by the private medical care field with built in localized private non-corporate elected physician oversight (in fund distribution)  as needed by each patient. If  moneyspent toward health care now, bypassed, even in part, the bureaucraticlabor and corporate insurance profit schemes, there would be more thanenough for county and state basic health care for those in need. In 2004- the latest year data available, total national health expenditures rose7.9 percent -- over three times the rate of inflation (1). Total spending was $1.9 TRILLION in 2004, or $6,280 per person - if a portion of this amount was placed directly in interest bearing accounts on a ongoing basis, we believethat a financial foundation for health care can be realized very quickly;A combination of law to establish efficient procedure; and percentage inand of distribution of invested money toward health insurance, and private and localized field professional oversight and ethical standards are the goal. Non-medical bureaucratic middle men, private and government, are the problem; By-passing them under the present system, is part of the solution.
15.) Implement judicial, and legislative reform from local level, to supreme-court system.
16.) No public office positions shall be held that are not voted on by the people. State and Federal positions that are located by office in any county must be voted in bythat county; If duties extend into other counties, by all effected counties,but not further than can be feasibly administered by that one individualsubject to voter approval. No sweeping jurisdictions shall be granted anyindividual or to extend beyond any state.
17.) All powers ofcondemnation except during an actual time of war will have no power byany government agency, entity or person; This position and stand of thisparty is solidly founded and established in the
Rights of the Colonists: "First, "The first fundamental positive law of all Commonwealths or States, is the establishing the legislative power; as the first fundamental natural/law also, which is to govern even the legislative power itself, is the preservation of the Society. "6 " Secondly, The Legislative has NO RIGHT to absolute arbitrary power over the lives and fortunes of the people:..." " Thirdly, The supreme power CANNOT Justly take from ANY man, ANY PART of his property without his "CONSENT", in person OR by his REPRESENTATIVE.--" ; and if condemnation occurs in war which is the sole purpose of any condemnation - actually limited to the 10 miles square of Washington DC - which the amendment and where just compensation is described - and where all other condemnation is prohibited by the right of the people to be secure in their person papers and effects, all properties shall be returned afterwards. Wherein public safety is at risk by condition only, (not by esthetics nor by simple public will) the act of quarantine to general public will be established until any problem is repaired; Only when eminent public hazard exists, will temporary condemnation be allowed to be enacted for those things built upon the land or in the land, but not the land itself, nor fines imposed.
18.) All non military government, non geological - weather recording and non emergency employees must use automobiles or other public modes of transportation. No public expenditured use of expensive helicopters or private or government aircraft will be allowed to be owned or operated by non military, non geological -weather recording or non emergency government agencies. Nor shall any governmentpersonnel of any non military, non geological - weather recording or nonemergency government agencies be allowed to share use of such aircraft unlessin a time of emergency. Nor shall any government or government personnel acceptdonations or assistance from private enterprise or personnel except in timesof national or natural emergency.  Thereby reducing greatly unnecessaryexpenditures and private enterprise manipulation of our government and ourgovernment employees.
19) Abolish federal EPA and retain each states controlled DEQ, thereby removing a double layered bureaucracy and unneeded tax burden..
20.) All lottery money to be ear marked for education and state emergency funds only.
21.) All state parks to be funded by use taxes alone and controlled by counties.
22.) To reduce unemployment in this state to its citizens, all employment to Parks or other state and county government agencies located within any county, will first be offered to persons having resided in the county applied for a minimum of 2 years. 
24.) Except military, the total number of years for any public service will be 4 years thereby excluding public service as a profession and placing it for what it is, public service. Skill from that service can then be used in the private industriesand workplace or furthered education.
25.) No federal, state or county employment shall be offered to non citizens of the United States.
26.) Election reform. To allow for voting for the candidates of choice for public office(s), and not a candidate of limited choice, elections will allow two votes, onevote for the candidate you feel would best represent your position anda second choice vote for a second candidate so if your first choice candidatewas unable to secure enough votes to compete in the election process, thesecond vote will be counted. This will relieve any fears of loosing a voteto a more popular candidate that is near to your stands on issues by votingfor a candidate that most closely represents your stand on issues. Thiswill also eliminate having to only have the choice of voting for "the lesserof two evils" as the saying goes.
27.) The United Nations being not an entity but simply a pact, the United Nations will be eliminated as a power in and of itself and simply a four walled room to discuss how independent states and countries will react independently on any given issue. All UN materials and equipment and personnel will be disbanded to the country of their origin and the UN emblem stricken from all use. All Countries and states will remain as independently responsible for their own actions.
28.) In protectionof United States Sovereignty, No foreign country or citizen may own United States soil. All land now owned will be granted life time leases. Such leases, in time of war against countries who have citizens who possess such leases, may be subject to loss and public auction of such leases and all properties on United States soil for which moneys will go toward the war effort. Should such foreign citizens become United States citizens, the land shall be deemed owned by such person or persons. So long as there is any foreign memberof any entity that has any lease in such lands, no ownership will be granted.
29.) No military from any other nation or UN or any other pact forces shall be allowed to establish bases or operate within the US airspace, waters or on US soil.
30.) All gas Use taxes to be used for roads only.
31.) Unlimited access to and freedom to drill on all private lands for gas, oil and other minerals by any individual. Thereby removing the manipulation of the industries, special interests and the government to control or create bought protectionism for exclusive rights to drill such that has been attempted in the CARA Bill where Oil Industries pay governments and special interests to condemn land in the lower 48 states for the exclusive rights to drill oil in Alaska; insteadof working for a truly free enterprise which should be everyone's goal ina free country; This will allow for a true free market value of oil gas and minerals.


Boundaries of Freedom:

The only freedom you do not have in a free country is the freedom to take certain inalienable rights and freedoms away from others; Relinquish your own essential natural rights (voluntary slavery); Nor accept the relinquishment of essential natural rights by others (slavery).

To do so is treason to a free people and their country;

The ultimate treason, is to do so under the guise of "just doing ones job" by placing a unquestioning duty to "ones job, duty or law", whatever it may be, that is not in compliance with certain inalienable rights; and over ones first right and duty which is to protect those certain preexisting inalienable rights in the people which are Supreme law.

--------------------------

Thomas Jefferson:

 "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.

I do not add 'within the limits of the law', because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual~~"

--------------------------

Defining the Difference:

The Founding Fathers of True Freedom are not the same as theFounding Fathers of Federalism.

The Founding Fathers of Freedom define certain inalienable rights and place safeguards to protect freedom as done in the Declaration of Independence and their letters which define their intents
(ie. Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry and others).

The Founding Fathers of Federalism lay the foundations for future corruption and even in their writings question absolute freedom of speech (ie. Hamilton the Federalist papers).

Know the difference between Blind Nationalism, which is defined by borders, symbols such as flags and blind patriotic rhetoric;

 And True Freedom, which is Clearly Defined in Certain Inalienable Rights.

Understand that it is the absolute unchangeable meaning of certain inalienable rights that defines freedom;

For if the meaning behind the symbol or border changes, it renders the symbol meaningless and the borders of a free country empty, powerless and bare to the ruthless ambition that is in and of tyranny.

Know the difference between true peace that is respected of true freedom;

And the false peace that is of subjugation as that found of Englandand other falsely acclaimedfree countries mis titledas part of a free world for which their citizens have no certain, inalienable, rights.

Know that total democracy is total socialism, blown with the winds of manipulated change and socialism's progression.

Freedom is defined, certain, inalienable; and established so in theoriginating founders letters defining the intent; and in which men
"assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them..." The Declaration of Independence.

--------

Join the American Patriot Party of your State and help make America Free as was intended by the Founding Fathers of Freedom and a Free country!

Richard Taylor
Chair
American Patriot Party.CC
American Patriot Party of Oregon
--------------------------

Bringing you the True Intent of Freedoms Founders

 *** Here Below is a sample segment from a discussion had on the American Patriot Party Web Forum covering foreign wars, 12th Grievance and 2nd Amendment Rights definitions and the founding fathers intent; "Military Issues"/ "Hamilton and the Common Defense"

The discussion yielded letters of the founding fathers intent of "Civilian Militias" power over the "Standing Army" - i.e. Military

Make sure to review carefully the words below of James Madison:

--------------------------
--------------------------

 START Segment -  In response to requiring the written words Declaration of War prior to engagement

 "........ I would endorse the words a Declaration of War;

However if we are attacked, we "are" at war....

It is needless to say.

And if during a initial exchange the congress is obliterated .... we can't wait for the dead to speak in which to act in defense.

So what is necessary for us to establish our stand on war and action?

Foreign wars present a issue of what the end should be; simply a European Democracy? I think not.

We stand for American Freedom of certain, inalienable, rights.

If we are to fight a war, these are what we need to leave behind inthat country, not simply another
socialist country to be consumed by the next controlling socialist dictator or socialist leadership.

The Responsibility of the people we leave there, need to be
educated in the difference and the ability to defend it.

Disarming the nation we conquer or "liberate", is not the way.

This simply prepares the people to be controlled again.

The people need to be educated on freedom and trusted in the responsibility.

------------------------

Review also the 12th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence which establishes civilian powers and military as this is a important establishment of those reasons given by the founders.

12th Grievance (Defining Tyranny): "He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power".

-----------------------

The division of power and strengths establishes where the control comes from and where it is necessary to make changes.

In this country, or a Truly Free Foreign country it should be the same.

When the federal government consumed the states, it usurped controlof states defenses presented in the 37th and 39th Grievances of the Declaration of Independence.

But not so based on
Constitutions Limitations as it is a document that is suppose to protect all agreements and oaths of the Declaration of Independence of which are oaths that the Articles Confederation were also bound, Documents for which the Constitution without, would never have existed.

See the Grievances

----------------------

We need to look at the whole picture to establish our stand on war.Where the control of defense lay and the limits, defined by the Foundersthat have been placed on the US Congress and U.S. Military; As there are,in fact, limits set by the Founders

a.) Federal "Policing" is limited to the 10 miles square area of Washington D.C. for the limited purpose of protecting congress as they work - See Constitutional Debate;

b.) Military is limited in force and power to 1/25th of all citizens able to bear arms; See James Madison below.

 
c.) Military cannot be used to implementor enforce laws within the U.S.; See Constitutional Debate;

d.) The Military must be invited by the state for thelimited purpose of protecting one state from invasion of another; and toprotect the republican form of government if attacked.
See Constitution.


These are just some things to keep in mind:
 

----------------------------
 

Founding Fathers Quotes:


President George Washington presented his mistrust in the federal government very clearly and defined the true intent where the powers should lay, and that is in the hands of the civilians.

 In response to a proposal for gun registration George Washington in 1790 said:
"Absolutely not. If the people are armed andthe "federalists" do not know where the arms are, therecan never be an oppressive government."

The right to conceal from the federal government; The purpose clearly stated to have the power to put down an oppressive federal government. This is clearly in line with the 12th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence. This defines the Intent of the 2nd Amendment and the intent of the Founders.

Elbridge Gerry, a representative to Congress from Massachusetts during the debates overthe Bill of Rights
"What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty ... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins."
Lets review other words of James Madison with regards to militias and standing armies; The purpose and the power ratio between them:

 

James Madison who wrote the Constitution together the Bill of Rights:

"The highest number to which a standing army can be carried in any country does not exceed one hundredth part of the souls, or
one twenty-fifth (1/25th) part of thenumber able to bear arms.

This portion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.

To "these"
would be opposed

(APP: indicating that the "militia" is to be a "opposing force" to the standing army as well as that of foriegn enemies)

a militia amounting to near half a million
CITIZENS witharms in their HANDS,

"officered by men chosen from "among themselves",

(not by government or the standing army)

fighting for "their" (the citizen / militia's) common liberties and united and conducted by government"S" possessing their (the citizen / militia's) affections and confidence.

It may well be doubted whether
a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a "proportion" of regular troops (i.e. standing army).

Besides the advantage of being
armed, it forms a barrier against the "enterprises of ambition", more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.

The governments of Europe are afraid to trust
the people with arms.

If they did, the people would surely shake off the yoke of tyranny, as America
did.

Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be inactual possession than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors."


 John Adams inA Defense Of The Constitution:

"Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion ... in private self-defense."

Samuel Adams, John Adams' second or third cousin, during Massachusetts' U.S. Constitution ratification convention in 1788.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States whoare peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."

Jefferson:

"The strongestreason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as alast resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government."

Part of the proposed Virginia Constitution, in 1776.

"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms."

Jefferson quoting Cesare Beccaria — a Milanese criminologist whom he admired who was also hiscontemporary — in On Crimes and Punishment;

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nordetermined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaultedand better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than toprevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidencethan an armed man."

Thomas Paine from his Thoughts On Defensive War written in 1775:

"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."

George Washington January 7, 1790 :

"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teethand keystone under independence. From the hour the Pilgrims landed,to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable. The very atmosphere of firearms "everywhere" restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor with all that's good."

George Mason when the Constitution was being debated:

"To disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them."

-----------------------

We need to also understand both the purpose of a war and what it is we will leave behind.

True Freedom is what we should fight for and educate to establish in any situation when war is set upon us;

This way we will be less likely to have to return to fight another dictator or assailant; as the people we leave will be strong internally to deal with the problem themselves.

END

See also special report 3 at column at right

----------------------
----------------------

For more on this review AmericanPatriot Party Stand on Issues.

We Welcome People for the USA! The American Patriot Party Supports Private Property Ownership, Private Control and Protections against government regulations of private property.

Richard Taylor
Chair
Oregon Patriot Party
American Patriot Party


Please Note: This party has NO association with American Patriot Party .ORG.

The American Patriot Party that we represent, does not support environmental socialism or progressivism against freedoms or against certain inalienable rights.

We are opposed to any international manipulation of our country, our states, our counties or our communities from collective environmental activism of any kind.

We are further opposed to the consumption and control of American soil by environmental trusts and organizations, or the transfer of state lands into the hands of the national government.

We are also opposed to any US activism or government manipulation of other countries and their environments.

 We do support "simple education" to allow each individual to make their own choices regarding their own land.



American Patriot Third Party


Notice:The American Patriot Party.CC web site will be moving our domain to ournew server. During this time you may have difficulties entering by the
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc link.

You will still be ableaccess the full web site through our
http://www.pacificwestcom.com/oregonpatriotparty link.

Use Side and Text Links (Top banner and "Welcome Home" Linkwill direct to the .CC site; So for now use the above link or back, to backto this page.

If you look for us on Google, you will find several access pages until the.CC page and website is fully operable.

After our move, some links may be inoperable from the .CC domain aswe make necessary changes. Simply use the "Pacificwestcom"link until those issues are resolved and the new links established.You may want to bookmark it.

Thank you in advance for your patience as we make this move.

Remember to visit and "Like" us on our NewFacebook page!

Also follow us on our New TwitterPage

Now back to your regularly scheduled programming...

----------------------



New!

American Patriot Party Auto Window Decals.

Great gift and Stocking Stuffer for the Constitutionalist.

AmericanPatriotPartyDecals.JPG

If the PayPal links do not open our American Patriot Party PayPal pagein your browser, simply right click on link and choose open page in a "NewBrowser Window" or "New Browser Tab".

This should correct the problem. Thank you!

Large 6" Window Decal:



Medium 4.5" Window Decal

Small 2.75" Window Decal

10 - 1 3/8" Letter Seal Decals


*Checks or Money Orders send to: American Patriot Party National Headquarters, PO Box 637, Ashland, Oregon 97520



Ron Paul Jousting Windmill.jpg

2012
ELECTIONS
THE CONSTITUTION MATTERS

LET'S GET RON PAUL AS PRESIDENT WHO WILL OBEY IT!

IGNORE THE REST
VOTE THE BEST!

Support RON PAUL at: RON PAUL 2012.com!

Follow the Campaign at
Campaign for Liberty!   Become a Member and Get Active!

Top Stories:

Ron Paul Sweeps Up Delegates in Iowa, Nevada, Maine, Louisiana, Washington, Missouri!!!

Ron Paul Sweeps Nevada - Takes 22 of 25 Delegates

Ron Paul Supporters take Nevada State Republican Chair and Secretary positions!

Keep up to date on the Ron Paul Revolution at:
 
THE DAILY PAUL . com


Keep up to date on the REAL DELEGATE COUNT
http://thereal2012delegatecount.com



Archives:

Ron Paul Strategy Working - BELIEVE IT!!!

Ron Paul Winning by END DELEGATES:

 Paul
CNN Admits - Ron Paul 2nd Place in  Delegates - Strategy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=t2YJ1Y9sTEY&feat ure=endscreen



Here is Why ! CNN proves Walk in Voters Super Tuesday say RON PAUL!:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiecPJcfHDg&feature=rel ated


Brokered Convention Still possible for a Ron Paul Win! (click link)

Most Second Place Finishes! (click link)



Ron Paul Holds a Steady Keel Through Primaries

 WHILE the other three republican presidential candidates swing from first to last place - blindly loved or hated -  the media plays with the peoples ignoranceof who these fake republican candidates really are.


Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich - All Big Government Liberals proven by their records!

RINO's!

Republicans In Name Only!

All three of these candidates have voted for:

a.) Gun control
b.) Big Government programs
c.) Big Government contracts
d.) Federal Regulations against private property

And there are actually republicans out there that would vote for any of these three?????!!!

WAKE UPPEOPLE!!!

Look! Don't be blinded by big government media, corporations and unions; or those talk show hosts who blather in their favor, when those talk show hosts are supported by those very same corporations!


LOOK AT RICK SANTORUM'S CORRUPT RECORD!!!:

***     Padding his own wallet as a corporate lobbyist at the expense of taxpayers;

***     Voting to RAISE the debt ceiling five times;

***     Voting to DOUBLE the federal Department of Education;

***     Voting with liberals like Ted Kennedy on multiple occasions in support of Big Labor's radical agenda;

***     Urging more federal involvement in housing with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac;

***     Voting to create a brand new, unfunded entitlement, Medicare Part D, the largest expansion of entitlement spending since President Lyndon Johnson - creating $16 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities;

***     Endorsing liberal Big Government RINOs like Arlen Specter over conservatives.  Of course, Specter later became a Democrat and worked hand-in-glove with President Obama to pass his radical agenda;

***     Voting for Sarbanes-Oxley, which imposed dramatic new job-killing accounting regulations on businesses;

***     Supporting raising taxeson oil companies, which directly costs Americans more money out of theirpockets at the gas pump;

***    
Voting for gun control;

***     Voting to give Social Securitybenefits to illegal aliens, while voting against an additional 1,000 borderpatrol agents;

***     Voting to give $25 million in foreign aid to North Korea;

***     Voting to send hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood - the nation's largest provider of abortion ­ and to hand out hundreds of billions of dollars in foreign aid to enemies of Israel
But unlike many of my other establishment opponents, Rick Santorum isn't even trying to sweep his Big Government record under the rug.

WAKE UPPEOPLE!

WIPE THE SLEEP FROM YOUR EYES!!!

Rick Santorum, as with Mitt Romneyand Newt Gingrich, are

VERIFIABLE SOCIALISTS!!!

---------------

How about Mitt Romney?

Mitt Romney would allow the Canadian Pipeline to lower gas prices...

But would Mitt Romney take away federal regulations, so to allow any land owner in the United States to drop an oil well on their own small 50' x 50' lot?

..... NO!

That is becausehe is a progressive environmental fanatic and Corporate patsy;

He will only allow oil exploration and production that can be easily controlled and monitored by the federal government and that can be profited by large corporations.

He does not want true free trade any more than the oil  companies, as that would mean TRUE COMPETITION and lower profits for the Corporations.

How about Taxes? Mitt Romney says he would lower taxes, But would he work get rid of the income tax altogether?

...NO!

Because that would take away the federal powers that the income tax is used to force MANDATES on the States!;

...as well as take away financing big government CONTRACTS to Big Corporations.

How about GUNCONTROL?

Mitt Romney LOVES GUN CONTROL and advocated GUN CONTROL in his own state!

Mitt Romneyloves the United Nations.
Mitt Romney loves international treaties even if they invade our sovereignty.

Mitt Romney is a Typical Socialist!

Two steps forward, one step back.
 




How about Newt Gingrich?

House speaker and Bill Clinton's buddy, he allowed liberal, environmental and regulations to prosper throughout the Clinton administration and encouraged Clinton's WAR on the WEST.

Newt Gingrich raised taxes.
Newt Gingrich loves the income tax.
Newt Gingrich loves expanding federal bureaucracies.
Newt Gingrich loves using mandates on the states
Newt Gingrich loves national monuments.
Newt Gingrich loves using federal power.
Newt Gingrich loves GUN CONTROL.
Newt Gingrich loves Government Unions.
Newt Gingrich loves Corporate Contracts.
Newt Gingrich loves international treaties even if they invade our sovereignty.
Newt Gingrich loves using federal police in the states.
Newt Gingrich loves bargaining with yourrights.

Congress even kicked him out for his corrupt practices!

Is there any invasion upon your rights that these three would not impose if they "felt" it "necessary" to benefit their own will or political position?

 

WAKE UP!!!

The news media is selling you and your rights down the road!

------------

There is only one true republican conservative running for president that will protect your rights and obey the Constitution

Ron Paul.
 


--------------


 

Ron Paul WINS Straw Polls!

Read Lew Rockwell on Ron Paul and Polls; What is, and is not necessary to win.

"Iowa Independent" says Ron Paul leads the pack in Power rankings! http://iowaindependent.com/63503/iowa-2012-gop-presidenti al-power-rankings-time-is-not-on-their-side

11-10-11 CNBCKathryn Jean Lopez says:     
"I think this might have been Ron Paul's best debate. "
http://blog.chron.com/rickperry/2011/11/winners-and-losers-fro m-the-cnbc-gop-debate/

Conservative IOWA Talk show host Jan Mickelson endorses Ron Paul!
http://www.caffeinatedthoughts.com/2011/11/iowa-conservativ e-talk-show-host-jan-mickelson-endorses-ron-paul-privately

Conservative Talk show host Jerry Doyle for Ron Paul
http://www.dailypaul.com/186606/on-air-now-jerry-doyle-has- come-out-for-ron-paul

Ron Paul WINS AGAIN!!!

Ron Paul WINS Illinois GOP Presidential Straw Poll by another HUGE MARGIN!!!
 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/05/ron-paul-wins-illin ois-gop-presidential-straw-poll/
The Illinois Republican Party established that
Ron Paul WINS the statewide illinois straw poll November 05, 2011 that determines voters preference for the GOP presidential nomination.

Congressman RonPaul won the poll with
52% percent of the vote. Paul won in both online and total statewide votes. There was more than 3,600 votes, which far surpassed the number of voters in such large states as Ohio, Florida and California that held straw polls earlier this year. Over 2000 of which voted for Ron Paul as their choice for president!


*WINNER Annual Values Voter Summit Straw Poll in Washington, D.C.; By a HUGE MARGIN!!!

Ron Paul 37%
Herman Cain 23%
Rick Santorum 16%
Rick Perry 8%
Michele Bachmann 8%
Mitt Romney 4%
Gingrich 3%
Huntsman 0%


Ron Paul Florida Debate Highlights:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsrxdF5byQM

*WINNER   Florida Fox NewsPoll - Fox News  Pulls it's OWN Poll Chart to hide Ron Paul leading Mitt Romney by 11,000 Votes!!!; (Fox News Screen Shot Source - Infowars): We would be willing to change this declaration to 2nd place, if  Fox News will post the unchanged poll numbers AND Chart. Until then, here is the poll screen shot:

RonPaulWinsFLStrawPoll.jpg

Florida Fox News Republican Presidential Debate Poll Results, Showing Ron Paul the Debate National Opinion Winner;

Results Corresponding with Fox News Graph:

Mitt Romney 22.89% - 16,073 Votes
Rick Perry 12.8% - 8,989 Votes
Newt Gingrich 6.99% - 4,906 Votes
Ron Paul 39.27%- 27,573 Votes!!!
Rick Santorium 1.44% - 1,014 Votes
Gary Johnson 1.95% - 1,366 Votes
Herman Cain 10.81% - 7, 592 Votes
Jon Huntsman 1.59% - 1,118 Votes

Info Wars Links to Articles and the full size screen shot of Fox News Florida Republican Debate Poll:

http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-poll-ron-paul-wins-orlando- debate/

http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-pulls-poll-showing-ron-pau l-debate-victory-claims-mitt-romney-won/

Herman Cain's (Hermy ObamaCain) win in the Florida Republican PartyStraw Poll  can hardly be considered a win for conservative Republicans;

It looks like there is a group of  983 Dependent Republican Government Union Floridians that love Cain's proposed
OBAMACAIN Buy, Sell and Trade Tax policy; A UNENUMERATED FLAT PERCENTAGE TAXATION that will guarantee money to government, Unions, Wasteful corporate contracts, tax supported special interest groups, and undelegated state and federal mandated bureaucracies.....

I would say not just a few good 'ol Union, government employee and government corporate contract recipient boys and girls worked their way into that vote.... .

So much for federal limitations set out in the Original Constitution.

---------------

 

Ron Paul National Polls Winner!

By just looking at the numbers inthe major national opinion polls; Ron Paul is the overall polls and opinionwinner by a wide margin in numbers of votes cast across the United States.


*WINNER California Republican Straw Poll taking 44.9% of the votes cast.

Ron Paul (374 - 44.9%)
Rick Perry (244, 29.3%)
Mitt Romney (74, 8.8%)
Michele Bachmann (64, 7.7%)
Jon Huntsman (17, 2.0%)
Herman Cain (15, 1.8%)
Newt Gingrich (14, 1.7%)
Thad McCotter (7, 0.8%)
Rick Santorum (7, 0.8%)
Gary Johnson (2, 0.2%)
Fred Karger (1, 0.1%)
Write-ins (15, 1.8%)

*WINNER of CNBC Televised California Republican Presidential Debate Poll by 75% of 7000+ votes in two hours before CNBC pulleddown the poll to keep it from being seen!!!


*WINNER
2011 Conservatives Choice at CPAC (two consecutive years)


*WINNER 2011 Louisiana Republican Leadership Conference Straw Poll

Ron Paul 612
Huntsman 382
Bachmann 191
Cain 104
Romney 74
Gingrich 69
Palin 41
Santorum 30
Pawlenty 18
Johnson 10
Roemer 9
McCotter 2

*
Ron Paul Statistical Tie for "First Place"  witha mere 152 votes separating Bachman as they split the votes in the Iowa Caucus Straw Poll.


IOWA Straw Poll Results:

Results of the Iowa Straw Poll in case you haven't actually seen them:

1.  Michele Bachmann (4823, 28.55%)
2. Ron Paul                      (4671, 27.65%)

3. Governor Tim Pawlenty (2293, 13.57%)
4. Senator Rick Santorum (1657, 9.81%)
5. Herman Cain (1456, 8.62%)
6. Governor Rick Perry (718, 3.62%) write-in
7. Governor Mitt Romney (567, 3.36%)
8. Speaker Newt Gingrich (385, 2.28%)
9. Governor Jon Huntsman (69, 0.41%)
10. Congressman Thad McCotter (35, 0.21%)



BUT LOOK at This IOWA Topix / Google Republican Presidential Debate National Opinion POLL!

Below Orlando, Florida Republican Party Presidential POLLING MAP & ARTICLE; 

Google the story,
"look at all thatRon Paul Green" or this RonPaulForums.Com link

Google / Topix Iowa Straw Poll
Updated Figures as of 9-25-11

6,288 Active Cities - Updated - 8,039
24,265 Total Votes - Updated 44,191

Ron Paul - 11,516 !!! - UPDATED 28,034!!!
Gingrich 4889 - Updated - 5,920
Cain 2570 - Updated - 3,225
Romney 1941 - Updated - 2,516
Bachman 1909 - Updated - 2,415
Santorium 858 - Updated - 1,048
Huntsman 323 - Updated - 452
Pawlenty 259 - Updated - 337


R3publican Story and Poll map:

http://r3publican.wordpress.com/2011/08/12/who-won-the-fox- debate-poll-map-is-ron-paul-green-tonight/

Ron Paul Forum Alternate Poll map Link

GoogleRonPaulIowaStrawPoll.jpg










 


*WINNER 2011 New Hampshire Young Republicans Straw Pole! 46%  for Ron Paul and only 10% for 2nd place MittRomney.




MEDIA ATTEMPTS RON PAUL BLACKOUT!

Other News: Left wingand Corporate Right Wing (Fox and others) media, is avoiding mention of Ron Paul who is the clear front runner, for fear of fanning the flames Ron Paul has ignited in the people who understand that the Constitution is the only answer to bind down the federal government, stop their wasteful practices and remove burdensome regulations that keep communities and free enterprise from prospering. 

Ron Paul's obvious momentum is unquestionable and his understandingof Constitutional matters unmatched; This worries the status quo of bigspending Democrats and Republicans.

The Media is making a clearly transparent attempt to prop up the weakest and least experienced candidates to lessen the danger to Obama, or if  necessary, establish a patsy; Their invented news reports skip from Bachman to Perry and Romney without so much as a mention of Ron Paul's name who split the Votes almost evenly in the Ames Iowa Straw Poll;

This is a clear tactic where the media purposely play to the elbow rubbing Democrats and Republicans to promote those who are the most ignorant to true constitutional matters; such as Romney, Perry, Bachman who will be theeasiest to manipulate if they make it to the White House.

Ron Paul, clearly the front runner in the battle for freedom and limited government, is the only real candidate with a unquestionable track record as the champion of the Constitution. The people would be well served in giving their
support to his campaign.

BLACK OUT THIS.
 

APP

LOOK OUT!
for the
Liberal Plants!

Rick Perry's long past in the Democratic Party and past campaigning for Al Gore, causes republicans  to back away; as the truth be known!.

Rick Perry's life time Democrat and liberal leaning and "sudden" finding of "Constitutional religion"  and change to the Republican Party just before running for president smells of a "Plant" by the left.

Mitt Romney'sGlobal Warming speeches drop his poll numbers drastically.

Rick Gore, Mitt Gore and Al Gore....

The three liberal Stooges!

And Now,BuySell&Trade Flat Tax Everything for bigger government... Hermy ObamaCain!


And can you believe peoples memories are so short?!..... Gingrich are you serious?!!!

Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/10/armey-clinton-a nd-gingrich-tra.html

Least we forget the "intelligent idiot", Newt Gingrich, who rubbed elbows with Bill Clinton for years and accomplished NOTHING in either protecting or returning our lost rights from the federal government. Speaker for how long?! Clinton Raked the west with Newt and his spineless buddies kissing up to the Democrats. All Newt knows how to do is talk well, he doesn't "do" anything. His speeches are full of meaningless babble and double talk. "If", "maybe" "we could", "would be nice"...on and on and on..." Newt is a STATUS QUO politician and nothing will change with such an "intelligent" idiot in the White House. Every idea he comes up with has the federal government tiedtightly to it and to you. Just another Democrat in a Republican t-shirt.

Don't be deceived by the Status Quo good'ol boys club in Washington; They want a yes man, and Newt Gingrich has the word YES branded on his forehead.

Conservatism means nothing without Constitutionalism, and only one candidate promotesthe Constitution;

That candidate is
Ron Paul.

-------


Rasmussen Poll Says 76% of Tea Party members will vote for RON PAUL!!!;

Ron Paul,
The TRUE Tea Party Favorite!
 

-------


Orlando, Florida, Republican Party Presidential Debate 9-22-2011 Review


Ron Paul was the true winner, because his message was clear and concise.

By limiting thefederal government to only it's limited DELEGATED powers, itwould not be able to grant exclusive privileges that would hinder or suppressfree trade, or stand in the way of true independent business.

The economy wouldgrow because government would not be where it was never meant to be.

The issue is not "JOBS"; the Issue is unhindered independent free "BUSINESS"; "Jobs" will simply be the result.

When you hear "jobs" by the status quo Republicans and Democrats, it is because they want to maintain peoples dependency on large collectives (collective title) whether it is government & Unions or state born exclusiveprivileged corporations (which are "fictitious" individuals in law - butare large social collectives in fact);

The last thing collectives want is true free (actual) independent (title) trade as that would compete with them. An example is that Oil Companies have always hated competition from "Wild Cat" private oil companies.... nothing has changed.

Perry and Romney are just status quo politicians that love collectivism and the corruption that follows...Romney makes global Warming Speechesand Perry actually campaigned for Gore as a democrat; They only use catchphrases that "hint" of Ron Paul's stands to confuse voters so that theycan get their vote... If any of the others get in, it will be statusquo, all over again.

Let's not let that happen....

We have the RARE Opportunity to vote for a true Constitutionalist.

Promote and VOTE:

       RON PAUL for President!

 

VIDEOS

 

 

Ron Paul Florida Debate Highlights:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsrxdF5byQM

LPAC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JNhHg4hhg4&NR=1

Review on Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWiCY5FaA0U&feature=p yv

Alex Jones Ron Paul tipping Point
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=hnqMovlETmk

Michael Savage Interviews Ron Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=dqw5nEmvnho

Ron Paul Straw Poll for President of the United States

Straw Poll Results Summary

The ones the media hasn't told you about:

2nd Ron Paul
­ New Hampshire GOP 2012 Straw Poll (1/22/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! DC CPACStraw Poll (2/10-12/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! OnlinePhoenix Arizona Tea Party Straw Poll (2/27/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! CombinedPhoenix Arizona Tea Party Straw Poll (2/27/11)
3rd Ron Paul­ Onsite Phoenix Arizona Tea Party Straw Poll (2/27/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! Republican Liberty Caucus of California Presidential Straw Poll (3/20/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! NewOrleans Republican Leadership Conference Straw Poll (6/16-18/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! ClayCounty Iowa Republican Party Straw Poll (6/19/11)
2nd Ron Paul­
Statistical Tie for First Place! Ames Iowa Straw Poll (8/13/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! NewHampshire Young Republicans Straw Poll (8/20/11)
2nd Ron Paul­ Georgia State GOP Straw Poll (8/27/11)
3rd Ron Paul­ Maryland GOP Straw Poll (9/9/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! Pre-Debate Cincinnati Tea Party Straw Poll (9/12/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! Post-Debate Cincinnati Tea Party Straw Poll (9/12/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! California GOP Straw Poll (9/17/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! DC Values Voter Straw Poll (10/7/11-10/9/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! LA County RPLAC Straw Poll (10/13/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! Charleston County Republican Party (10/18/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! OhioGOP Swing State Straw Poll (10/22/11)
1st Ron Paul­ Des Moines Iowa Voters NFRA Presidential Straw Poll (10/29/11)
1st Ron Paul-WINNER! Des MoinesNon-Iowa Voters NFRA Presidential Straw Poll (10/29/11)
2nd Ron Paul­ West Alabama Straw Poll (10/29/11)
1st Ron Paul­ WINNER! IllinoisGOP Straw Poll (11/5/11)

As reported on ronpaulforums.

American Patriot Party.CC


----------

DANGERS AND STATUS QUO CANDIDATES

Regarding the folly of following candidates that intend to continue the status quo of maintaining the size and invasiveness of the federal government, such as Herman Cain, Mitt Romney and others;

The problem with Herman Cain, is that he works within the (UNconstitutional) system;

His history shows that he would treat government as a "business" and not as a "servitude";

This is the exact problem we have now, because when you operate a "business", you will naturally protect the "business" first (i.e. the government bureaucracy), not necessarily the consumer (the citizens);

Cain's 9-9-9 tax plan proves this intent.

When you operate a "servitude" under a "free republic", which is the correct way to run a free government, first you must obey the principles and limitations established in the "ORIGINAL COMPACT" that the republic was first formed:

John Locke:

136. Secondly, the legislative or supreme authority cannot assume to itself a power to rule by extemporary arbitrary decrees, but is bound to dispense justice and decide the rights of the subject by promulgated standing laws, 11
(APP Note: See these exact words in the Rights of the Colonists)

137. Absolute arbitrary power, or governing without settled standing laws, can neither of them consist with the ends of society and government...

138. Thirdly, the supreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent.
  (APP Note: See these exact words in the Rights of the Colonists) For the >>>>preservation of property being the "end of government" (i.e. the PURPOSE of Government)

155. It may bedemanded here, what if the executive power, being possessed of the force ofthe commonwealth, shall make use of that force to hinder the meeting and actingof the legislative, when the ORIGINAL constitution or the public exigencies require it? I say, using force upon the people, without authority, and "contrary to the trust" put in him that does so, >>>is a state of war with the people, who have a right to reinstate their legislative in the exercise of their power. For having erected a legislative with an intent they should exercise the power of making laws, either at certain set times, or whenthere is need of it, when they are hindered by any force from what is sonecessary to the society, and wherein the safety and preservation of thepeople consists, the people have a right to remove it by force. In all statesand conditions the true remedy of force without authority is to oppose forceto it. The use of force without authority always puts him that uses it intoa "state of war as the aggressor", and renders him liable to be "treatedaccordingly".

194. Their persons are free by a native right, and their properties, be they more or less, are their own, and at their own dispose, and not at his; or else it is no property. Supposing the conqueror gives to one man a thousand acres, to him and his heirs for ever; to another he lets a thousand acres, for his life, under the rent of L50 or L500 per annum. Has not the one of these a right to his thousand acres for ever, and the other during his life, paying the said rent? And hath not the tenant for life a property in all that he gets over and above his rent, by his labour and industry, during the said term, supposing it be double the rent? Can any one say, the king, or conqueror, after his grant, may, by his power of conqueror, take away all, or part of the land, from the heirs of one, or from the other during his life, he paying the rent? Or, can he take away from either the goods ormoney they have got upon the said land at his pleasure? If he can, then allfree and voluntary contracts cease, and are void in the world; there needsnothing but power enough to dissolve them at any time, and all the grantsand promises of men in power are but mockery and collusion. For can therebe anything more ridiculous than to say, I give you and yours this for ever,and that in the surest and most solemn way of conveyance can be devised,and yet it is to be understood that I have right, if I please, to take itaway from you again to-morrow ...
." Relate this to US Land Patents absolute granting of properties and the Attempt of the Federal Government to condemn such land (or water by common law attached to the land) later, or the state to condemn such property after giving consent to adjudicate such transfer by authority of the United States by which it was a party, orto create new regulations upon it after granting it with none; To encircle that land in national monument and control the inroads and water, or to regulate limits to anything with regard to it, or to arbitrarily tax it into debt and thereby rendering the land not owned but rented, when no taxes were in established at the receiving of it, or to tax it without consent, or tax withoutconsent for things built upon that property to improve its value, or raisedupon it to derive sustenance and earnings from his labors, or derive anysuch without consent from those he wills it to. And you will find the neitherthe federal government, nor the state government has no power to do so, norhas any power of such been delegated to it by the original compact(s). Foronce property is possessed of a person, it is any governments duty to protectit, and not to devise a design to wrest it away after all rights had beenreleased ; As this clearly established by Locke that the protection of propertyis the "purpose of government" and the "reason" that the person enters intosociety.

222: "...whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from "any farther obedience", and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence. Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear, folly, or corruption, (APP Note: See this in Samuel AdamsStatement within the Rights of the Colonists, 1772:  "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.") ....endeavour to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other, (Such as under undelegated/ mandated federal powers or the United Nations) an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this "BREACH of TRUST" they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty, and by the establishment of a new legislative (such as they shall think fit), provide for their own safety and security, (APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence) which is the end for which they are in society.

243. To conclude. The power that every individual gave the society when he entered into it can never revert to the individuals again, as long as the society lasts, but will always remain in the community; because without this there can be no community -- no commonwealth,
which is contrary to the ORIGINAL agreement;


Samuel Adams - Rights of the Colonists: "

When Men enter into Society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demand and insist upon the performance of such conditions,
And previous LIMITATIONS as form an equitable "ORIGINAL COMPACT".--



Under our COMPACT, all taxes must be enumerated and consensually accepted before being collected, and only after taking a consensus of the population so everyone knows how much will need to be collected from TARIFFS.

Constitution Article 1, Section 9. (Original Compact)

No Capitation, or OTHER direct, Tax shall be laid, UNLESS in "Proportion to the Census" or "Enumeration" herein >>>>>>"BEFORE" directed to be taken.

Since the income tax is an arrogated power exceeding the limits of the delegated power of enumerated taxation, it remains unconstitutional because the federal government is expressly prohibited from arrogating any new power and the amendment and ratifying process (i.e. a MEANS to make changes) was limited to making changes only WITHIN the DELEGATED powers; and can "NOT take ONE STEP" beyond.

Amendment XVI (Compare to Article 1 Section 9 of the ORIGINAL COMPACT)

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regardto any census of enumeration.



Now lets look at the two things the federal government can collect taxes for:

See Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788;

George Nicholas: > that this "GENERAL WELFARE" was united, "NOT"to "the general power of legislation", but to the >particular power> of laying and collecting taxes, imposts, and excises, for the "PURPOSE" ofpaying the "DEBTS" and providing for the "COMMON DEFENCE", that is, that they could raise AS MUCH money as would pay the DEBTS and provide for the "COMMON DEFENCE", in >>>"consequence of this power". The clause which was affectedly called the sweeping clause contained "NO new grant of power"
......If I understand it right, NO "new" power can be exercised.

Edmund Pendleton: "...With respect to the necessity of the ten miles square being superseded by the subsequent clause, which gives them power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers VESTED (i.e. Very LIMITED and DELEGATED) by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof, I understand that clause as NOT going a "SINGLE STEP BEYOND" the "DELEGATED powers". What can it act upon? Some power given by THIS Constitution. If they should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the "DELEGATED powers",

but can by >>>>>>>"NO MEANS" depart from them,


>>>>(N)OR "ARROGATE" "ANY NEW" powers; for the >>>PLAIN LANGUAGE of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give "effect" to the >>>"DELEGATED" powers".



Also, government employees cannot "seek what they please" .....Union involvement however allows government employees to "seek what they please";

Samuel Adams - Absolute Rights of the Colonists 1772:

....."In the state of nature men may as the Patriarchs did, employ hired servants for the defence of their lives, liberty and property: and they should pay them reasonable wages. Government was instituted for the purposes of common defence; and those who hold the reins of government have an equitable natural right to an honourable support from the same principle "that the labourer is worthy of his hire" but then the same community which they serve, ought to be assessors of their pay:
Governors have NO RIGHT to SEEK WHAT THEY PLEASE; by this, instead of being content with the station assigned them, that of honourable servants of the society, they would soon become Absolute masters, Despots, and Tyrants. Hence as a private man has a right to say, what wages he will give in his privateaffairs, so has a Communityto determine what they will give and grant of their Substance, for theAdministration of publick affairs. And in both cases more are ready generallyto offer their Service at the "proposed and stipulated price", than are "able and willing" to perform their duty.--



Under a free government, corporations cannot exist because they cannot exist without the state granting them the privilege of "cartel"; And in a free government exclusive privileges granted by government are prohibited;

Virginia Declaration of Rights:  IV That no "man", or"set of men", are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privilegesfrom the community, but in consideration of public services; which, not beingdescendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator, or judgebe hereditary.

This would not exclude contracts, but would remove the government from granting privileges of one or more people over another, which would provide true free trade, and not exclusive privileged trade;



Cain, as with Romney and others are "well versed" in Corporations, and will have the mindset of promoting corporations, which are in fact state born exclusive privileged trade, as free trade, which they are "NOT".

See the effects of "state born exclusive privileged trade" at 2009 Privileges & Contracts;



What needs to be asked, is NOT if one can run a successful "business";

But if one can "obey the limitations" set down in a free LIMITED republic as it was "originally intended" so that our freedoms are maintained;

....and can they maintain a LIMITED "SERVITUDE"; within those limitations. so that the people are not impoverished, enslaved orhave their properties placed in jeopardy;


John Locke - 201:

"It is a mistake to think this fault is proper only to monarchies. Other forms of government are liable to it as well as that; for WHEREVER the power that is put in any hands for the government of the people and the preservation of their properties is applied to
"OTHER ends", and made use of to IMPOVERISH, HARASS, or SUBDUE them to the ARBITRARY and IRREGULAR commands of those that have it, THERE it presently becomes TYRANNY, whether those that thus use it are one or many. Thus we read of the thirty tyrants at Athens, as well as one at Syracuse; and the intolerable dominion of the Decemviri at Rome was nothing better."


Cain's 9-9-9 tax (another BUY, SELL and TRADE tax system) shows conclusively that he wants to maintain the wasteful government as it is; at the expense of the people and their freedoms.

The 9-9-9 plan Cain promotes as with other flat percentage tax systems (such as the FairTax and Flat Tax) establish taxes in which the government "SEEKS WHAT THEY PLEASE".

There is no sign that he wishes to reduce the already exceeded powers taken by the federal government;

But to EXPAND THOSE POWERS; and by this he is VERY dangerous;

As are all those candidates
wishing to maintain the Status Quo;.

The only candidate showing the will to LIMIT the federal government to it's
Original Delegated powers is Ron Paul.

Ron Paul's Plan?

The 0-0-0 Planthat will limit federal taxes to tarriffs; Remove the income tax, prohibit federal sales tax, etc. and remove the IRS.

Richard Taylor
Chair
American Patriot Party.CC
American Patriot Party of Oregon













































































































































































































































































































 



American Patriot Third Party

 

John Locke - 201:

"It is a mistake to think this faultis proper only to monarchies. Other forms of government are liable to it as wellas that; for WHEREVER the power that is put in any hands for the government of the people and the preservation of their properties is applied to "other ends", and made use of to IMPOVERISH, HARASS, or SUBDUEthem to the ARBITRARY and IRREGULAR commands of those that have it, THERE it presently becomes TYRANNY, whether those that thus use it are one or many. Thus we read of the thirty tyrants at Athens, as well as one at Syracuse; and the intolerable dominion of the Decemviri at Rome was nothing better."

LOCKE CHART 330.jpg

See APP international definition of LEFT and RIGHT

 

NOLAN CHART FALACY

Nolan Chart Fallacy

See also "Fascism isLeft" Note at left column this page.

 

AMENDMENTS ARE NOT FOR ARROGATING POWER

For those who think the federal government through it's constitutional legislative process or even states "Ratifying and Amendment process" has the power of a democracy to do as it pleases outside the republic that limits them, these words from the AUTHORS OF both the Declaration of Independence and Constitution PROVE THE OPPOSITE;

The federal government is limited to the delegated powers and
NO power can be assumed or arrogated beyond those  ORIGINALLY DELEGATED to them by ANY means;

Nor can the state'slegislatures act on the federal legislative's behalf through mandates,ratification, amendment or other means to accomplish the same end; As that would allow the federal government, or any one or number of states, to dictate unlimited decrees or to enslave the rest:


Thomas Jefferson
Kentucky Resolutions
- 1798


2. " Resolved, That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish:
a.) treason,
b.)  counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States,
c.)  piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and
d.)  offenses against the law of nations,

and >>>>NO OTHER CRIMES >>>"WHATSOEVER";

and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,"

therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the — day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States," (>>>> and ALL their OTHER ACTS which assume to CREATE, DEFINE, or PUNISH crimes, OTHER than THOSE so enumeratedin the Constitution,)

>>>are "ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE";

and that the power to create, define, and punishsuch other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective "STATES", each within its own territory.

 

James Madison
Virginia Resolutions -1798

"...That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the "compact", to which the states are parties; as limited by the "plain sense and intention" of the instrument constituting the "compact"; as NO further valid that they are authorized by the grants "enumerated" in that "compact"; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of OTHER powers, NOT granted by the said "compact", the STATES who are parties thereto, have the RIGHT, and are in DUTY BOUND, to "interpose" for ARRESTING the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them."

10 years earlier in the Virginia Ratifying Convention his message was the same:

 James Madison 6-16-1788: "...If that "latitude" of construction which he contends for were to take place with respect to the "sweeping clause" (Article VI), there "would" be room for those horrors.

But it gives "NO" "supplementary" power. It ONLY enables them to execute the "delegated powers".

"If" the
"delegation" of their powers be "safe", no possible inconvenience can arise from this clause.

It is atmost "but" explanatory.

For when any power is given, its delegation necessarily involves authority to make laws to execute it


Edmund Pendleton 6-16-1788: "With respect to the necessity of the ten miles square being superseded by the subsequent clause, which gives them power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof (Article VI), I understand that clause as NOT going a "single step beyond" the "DELEGATED powers". What can it act upon? Somepower given by THIS Constitution. If they should be about topass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursuesome of the "DELEGATED powers", but can by "NO MEANS" depart from them,

(N)OR "ARROGATE" "ANY NEW" powers; for the PLAIN LANGUAGE of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give "effect" to the "DELEGATED" powers".

It is clearthe federal government has long since exceeded its authority grantedto it by the states through the compact between them, the Constitution.

The states themselves have stepped from their authorityto allow undelegated and unauthorized federal mandates to enter our states and subjugate the people and their properties under them.

This, when it is clear that it is the
State's Duty  to do the opposite; and that it is to "interpose for arresting theevil"; as Thomas Jefferson clearly presents.

John Locke establishes the below facts of resolve clearly when a government oversteps the bounds of limited authority and trust granted it:

John Locke 155:  "...I say, using force uponthe people, "without authority", and "contrary" to the TRUST (i.e. Trust established in the LIMITS set out in the ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONAL COMPACT that establish the extent of the Grant of AUTHORITY) put in him that does so, >>>is a State of WAR with the people   ..."

 "....In "ALL" states and conditions the TRUE REMEDY of "FORCE WITHOUT AUTHORITY" is to oppose force "TO" it.

The use of "FORCE WITHOUT AUTHORITY"
(without right) ALWAYSputs him that uses it into a STATE of WAR as the "Aggressor", and renders him liable to be "TREATEDACCORDINGLY"."

See Locke 16 to 20


----------------
----------------


Absolute Rights of the Colonists 1772:

1.) The first
fundamental natural law  which is to govern even the legislative power itself, is the preservation of the Society."

2.) "The Legislative has no right to absolute arbitrary power overthe lives and fortunes of the people"

3.)
"The supreme power (legislative)
"cannot" "Justly" take from any man, "any part" of his property without his "consent", in person >>>"or" by his Representative.--"

4.) "There shall be one rule of Justice for richand poor; for the favorite in Court, and the Countryman at the Plough."7

5.) Justice andRights being established from "promulgated, standing and known laws"

"These are some of the "GREAT BARRIERS" of "ALL"  FREE STATES."




American Patriot Party Platform

Unlike the major parties whose platforms are both based on national interests of a central party agenda, the American Patriot Party not only defers agendas not in conflict with the party goals defending certain inalienable rights, to the states, but the American Patriot Party and Oregon Patriot Party, beyond state issues, defers and works to strengthen both county and local community strengths against imposing state powers as well as federal.

Our aim is in educating the true definitions of freedom and reestablishing those definitions in all aspects of American law.

Many people have never read the founding documents or the letters of this country and often recite statements that have nothing to do with freedom.

It is critical to understand the foundations of freedom, otherwise we undermine its purpose, reason and intent.


What you should do before joining the American Patriot Party Independent States Parties or Oregon Patriot Party


1.) Read the Declaration of Independence. This is the founding document of this country andthe true definition of Freedom.

   a.) The Declaration of Independence defines your FirstRight and Duty as a Patriot of Freedom.

   b.) The Declaration of Independence lists 40 Grievancethat define 40 definitions of a Tyrannical government.

   c.) There are
approximately 46 Certain Inalienable Rights listed in the Declaration of Independence. Of these, 40 are the result of the 40 Grievances, the Inalienable Rights being the opposing position of those listed tyrannies.

d.) The Declaration of Independence draws from hundreds of years of slow and agonizing history to establish the definition of freedom. From the Magna Carta 1200 AD to the Rights of the Colonists 1772, These are 1 page documents - copythem and save them to your desktop; See the full history. To the Originating Founders, isthe intent of freedom defined:

e.) Valuable Research Resources:

University of Chicago, Founders Constitution http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/

Constitution.Org http://www.constitution.org

See our Site Map for Suggested Reading.


2.) Know the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

   a.)These two documents are entirely different in their function.

   b.) The Declaration of Independence defines Certain Inalienable Rights that do not change. The intent of these Certain Inalienable Rights are backed and founded by the letters of the Founding Fathers ofFreedom; All patriots who died giving you and establishing your freedomsdied for this document alone. George Washington read this documentto his men before battle so that there was no question as to what they weresacrificing for.

  c.) The Constitution limits the Federal Government. That's it. It is a document that was written many years after the Declaration of Independence, after the Articles of Confederation of which this country operated on during the revolution; The Constitution itself and the Federalists were opposed by many of the Originating Founding Fathers of freedom for good reason;

   d.) No one died to ratify the Constitution. Though at the time was deemed a necessity by some, this document has been incorrectly interpreted and these incorrect interpretations usurped many of the purposes freedom was fought for; Such as Independent States Rights, among others at the time;

Later corrupted in areas such as where the 17th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence was usurped by the 16th Amendment of the Constitution
first deemed Unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, then claimed "so called constitutional" by our so called "representatives" after amending the Constitution;

Certain, Inalienable, Rights,
cannot be changed at will by representatives or any man, no matter how many vote upon it.That is why they are called "Certain" and "Inalienable".

The
Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 See Pendleton and Nicholas establishes this limitation on the federal government by clearly stating that the federal government "CANNOT ARROGATE ANY NEW POWER"; That any changes in the constitution are limited to the DELEGATED powers and "CANNOT TAKE ONE STEP BEYOND THEM"

The Welfare Clause is limited to collecting taxes for ONLY TWO (2) purposes;

Paying the Debts and National Defense.

Nothing More. No Social Programs, No Welfare Checks, No National Health Care, Nothing Else.

The 16th Amendment remains unconstitutional as the constitution's purpose is to protect inalienable rights as presented in the 17th Grievanceof the Declaration of Independence - No taxation without our "CONSENT".

The word "Consent" is descriptive of freedom. It is used often in the documents. With out the ability to consent, you have no freedom.

It is further unconstitutional because the Ratifying and Amendment "Process" was meant to make changes
ONLY "WITHIN" the DELEGATED powers;

The Ratifying and Amendment "Process" was NEVER MEANT  to be used as a means to ARROGATE new powers upon the federal government; In FACT the federal government is EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED from ARROGATING ANY new powers byANY MEANS;

This prohibits the states from bestowing such undelegated powers upon the federal government:

" PendletonVirginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:
 
I understand that clause as NOT going a "single step beyond" the "DELEGATED powers". What can it act upon? Some power given by this Constitution.  If they should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the "DELEGATED powers", but  can by "NO MEANS" depart from them,

(N)OR "ARROGATE" "ANY NEW" powers; for the >>>PLAIN  LANGUAGE of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give  "effect" to the >>>>>>>"DELEGATED" powers"."

   e.) The Constitution's (or "Central National Government") weakness is that, as was warned by the Founding Fathers, it is able to be changed, altered and corrupted, if  the delegated limits to their powers are simply disobeyed by our own state legislatures and federal representatives.

And thishas been the case.

   f.) No oath to the Constitution supersedes the Oaths first given and established in the Declaration of Independence; and no oath is held to any man that which original intent the oath was given has been corrupted; Military or Civilian.

--------------------

Declaration of Independence: "And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on theprotection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives,our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

Constitution: Article VI: All Debts contracted "and "Engagements" entered into(Oaths and Declarations), before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid
against the United States under this Constitution as under the "Confederation". This Constitution, andthe Laws of the United States which shall be "made" in >>>"pursuance thereof"   ; and all Treaties (Oaths and Declarations) "made", or which shall be "made", under the Authority of the United States, shall be supreme Law of the Land ...."

***
Note thatthese "Supreme Laws" "Made" can only be made within the "VERY LIMITED" "DELEGATED powers.

This was clearly defined in the
Constitutional Debates. The Federal Government must stay within the "limited delegated powers" and CANNOT ARROGATE ANY NEW POWERS.

Read that Debate:

Mr. Pendleton: "... What can it act upon? Some power given by this Constitution. If they should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the delegated powers, but can by "no means" depart from them, or arrogate "any new" powers; for the plain language of the clause is,to give them power to pass laws in order to give "effect" to the"delegated powers"."

This was also Clarified again Clearly, by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison after the Constitution was ratified when they established the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions (which See)

Virginia Resolution 1798:

"That this assembly most solemnly declares a warm attachment to the Union of the "States",to maintain which it pledges all its powers; and that for this end,it is their duty to watch over and
oppose"every infraction" of those principles which constitute the "only basis" of that Union, because a "faithful observance" of them, can alone secure it's existence and the public happiness.

That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the "powers" of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as
limitedby the "plain sense and intention" of the instrument constituting the "compact";as "nofurther valid" that they are authorized by the grants "enumerated" in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous "exercise" of "other powers", "not granted" by the said "compact", the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.

"... so as to
destroy the meaning and effect, of the particular "enumeration" which "necessarily" explains and "limits" the "general phrases"; and so as to "consolidate the states by degrees", into "one sovereignty", the obvious tendency and inevitable consequence of which would be, to transform the "present republican system"(1789) of the United States, into an "absolute", or at best a "mixed >monarchy ".

APP Note: You can see how the federal government has twisted the Fifty United Free Independent State Nations into "one nation" which the Founders had no intention by the Constitution; A simple limited "compact" between Free and Independent States (State Nations); And in fact here have placed a harsh warning >never to allow it.

"That the General Assembly doth particularly protest against the palpable and alarming infractions of the Constitution, in the two late cases of the "Alien and Sedition Acts" passed at the last session of Congress; the first of which exercises a power "no where delegated" to the federal government, and which by uniting legislative and judicial powers to those of executive, subverts the general principles of free government; as well as the particular organization, and positive provisions of the federal constitution; and the other of which acts, exercises in like manner, a power not delegated by the constitution, but on the contrary, expressly and positively forbidden by one of the amendments thereto; a power, which more than any other, ought to produce universal alarm, because it is leveled against that right of freely examining public characters and measures, and of free communication among the people thereon, which has ever been justly deemed, the only effectual guardian of every other right



Kentucky Resolution 1798:

Resolved, That the several States composing, the United States of America, are
NOT united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposesdelegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their "own self-government"; and that whensoever the general government "assumes undelegated powers", its "acts" are "unauthoritative, void, and of no force": that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was NOT made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself;

since that would have made its discretion, and "not the Constitution", the "measure ofits powers";

but that, as in all other cases of compact amongpowers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress...."

#8: "...that in cases of an abuse of the delegated powers, the members of the general government, being chosen by the people, a change by the people would be the constitutional remedy; BUT, where powers are assumed which have NOT been delegated, a "NULLIFICATION" of the act is the RIGHTFUL REMEDY: that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact, (casus non fœderis) to NULLIFY of their OWN AUTHORITY ALL assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this "RIGHT", they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them: "

To ignore the intent set by  these original authors, would be to attempt dissolution of the entire Constitution.



Or as John Locke 227 presents: "The "Umpirage" is removed when the legislature acts contrary to the end they "were" constituted, destroying the authority given to them by the consent of the people."


It is clear that the Constitution was never meant to be distorted to the extent that the president, federal government or legislature would be able to act without authorization by the states or beyond the limits set and delegated by the Constitution.


George Mason:"...But I wish a clause in the Constitution, with respect to "all" powers which are not granted, that they are retained by the states.

Otherwise, the power of providing for the
"general welfare" may be perverted to its "destruction"."


This is exactly what has happened in this country;

From the federal government assuming non-delegated powerswithin the states through federal Non-delegated (in the Original Compact)
"departments"; and non-enumerated taxation in the form of the income tax;

To the states and federal governments granting "exclusive privileges" in the form and design of  allowing the creation and existenceof corporations, unionsand special interest entities;

As presented in the
Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, it is the right and duty of the "states" to arrest these evils.


Declaration of Independence:

37th Grievance:
"We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in general congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare that these united colonies are, and "of right" "ought to be", free and "independent" states;"

39th Grievance:
"and that as free and independent states they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances,establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things whichindependent states may of "right" do."

---------------

g.) Does anyone think that these patriots died for another differently named central government not unlike the one they just left and where fighting with their lives to remove?

Read the
Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions by the Authors of both the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution.

What greater Engagement is there than a oath given by the founders,representatives and people of their lives in the Declaration to uphold?!

The sole purpose and reasons for freedom are within that Declaration and the intents written in the early letters.

Clearly as written in the Constitution
Article VI, that the Constitution is bound by prior Oaths which are Engagements of the People, declared in The Declaration of Independence, and all agreements set forth in the Confederation; All those and future laws subject ultimately to those oaths which are "Engagements" of and with the People presented in the Declaration of Independence.

The Constitution would never have existed without the Declaration of Independence; and it, and all law, is bound by its intents and defined bythe letters of the originating Founding Fathers of 1776.

Freedom is "defined" in these certain inalienable rights;

And being "certain" and "inalienable", these rights cannot be givenaway, voted away by man or his representatives, surrounded by limitingrequirements (infringed) set of any man, government or institution, lostby folly to others, or sold.


Here it is defined in the letters by Samuel Adams:

-------------------

 "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave."

Samuel Adams, Rights of the Colonists, 1772

--------------------


3.) Know where the Constitution has been Corrupted so you can understand where the changes need to take place and safeguards set.

Know that the Federal Government of this country is a bureaucracy, it is not Freedom. Federalism is not freedom. Nationalism and national pride is not freedom. Borders are not freedom. Symbols are not freedom. Flagsare not freedom.

Establish your understanding of freedom through the foundation of the Declaration of Independence and the "Originating" Founders Letters.

Freedom is certain, inalienable, rights.
And these rights are defined. They are not anything you want them to be.

If certain inalienable rights are breached at all, (by vote, by reason or other) you have nothing more than simply another form of "
socialism".

There is many faces of socialism, but they are still socialism.

Examples ofwhere the original Constitution has been Breached and Certain Inalienable Rights corrupted:


   a.) Inalienable right Grievance 17 of the Declaration of Independence: No taxation without our "Consent";

Breached by the 16th amendment ofthe Constitution; Income tax was declared unconstitutional by the the supremecourt; so what did these socialists do? They took an inalienable right thatprotected us and usurped it by changing the Constitution; and calling itthen "Constitutional".

Results: Unlimited funds for the federal social bureaucracy machine.

What did the founding fathers of Freedom say about such acts of treason?

In defining Tyranny in government the Declaration of Independence presents:

17th Grievance: For imposing taxes on us without our consent;


Declaration of Independence
opening paragraphs:

That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consentof the governed; that, whenever
any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.


Samuel Adams, Rights of the Colonists, 1772:

"If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the greatend of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right tofreedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man toalienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave."

-----------------

This letter of Intent presents clearly that Inalienable Rights cannot even willingly be given away for any reason.

The 16th Amendment, income tax and taxation of any kind without each person's willing
"Consent" is and continues to be unconstitutional, and in direct conflict of our certain inalienable rights, freedom and a free country.

The forced income tax has not only funds unlimited growth inbureaucracies, it also provides unlimited funds for "exclusiveprivileges" such as corporations and unions through government contracts;and special interests through tax right offs and loop holes.

Exclusive privileges were warned against by the founders in the
Constitutional Debates and by George Mason in the Virginia Declaration of Rights #4.


   b.)Inalienable Right Grievance 36 & 37 of the Declaration of Independence: define Independent States Rights as the purpose;

37th Grievance: "We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, ingeneral congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World forthe rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name and by the authority ofthe good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare that theseunited colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states;"

39th Grievance: "and that as free and independent states they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do."

Breached by small the Portions ofthe Articles of Confederacy, Huge manipulations of the authors of the FederalistPapers and Federalists, the Constitution and Civil War.

Results:subjugation of independent states to a National Central Controlling federal socialist government.


   c.) Inalienable right of a people to secede from any government: Declared in the Declaration of Independence opening paragraphs:

"When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth the "separate and equal station" to which the lawsof nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respectto the opinions of mankind requires that they should declarethe causes which impel them to the separation."

Breached by the Federalist Papers, the Constitution and Civil War.

Results:subjugation of independent states to a National Central Controlling federal socialist government.


   d.) Inalienable right Grievance 12 of the Declaration of Independence and founder's intent: The right of the Civilians to possess greater powers than the standing army.

12th Grievance: "He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power".

Breached by numerous federal gun laws.

In addition to federal gun laws imposed by the National Firearms Act (1934), Gun Control Act (1968), Firearms Owner`s Protection Act (1986), Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (1993), the 1994 Omnibus Crime Control Act and other laws, most states and some local jurisdictions have imposed their own firearms restrictions.

Results:subjugation of independent states and free individuals inalienable rights from even their own states to a National Central Controlling federal socialist government which also use administrative rules as if they were law. .

  - subjugation offree individuals inalienable rights from Counties by Total democracy (socialist) majority passed laws

   - subjugation to Laws of Corporations - this as Citiesare corporations, and create their own gun laws against the individual.

   - subjugation and refusal of the right of a free people to use such inalienable rights to remove such government as defined in the Declaration of Independencedefined therein as your
First Right and duty:  "if any government ...... evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government..."


   e.) Inalienable right Grievance 4 of the Declaration of Independence:

4th Grievance:"He has called together legislative bodies, at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the repository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures."

Breached by State "Administrative laws" that can force people to drive long distances to "Hearings" and face appointed judges federal and state, with no juries;

This occurring, long before the trial in an area local to them, andwhere findings of the Hearing, are given weight at the trial.

The findings derived for which information was gathered together from the individual under great duress to the individual because of this distance.

Corporate and legal agreements (small print) that cause grievances of an individual also to be held in a state or location far from the placeof the occurrence.

Results:subjugation to unconcerned contractors of law which have been contracted by the state and federal governments following administrative rules asif they were law; Which fatiguing individuals into compliance with stateand federal measures, limits the ability to provide witnesses, presentingthem with unfamiliar surroundings in which to bring and find needed information.

Subjugation to corporate tactics using the same effect but greater, as such agreements can cause people to travel thousands of miles to defend themselves.


   f.) Inalienable right Grievance 10 of the Declaration of Independence:

The right to have a noninvasive non-complicated small non-intrusiveand inexpensive government.

10th Grievance"... He has erected a multitude of new officesand sent hither swarms ofofficers to harass our people and eat out their substance."

Breached by:  Huge ever expanding government caused by our "representatives" lack of understanding of true freedom and owing to union and corporate constituents who have unlimited funds to lobby.

Results:subjugation to an ever increasing government imposed bureaucracy, Loss of individuals certain, inalienable, rights; increased and ever varied taxes from bureaucracies and programs that eat out our substance.



I hope this was a clear picture as to the depth that the federal socialist government, corrupt representatives, its judges, has corrupted this free country.


4.) Know that the Constitution does not overwrite the Declaration of Independence or any of the Certain Inalienable Rights that are the Basis and
Foundation of Freedom.

   a.)Rights, which are Supreme Law in a truly free country, are Certain and Inalienable.

Rights that cannot be taken away, given away, voted away, changed, sold or altered by any individual, government or entity. They are indeed Certain Inalienable Rights.


About Membership inthe American Patriot Party States Parties and the Oregon Patriot Party

The purpose of membership allows us to register candidates in the various states and also gives the party respect and credibility to the media, general public and lawmakers.

We do not require you to revoke any current membership with other political parties.

On the contrary, we highly recommend that you keep your membership in your current political party until we have enough registered members inyour state.

So you can be a registered Republican or Democrat and an American Patriot Party Member at the same time.

Even after we have enough registered members, you may still wish toretain your current political party membership and vote the American PatriotParty Platform. This is entirely acceptable, as substance will always exceed titles in the American Patriot Party.

Your membership is very important to the party. Its fast, easy and free. All information is kept strictly confidential and will never be sold or traded.


Mission Statement

The American Patriot Party and Oregon Patriot Party are for the education and strengthening of the meanings, rights and powers originally drafted in the Declaration of Independence and by the founding fathers of this country.

That the states shall be free and independent respectfully, whereinthe
39th Grievanceof the Declaration of Independence clearly states:

"... and that as free and independent states they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do."

The Declaration of Independence we believe is the defining document which bears a free peoples First Right and Duty.

All those who fought and died for the cause of freedom fought and died for the words in this document alone.

That "first right andduty" is clearly defined where in it states if "any form of government" oversteps its bounds, this includes the Constitution,  the Federal government, or
"any form" of government, it is the peoples right and duty to "correct it" or "throw it out";

This is the first Right and Duty of a true Patriot of Freedom, Wherein it states clearly:


Declaration of Independence:

"That, to secure "these" rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that, whenever "any form" of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the "right" of "the people" to "alter" or to "abolish" it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object,
evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government and to provide new guards for their future security.

Such has been the patient suffering of these colonies, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government."

Our mission is to make America thefree America that it was intended and outlined in the Declaration of Independence.

More complete National stands on issues will be be posted on an ongoing basis.

To Join:

To Join the American Patriot Party or Oregon Patriot Party see our
JOIN Page.  To start a New American Patriot Party State Party or an American Patriot Party States County Party, Contact Richard Taylor, Chair, or Matt Thiring, Co-Chair

Welcome People for the USA!

 

US Military Armed Forces Base Directory:

Army Major Commands, Army Major Commands     AMC ­ U.S. Army Material Command located in Fort Belvior, VA.  The official web site is www.amc.army.mil  AMC is the Army's premier provider of materiel readiness to the total force across the spectrum of joint military operations.  If a soldier shoots it, drives it, flies it, wears it or eats it, AMC provides it.

MTMC ­ U.S. Army Military Traffic Management Command located onAlexandria, VA.  The official website is www.mtmc.army.mil  MTMCis the Department of Defense's heavy-equipment mover for contingency, trainingand humanitarian operations.

MEDCOM ­ U.S. Army Medical Command located at Fort Sam Houston,Texas.  The official website is www.armymedicine.army.mil  MEDCOMprojects and sustains a healthy and medically protected force; trains,equips, and deploys the medical force; and manages and promotes the healthof soldiers and military families.

USARPAC ­ U.S. Army Pacific located at Fort Shafter, Hawaii.  The official website is www.usarpac.army.mil  USARPAC provides trained and ready forces in support of military and peacetime operations in the Asia-Pacific area in order to contribute to regional stability, crisis response and decisive victory.

FORSCOM ­ U.S. Army Forces Command located at Fort McPherson, Georgia.  The official website is www.forscom.army.mil  The Army component of U.S.Joint Forces Command, FORSCOM trains, mobilizes, deploys and sustains activeand reserve component forces capable of operating in joint and combined environmentsto meet worldwide operational commitments.

USASOC ­ U.S. Army Special Operations Command located at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.  The official website is www.soc.mil  USASOC organizes, trains, educates, mans, equips, funds, administers, mobilizes, deploysand sustains Army special operations forces to successfully conduct worldwide special operations across the range of military operations, in supportof regional combatant commanders, American ambassadors and other agencies,as directed.

USARSO ­ U.S. Army, South located at Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico.  The official website is www.usarso.army.mil  USARSO commands and controls Army forces in the U.S. Southern Command area of responsibility and provides theater support for Army forces and headquarters as directed by the USSSOUTHCOM commander in chief.  USARSO will become a major subordinate command of FORSCOM and move to Fort Sam Houston, Texas, during fiscal year 2003.

TRADOC ­ U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command located at Fort Monroe, Virginia.  The official website is www.tradoc.army.mil  TRADOC shapes the 21st-century Army by training and educating its soldiers and leaders while sustaining the shared vision of how the Army operates asa member of joint service, combined arms and multinational teams.

CID ­ U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command located at Fort Belvoir, Virginia.  The official website is www.cid.army.mil  CID is the Army's criminal investigative organization and conducts investigations in which the Army is or may be a party of interest.  CID provides senior leader protective-services and forensic laboratory support to investigations; maintains the Army's criminal records; provides logistical security from factory to foxhole; conducts computer network intrusion investigations; and develops countermeasures to criminal and subversive activity.

INSCOM ­ U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command located atFort Belvoir, Virginia.  The official website is www.inscom.army.mil  INSCOM conducts dominant intelligence, security and information operations for commanders and national decision-makers, and provides warfighters with the seamless intelligence needed to understand and dominate the battlefield.

SMDC ­ U.S. Space and Missile Defense Command located in Arlington, Virginia.  The official website is www.smdc.army.mil  SDMC develops and provides space and missile-defense capabilities for the Army and the nation.

EUSA ­ Eight U.S. Army located in Yongsan, Korea.  The official website is http://8tharmy.korea.army.mil  EUSA supports deterrence of North Korean aggression against the Republic of Korea and, should deterrence fail, supports noncombatant-evacuation operations and transitions to hostilities as it generates combat power to support the United Nations Command and Combined Forces Command response.

USAREUR ­ U.S. Army, Europe located at Heidelberg, Germany. The official website is www.hqusareur.army.mil  As America's Army in Europe, USAREUR is structured and trained as a versatile and agile power-projection force, ready for joint and multinational operations, and committed to providing for the readiness and well being of its soldiers, civilians and families.

USASCE ­ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers located in Washington, D.C.  The official website is www.usace.army.mil  USACE provides quality, responsiveengineering services to the Army, Department of Defense and the nation.

MDW ­ U.S. Army Military District of Washington located at FortMcNair, Washington, D.C.  The official website is www.mdw.army.mil MDW responds to crisis, disaster or security requirements in the NationalCapital Region; provides base operations support for defense organizationsthroughout the NCR, including operation of Arlington National Cemetery;and conducts official ceremonies on behalf of the nation's civilian andmilitary leaders.  

Provided by MilitaryDial.Com - home of Discount Long Distance, Cellular Accessories, Printer Ink and Satellite TV for Military Members.

AMC, MTMC, MEDCOM, USARPAC, FORSCOM, USASOC, USARSO, TRADOC, CID, INSCOM, SMDC, EUSA, USAREUR, USASCE, MDW information page

Back to U.S. Army Index Page

 
Pacific Command (PACOM)
Current Order of Battle:

Pacific Command
  - U.S. Army Pacific  8th U.S. Army
  - 25th Infantry Division (Light)   - 6th Cavalry Brigade
  - U.S. Army Japan   - 17th Aviation Brigade
  - U.S. Army Alaska   - 164th ATS Group
  - 18th Medical Command
  - 19th Theater Support Command
  - 2nd Infantry Division (Light)

Unit

Type


Base
Barracks
Pacific Command (PACOM)
HQ   Honolulu,HI Camp Smith
      
U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)
HQ Bat   Honolulu,HI Fort Shafter
45.SuppGr   Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Schofield Bks
68.MedCo (AA)/524.SB UH-60A Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler AAF
B.Co/214.Av(M)/524.SB CH-47D Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler AAF
      
25th Infantry Division (Light) "Tropic Lightning"
HQ Co   Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Schofield Bks
DivSuppCom   Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Schofield Bks
C.Co/25.Av (AVIM) no helicopter assigned Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler AAF
AvBrig   Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Schofield Bks
1.Bat/25.Av (ATK) OH-58D(R) Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler AAF
2.Bat/25.Av (AHB)   Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler AAF
2.Bat/25.Av/A.Co (AHC) UH-60L Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler AAF
2.Bat/25.Av/B.Co (AHC) UH-60L Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler AAF
2.Bat/25.Av/C.Co (CMD) UH-60A,EH-60C,OH-58D Wahiawa/Oahu,HI WheelerAAF
2.Bat/25.Av/D.Co (AVUM)   Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler AAF
3.Sq/4.Cav OH-58D(R) Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Schofield Bks
G.Co/58.Av (ATS)   Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler AAF
      
Back to Top     
      

U.S. Army Japan (USARJ)
HQ Co   Sagamihara,Japan Camp Zama
9.TSC   Sagamihara,Japan Camp Zama
78.AvBat (CMD)   Sagamihara,Japan Camp Zama/Kastner AAF
78.AvBat/A.Co C-12F, UH-60A Sagamihara,Japan Camp Zama/Kastner AAF
78.AvBat/D.Co   Sagamihara,Japan Camp Zama/Kastner AAF
      

U.S. Army Alaska (USARAK)
HQ   Anchorage,AK Fort Richardson
ArcticSuppBrig   Anchorage,AK Fort Richardson
4.Bat/123.Av (TA)   Fairbanks,AK Fort Wainwright/Ladd AAF
4.Bat/123.Av/B.Co (MHC) CH-47D Fairbanks,AK Fort Wainwright/Ladd AAF
4.Bat/123.Av/D.Co (AHC) UH-60A Fairbanks,AK Fort Wainwright/Ladd AAF
C.Co/123.Av (AVIM) UH-60A, CH-47D Fairbanks,AK Fort Wainwright/LaddAAF
68.MedDet (AA) UH-60A Fairbanks,AK Fort Wainwright/Ladd AAF
129.MedDet (AA) UH-1V Anchorage,AK Fort Richardson/Bryant AAF
USAG Fort Greely/AvDet UH-1H Delta Junction,AK Fort Greely/Allen AAF
      
Back to Top     
      
8th U.S. Army (EUSA)
HQ   Yongsan,RoK Yongsan Main Post 1
6.CavBrig (Air)   Pyongtaek,RoK Camp Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
1.Sq/6.Cav (ATK) AH-64A Hoengsong,RoK Camp Eagle
3.Sq/6.Cav (ATK) AH-64D Pyongtaek,RoK Camp Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
       
17.AvBrig (TA)   Yongsan,RoK Yongsan Main Post 1
1.Bat/52.Av (CMD)   Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
1.Bat/52.Av/A.Co (CS) UH-60A Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
1.Bat/52.Av/B.Co (CS) UH-60A Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
1.Bat/52.Av/C.Co (CS) UH-60A Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
1.Bat/52.Av/D.Co (AVUM)   Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
2.Bat/52.Av (MHB)   Pyongtaek,RoK Camp Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
2.Bat/52.Av/A.Co (M) CH-47D Pyongtaek,RoK Camp Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
2.Bat/52.Av/B.Co (M) CH-47D Pyongtaek,RoK Camp Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
6.Bat/52.Av/A.Co (TA) C-12F Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
      
Back to Top     
      
164.ATSGr (ATS)   Yongsan,RoK Yongsan Main Post 2
B.Co/58.Av (ATS)   Uijongbu,RoK Camp Red Cloud
B.Co/58.Av/1.Pl (ATS)   Chunchon,RoK Camp Page
B.Co/58.Av/Tower (ATS)   Pyongtaek,RoK Camp Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
B.Co/58.Av/Tower (ATS)   Taegu,RoK Camp Walker
B.Co/58.Av/Radar (ATS)   Suwon,RoK Madison RadioSite
D.Co/58.Av (ATS)   Yongsan,RoK Yongsan Main Post 2
D.Co/58.Av/2.Pl (ATS)   Pyongtaek,RoK Camp Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
D.Co/58.Av/Tower (ATS)   Uijongbu,RoK Camp Stanley/Cochran AAF
D.Co/58.Av/Tower (ATS)   Tongduchon-Ni,RoK Camp Casey
D.Co/58.Av/Tower (ATS)   Uijongbu,RoK Camp LaGuardia
18.MedCom   Yongsan,RoK Yongsan South Post 1
52.MedBat (Evac)   Yongsan,RoK Yongsan South Post 1
377.MedCo (AA) UH-60A Pyongtaek,RoK Camp Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
377.MedCo/Det.1 (AA) UH-60A Taegu,RoK Camp Walker
542.MedCo (AA) UH-60A Chunchon,RoK Camp Page
542.MedCo/Det.1 (AA) UH-60A  Tongduchon-Ni,RoK Camp Casey
19.TSC   Taegu,RoK Camp Henry
C.Co/52.Av (AVIM) UH-60A  Pyongtaek,RoK Camp Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
G.Co/52.Av (AVIM) UH-60A Hoengsong,RoK Camp Eagle
      
Back to Top     
      

2nd Infantry Division (Light) "Warriors"
HQ Co   Uijongbu,RoK Camp Red Cloud
DivSuppCom   Tongduchon-Ni,RoK Camp Casey
C.Co/2.Av (AVIM) no helicopter assigned Uijongbu,RoK Camp Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.AvBrig   Uijongbu,RoK Camp Stanley/Cochran AAF
1.Bat/2.Av (ATK) AH-64D Chunchon,RoK Camp Page
2.Bat/2.Av (AHB)   Uijongbu,RoK Camp Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.Bat/2.Av/A.Co (AHC) UH-60L Uijongbu,RoK Camp Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.Bat/2.Av/B.Co (AHC) UH-60L Uijongbu,RoK Camp Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.Bat/2.Av/C.Co (CMD) UH-60A,EH-60C,OH-58D Uijongbu,RoK Camp Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.Bat/2.Av/D.Co (AVUM)   Uijongbu,RoK Camp Stanley/Cochran AAF
4.Sq/7.Cav   Munsan,RoK Camp Garry Owen
4.Sq/7.Cav/D.Trp (ACT) OH-58D Tonggo-Ri,RoK Camp Stanton
4.Sq/7.Cav/E.Trp (ACT) OH-58D Tonggo-Ri,RoK Camp Stanton
4.Sq/7.Cav/F.Trp (AVUM)   Tonggo-Ri,RoK Camp Stanton
      
Back to Top     

 

AA = Air Ambulance
AAF = Army Airfield

ACT = Air Cavalry Troop
AE = Aerial Exploitation
AHC = Assault helicopter company
ATK = Attack
ATS = Air traffic service
AvSuppBat =  Aviation support battalion
AVUM =  Aviation unit maintenance
AVIM =  Aviation intermediate maintenance
Bks =  Barracks
CAC = Command and control
CMD = Command
Evac = Evacuation
GSAB = General support aviation battalion
M = Medium helicopter
MI = Military intelligence
RC = Reserve component
SAC = Support aviation company 


United States Army Pacific Command (USARPAC).
The U. S. Army, Pacific serves as the Army Component Command to theCommander in Chief U. S. Pacific Command (USCINCPAC), less the geographicarea of Korea. USARPAC commands active U. S. Army and U. S. Army Reserveforces in Alaska, Hawaii, Japan, and in possessions and trust territoriesadministered by the United States in US Pacific command.

In October 2000, USARPAC became a Multi-Component Unit (MCU) and Army Service Component Command (ASCC) as part of the US Army transformationto meet the emerging security needs of the United States in which USARPACcontinues to be a key strategic player. The whole idea of the multi-componentunit is to give active army units additional resources to accomplish themission. The multi-component integration is important in the overall pictureof the Army's success going into the 21st century. With the Reserve andNational Guard assuming a more active role in total Army operations andthe "One Team, One Fight, One Future" concept, multi-component integrationprovides for a better understanding of each component's role in achievingvictory.

USARPAC trains Army Forces for support of military operations and peacetime engagements in order to contribute to decisive victory and promote regional stability. USARPAC solicits, awards, and administers contracts in support of mission-related requirements, including administrative supplies and services, waste disposal, food services, minor construction, facilities, maintenance and repair, grounds maintenance, ADP equipment and services, and laundry services.

Following World War II, numerous Army headquarters in the central Pacific were consolidated with the goal of forming a single Army command based in Hawaii. In 1957, the U.S. Army, Pacific (USARPAC) was established at Fort Shafter, following inactivation of the Far East Command. As Army component of the unified command led by the U.S. Commander in Chief Pacific, USARPAC was assigned a threefold mission: Provide necessary ground Army combat forces; Support those forces administratively and logistically; and Provide reserves and contingency plans to meet any ground threat to United States interests in the Pacific.

On March 23, 1979, The Department of the Army announced the establishment of the U.S. Army Western Command (WESTCOM). Then, a decade later, U.S. Army forces in the Pacific were further consolidated. Army units in Alaska and in Japan were placed under the command of the Fort Shafter headquarters, which was once again designated U.S. Army, Pacific. The new command was formally reestablished on August 30, 1990.

In the years since the end of the Vietnam War, Army forces in the Pacific have participated in major peacekeeping operations in the Sinai Desert, and have provided humanitarian and disaster relief missions in Bangladesh, the Philippines, Guam, and the island of Kauai.

Although fully trained for warfare, USARPAC soldiers are also skilled in conducting operations other than war. Whether it is assuring order among refugees at Guantanamo, providing flood relief in the deltas of South Asia, or maintaining a cease fire in the Middle East, USARPAC personnel operate far and wide in peacekeeping and humanitarian missions. In late 1994, fully one half of the 25th Infantry Division deployed to Haiti as the United States and other governments worked to restore democracy to that unfortunate nation. Two years later, USARPAC peacekeepers went to Bosnia to help restore hope to that warshattered land. 

Joint Rear Area Coordination (JRAC)

The United States Army Pacific (USARPAC), in partnership with local, state and federal authorities, have developed a plan of preparedness for the state of Hawaii. The Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Command, has identified the USARPAC as the executive agent for joint rear area coordination (JRAC). This task is normally accomplished in a wartime theater of operation, but in this case, it is being accomplished for the state of Hawaii. Teaming withlocal and state civil organizations and federal agencies, JRAC-Hawaii (HI)has accomplished a significant amount in the short time since Sept. 11.

JRAC-HI is protecting its military installations by reducing and restricting entry points using roving patrols. Guard duties have completely changed. Guards must now understand the changing dynamics of a more dangerous world, and must learn to expect the unexpected. Military installations worldwide are now on the front lines and are the subject of surveillance and probes more than ever before. Guards must be more alert to activities both on and off the installations, and they must constantly vary security procedure patterns to eliminate predictability. They must also be linked to local law enforcement and must be the beneficiaries — and target audience — of a regular joint and interagency intelligence summary. Because of these changing conditions, JRAC-HI reinstituted more formalized guard mounts and instructions — tailored to the current operational environment.


JRAC-HI has identified mission essential or vulnerable areas (MEVAs) both on and off the installations. MEVAs are facilities and capabilities essential to accomplishing the military mission. These MEVAs have been thoroughlyassessed and security needs addressed. Tailored after general defense plan(GDP) battle books from the Cold War in Europe, MEVA folders detail everyaspect relevant to the defense of these critical sites. Local civil authorities have done the same with over 150 of their own MEVAs and both the civiland military authorities regularly conduct site surveys.

JRAC-HI has fine-tuned  procedures for providing military support to civil authorities (MSCA) in the event of a natural or man-made disaster. As the executive agent for MSCA in Hawaii, American Samoa, and neighboring islands, JRAC-HI provides a defense-coordinating officer to coordinate military support of civilian consequence management operations. Even before Sept. 11, JRAC-HI maintained a close relationship with local and state government leaders, who can leverage many standing MSCA concepts and plans as the JRAC operation comes together. JRAC-HI's participation in steering committees andplenary groups, such as the Hawaii Emergency Preparedness Executive Committee, the Hawaii Energy Council and the Joint Armed Services/State of Hawaii Civil Defense Coordinating Committee, is instrumental in sharing information and developing joint and civil-military solutions to emerging challenges.

JRAC-HI has established quick reaction forces (QRFs) drawn from both U.S. Marine Corps and Army units. These QRFs are capable of moving on short notice by air or road to any place in the state to provide additional security or to assist in any other way. While awaiting adjudication at the national level on the procedures for employing those forces in domestic situations, JRAC-HI is regularly conducting joint training with civil authorities.

JRAC-HI has worked to identify seams in its collective efforts to secure Hawaii's soil and people. This coordination is taking place with all the military services in Hawaii, state and local civil defense (CD), U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), National Guard (NG), Honolulu Police Department (HPD), fire departments, and a host of other local and federal government agencies such as the state health and transportation departments. Also included in this effort are the FBI, Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), U.S. Customs Service (USCS) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), as well as selected private firms and enterprises involved in supporting Hawaii's critical infrastructure. The Joint Interagency Planning Group, established by USARPAC within days of the attacks, has been the principal driver behind this effort.


Patriots, Oregon Patriot Party Patriots, American Patriots Party, USA


 



American Patriot Third Party

Isn't it Amazing

Isn't it amazing, that three liberals posing as republicans are actually getting any votes at all from other republicans?

... As though their obvious past big government luggagedoes not exist; and that their present proposals if elected,  do not promise to increase even more the already bloated and invasive federal government and to further empower
privileged collectives;

Their statements showing clearly a willingness for costly foreign wars and continuation of  federal & state mandates on individual business & liberties.

The irony of Patrick Henry's statement over 200 yearsago is ringing true today:

Patrick Henry 6-16-1788:

"Who has enslaved the people of Germany, France andSpain? They have been enslaved by their OWN PEOPLE; If it happens here, it will only be as it has been everywhere else."

In that same Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 it was stated that the reasonthat this occurred in those countries was because the peoples "Lack of knowledge"and ignorance that produced their own slavery.

Here we have a rare opportunity to vote for someone, Ron Paul, who actually understandsthe Constitution and the limits it has upon the federal government. Who from his past record, we can trust he will do what he says and work to reign in the wasteful spending and remove unconstitutional bureaucracies and wasteful spending.

Why would anyone vote for someone else? Willful or pure ignorance? So sad.

Read, get educated
Vote for and Support Ron Paul TODAY!



FREEDOM 101

1.) Republics, once created, cannot change and are LIMITED to the "ORIGINAL" COMPACT(S).

Samuel Adams: "When Men enter into Society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demand and insist upon the performance of "such conditions", And "previous limitations" as form an equitable "ORIGINAL" "COMPACT."

EVERY natural Right not expressly given up or from the natureof a Social "Compact" necessarily ceded "REMAINS"."

2.) Changes in the Federal Government are LIMITED to changes ONLY WITHIN the DELEGATED powers ORIGINALLY granted in the "ORIGINAL" COMPACT; They CANNOT ARROGATE ANY NEW POWERS; NOR can the states "Ratify" new powers upon them through the "Amendment" process which is LIMITED to changes "WITHIN" the limited "DELEGATED" powers .

Edmund Pendleton, VIRGINIA RATIFYING CONVENTION 6-16-1788: "With respect to the necessity of the ten miles square being superseded by the subsequent clause, which gives them power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, andall other powers VESTED by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in ANY department or officer thereof (Article VI), I understand that clause as NOT going a "SINGLE STEP BEYOND" the "DELEGATED powers". What can it act upon? Somepower given by THIS Constitution. Ifthey should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the "DELEGATED powers", but can by "NO MEANS" depart from them,

(N)OR
"ARROGATE" "ANY" "NEW" powers; for the PLAIN LANGUAGE of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give "effect" to the "DELEGATED" powers."

3.) The federal government and all departments, except for forts in undeveloped territories not developed into states (which now all lands are) are limited in AREA to the 10 milessquare of Washington DC:

 James Madison, VIRGINIA RATIFYING CONVENTION 6-16-1788: " Mr. Chairman: I did conceive, sir, that the clause under consideration was one of those parts which would speak its own praise. It is hardly necessary to say any thing concerning it. Strike it out of the system, and let me ask whether there would not be much larger scope for those dangers. I cannot comprehend that the power of legislating over a "SMALL district", which >>>CANNOT EXCEED TEN MILES SQUARE, and >>>MAY NOT BE MORE THAN "ONE MILE", will involve the dangers which he apprehends. If there be any knowledge in my mind of the nature of man, I should think it would be the last thing that would enter into the mind of any man to grant exclusive advantages, ina VERY "CIRCUMSCRIBED DISTRICT" to the prejudice of the community at large.


4.) The federal government cannot govern any police force within the states outside the Ten Miles Square of Washington DC; Actually, by James Madison's terms, only 1 mile:


GEORGE MASON:"...then observed that  he would willingly give them (The federal government) exclusive power, as far as respected the police  and good government of >>>THE "PLACE" (APP: THE "PLACE" i.e the 10 miles square of Washington DC);  but he would give them >>>"NO MORE",  because he thought it unnecessary."

Mr. GREYSTON:"...It was often in contemplation of Congress to have power of regulatingthe police of the seat of government; but they >>>"NEVER" had an idea of exclusive  legislation in all cases. The power  of regulating the police and good government of >>>"it" (APP: THE "PLACE" i.e the 10 miles square of Washington DC) will secure Congress  against insults. "What originated the IDEA" of the "exclusive legislation"  was, some insurrection in Pennsylvania, whereby Congress was insulted, on  account of which, it is supposed, they left the state. It is answered that  the CONSENT of the STATE MUST be required, or else they CANNOT have such a district, "OR" places for the erecting of forts..."

(APP Note: the Civil War was begun by the federal government exceeding this limitation of federal power in attempting to refuse a state's Constitutional Right of power of consent to allow or disallow federal forces to keep or occupy a fort within their state - FORT SUMTER)

Mr. PENDLETON.Mr. Chairman, this clause does "NOT" give Congress  power to impede the operation of "ANY PART" of the Constitution, (N)or to make >>>"ANY"  "REGULATION" that may affect the interests of the citizens of the Union>>>AT LARGE. But it gives them power over the "local" "police of THE >>>PLACE" (APP: THE "PLACE" i.e the 10 miles square of Washington DC), so as to be secured from any interruption in their proceedings. Notwithstanding the violent attack  upon it, I believe, sir, this is the >>>"fair  construction of the clause". It gives  them power ofexclusive legislation in any case within >>>THAT district. 

What is the meaning of this? What is it opposed to? Is it opposed to the general powers of the federal legislature, or to those of the state legislatures?  I understand it
as opposed to the legislative power of that state where it shall BE. What, then, is the power? It is, that Congress shall  exclusively legislate there, in order to preserve {440} serve the "police" OF THE >>>"PLACE" and their OWN personal independence, that they may not  be overawed or insulted, and of course to preserve them in opposition to any attempt by the state where it shall BE this is the >>>"fair construction"."

 

-----------------


 

PEACE IS NOEXCUSE FOR SLAVERY

The greatest danger to our freedoms is an ignorant and systematic police and military force that does not know or care of the meaning and limits of our government's powers or the extent of our rights.

This condition allows for these forces to be misguided by the
PRETENSE of AUTHORITY from those who direct them.

The result will be, to easily use these forces as a tool of force against the rights, liberty, freedoms and property of the citizens.

The ARROGATED POWERS far outside the limited original delegated powers, now used of the federal government; in which they are EXPRESSLY prohibited from arrogating outside the very limited delegated powers in the
Ratifying Conventions that define the Constitution, are presently accepted by police and military without question;

The ignoranceof police or military enforcing "ANY LAW" approved by state and federallegislatures
is a realand actual danger.

This is even though they have sworn to uphold the Constitution(s) which have already long ago defined the laws we are to be under and no other;

The blind adherence by military and police forces to obey unconstitutional laws and directives of federal and state governments; which have so clearly detached themselves from the people and Constitutional laws and limitations, has long placed the military and police existence potentially at odds with the people they are suppose to serve, as they have with their own oath to office.

To keep from acting without authority, which is toassume the same status as criminal or enemy, those in positions ofpolice and military command need to set limits in policy and act politicallyto reverse the present situation of this steady invasion of rights anduse of power through the
Pretense of Authority.

If something is known to be a unconstitutional law they are called out to enforce, they need to learn to say NO.

Even if it means that peace will be ignored.

This is founded in Civil Law and clearly presented by John Locke onCivil Government.

Here John Locke was Clear as to when "the Legislative" of any government or anyone who revolts against its own country's laws put there by the consent and grant of authority given by the people who created the legislative and the laws:



Locke #226. "Thirdly: I answer, that this power in the people of providing for their safety anew by a new legislative "when their legislators have acted contrary to their trust" by invading their property, is the best fence against rebellion, and the probable means to hinder it.


For rebellion being an opposition, not to persons, "but
AUTHORITY", which is "founded ONLY in the CONSTITUTIONS and "laws of the government" (APP: which must follow the limitations of the CONSTITUTION)": those, "whoever they be", who, by force, break through, and, by force, "justify their violation of them", are "truly and properly rebels".

For when men, by entering into society and civil government, have excluded force, and introduced laws for the preservation of property, peace, and unity amongst themselves, those who set up force again in opposition to the laws, "do rebellare" -- that is, "bring back again the state of war", and are "properly rebels",

>>>which "they who arein power", "by the >>>"PRETENSE THEY HAVE TO AUTHORITY", the temptation of force they have in their hands, and the "flattery of those about them" being likeliest to do,

>>>the proper way to prevent the evil is to "show them the danger" and "injustice of it" who are under the "greatest temptation to run into it".

APP Note: Thomas Jefferson did this quite well in the KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS (which see) when he warned thefederal government of further bloodshed if they attempted to grant themselvespowers to prosecute crimes that they were "not delegated" to prosecute.


Locke #227.In both the forementioned cases, when either the legislative is changed, OR the legislators act contrary to the end for which they were constituted, "those who are" guilty are guilty of rebellion. For if any one by force takes away the established legislative of any society, and the laws by them made, pursuant to their trust, he thereby takes away the umpirage which every one had consented to for a peaceable decision of all their controversies, and a bar to the state of war amongst them. They who removeor CHANGE the legislative take away this decisive power, which nobody canhave but by the appointment and consent of the people, and so destroying theauthority which the people did, and nobody else can, set up, and introducing a power which "the people" hath "NOT authorised", actually introduce a state of war, which is that of "FORCE WITHOUT AUTHORITY"; and thus by removing the legislative established by the society, in whose decisions the people acquiesced and united as to that of their own will, they untie the knot, and expose the people anew to the state of war.

>>>>>>>And if those, who by force take away the legislative, are rebels, the LEGISLATORS THEMSELVES, as has been shown, can be NO LESS esteemed so, when they who were set up for the protection and preservation of the people, their liberties and properties shall by force invade and "endeavour to take them away"; and so they (the LEGISLATORS) putting "THEMSELVES" into a "state of war" with those (the people) who made them the protectors and guardians of their peace, are (the LEGISLATORS) properly, and with the >>>>>>>GREATEST AGGRAVATION, rebellantes, rebels.

Locke #228. But if they who say it lays a foundation for rebellion mean that it mayoccasion civil wars or intestine broils to tell the people they are absolvedfrom obedience when illegal attempts are made upon their liberties or properties, and may oppose the "unlawful violence" of those who were their magistrates when they invade their properties, contrary to the trust put in them, and that, therefore, this doctrine is not to be allowed, being 'so destructive to the "peace" of the world';

>>> they may as well say
, upon the same ground, that honest men may not oppose robbers or pirates

, because this may occasion disorder or bloodshed. If any mischief come in such cases,
>>> it is not to be charged upon him who defends his own right, but "on him" that "invades his neighbour's".

If the innocenthonest man must quietly quit all he has for peace sake to him who will lay violent hands upon it, I desire it may be considered what kind of a peace there will be in the world which consists only in violence and rapine,

and which is to be maintained only for the benefit of robbers and oppressors.

Who would not think it an admirable peace betwixt the mighty and the mean, when the lamb, without resistance, yielded his throat to be torn bythe imperious wolf?

Polyphemus's den gives us a perfect pattern of such a peace.

Such a governmentwherein Ulysses and his companions had nothing to do but quietly to sufferthemselves to be devoured. And no doubt Ulysses, who was a prudent man,preached up passive obedience, and exhorted them to a quiet submission byrepresenting to them of what concernment peace was to mankind, and by showing[what] inconveniencies might happen if they should offer to resist Polyphemus, who had now the power over them."

Locke #229. The end of government is the good of mankind; and which is best for mankind, that the people should be always exposed to the boundless will of tyranny,
OR that the rulers should be sometimes "liable to be opposed" when they grow exorbitant in the use of their power, and employ it for the destruction, and not the preservation, of the "properties" of their people?

Locke #230. Nor let any one say that mischief can arise from hence as often as it shall please a busy head or turbulent spirit to desire the alteration of the government. It is true such men may stir whenever they please, but it will be only to their own just ruin and perdition. For till the mischief be "grown general", and the ill designs of the rulers become visible, or their "attempts" sensible to the greater part, the people, who are more disposed to suffer than right themselves by resistance, are not apt to stir. (Note: Review the Declaration of Independence for these exact words and or meaning) The examples of particular injustice or oppression of here and there an unfortunate man moves them not. But if they universally have a persuasion grounded upon manifest evidence that "designs" are carrying on against their liberties, and the generalcourse and tendency of things cannot but give them strong suspicions of theevil intention of their governors, who is to be blamed for it? Whocan help it if they, who might avoid it, bring themselves into this suspicion? Are the people to be blamed if they have the sense of rational creatures, and can think of things no otherwise than as they find and feel them? And is it not rather their fault who put things in such a posture that they would not have them thought as they are? I grant that the pride, ambition, and turbulency of private men have sometimes caused great disorders in commonwealths, and factions have been fatal to states and kingdoms. But whether the mischief hath oftener begun in the people's wantonness, and a desire to cast off the lawful authority of their rulers,or in the rulers' insolence and endeavours to get and exercise an arbitrary power over their people, whether oppression or disobedience gave the first rise to the disorder, I leave it to impartial history to determine. This I am sure, whoever, either ruler or subject, by force goes about to invade the rights of either prince or people, and lays the foundation for overturning the "constitution" and "FRAME" of any just government, he is guilty of the greatest crime I think a man is capable of, being to answer for all those mischiefs of blood, rapine, and desolation, which the breaking to pieces of governments bring on a country; and he who does it is justly to be esteemed the common enemy and pest of mankind, and is to be "treated accordingly"."


One has only toread the Ratifying Conventions to know without doubt that both federal and state governments have far exceeded their limited powers; and have, in areas too numerous to count, invaded the rights, liberties and properties of the people they are supposed to serve;

Their propensity of granting Exclusive Privileges has corrupted thevery foundations of our governments.

The corruption has grown so obvious and "general" that it is necessary that the police and military deny the legislative, executive and judicial any consideration of any use of their force outside the limited delegated powers of the original compacts; and to yield and side with the citizenry respective of those limitations.

Become educated in the REAL ORIGINAL LAWS of our states and country; Make your choices now as to side; as neither ignorance or voluntary adherence to law without true authority granted by those original compacts will be given any consideration when the time comes to remove all arbitrary burdens.

Wish PEACE?

Show it by educating yourself and others and by making serious changes in your government, laws, practice and policies to RETURN and abide by the original intentof our constitutions;

Remove and or refuse to enforce laws that are clearly unconstitutional;

SHUN State Born Exclusive Privileges such as corporations, Unions, tax supported special interests, federal mandates, undelegated federal and state bureaucracies;

Remove ZONING laws that create "exclusive privileges between citizens" and any other restrictions or regulations on free enterprise and use of property.

-------------------

 


Without the Constitution and Common Law, the practice of Capitolismwill lead to corruption of Conservatism which will be gutted of it's meaning..

























































 



American Patriot Third Party

SPECIAL REPORTS #1
 

Washigton Patomack220.jpg

Danger! This can Happen to you!...

Britians Loose Their Guns:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkS2BRoCd2I&fea ture=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL312F0F67257 F7132



6 Years Later the British have to BEG to try to reverse the laws!:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKdBxpKqUvs&fe ature=related



 

--------------------------

 

"Some Cautious" (see Caution Below) GOOD NEWS IN BRITAIN:  UK SCRAPS NATIONAL ID and DESTROYS RECORDS KEPT ON CITIZENS.

Not often is there a glimpse of hope for change in such socialist government policies;

But here is a good lesson in the expensive cost and invasiveness ofthe National ID card that Britain has tried and then
thrown out.

And NOTICE that when people in government put their minds on the correct limitations to government and act, that complete bureaucracies can be "shut down";

Though the british people are still under the thumb of their government in far too many other areas that invade their rights, (See bottom video on citizen's guns being destroyed) this "particular instance" was a pleasant surprise:

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/201101091 12359/http://ips.gov.uk/cps/rde/xchg/ips_live/hs.xsl/1 972.htm

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/201101091 12359/http://ips.gov.uk/cps/rde/xchg/ips_live/hs.xsl/5 3.htm

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/201101091 12359/http://ips.gov.uk/cps/rde/xchg/ips_live/hs.xsl/1 691.htm


A "CAUTION"to this news is that other less obvious "departments" canbe used to house the "same or similar" personal information under a different"Title".

Finances my have made them reverse, but a "socialist mindset" and arbitrary power can re-implement or work toward greater invasions upon personal liberties later... Keep one eye open when you sleep.

--------


DANGER ONHORIZON!

EUROPEAN UNION NEWS

Socialists Start Takeover of EU

Raising political group Threshold status before rival political parties will be recognized;


 

Watch these videos closely and more than once, so that you can understand what is taking place!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svnf25FUrqw

 




















Watch as the "socialist party"
(the smug and arrogant little instigator in the Red Tie and his counter part)  has seduced the councils to ignore and defy European Union rules and procedure to pass for the "second time" a raise in the number of support states that will be necessary before a political party will even be recognized there.

Listen as he attempts to quell their fears by stating that it would not endanger "those parties" "already" "in the Union"...
and what about those who are not yet recognized but wish to be!

"Or" if those parties already in the union are caused to fraction to their destruction, that is, loosing the required number of states in which to be recognized, then loosing representation of all those states!

This "threshold limit" purpose is only there to limit the competition and descent thatmay rise up against the will of the larger parties. This is made clear bythose opposing the measure.

There is no other purpose but to destroy the voice and independence of the smaller republics;

What they should have asked this "little socialist" and his little Comrade, is why he saw raising the threshold for a SECOND TIME or even a first time
NECESSARY!

There being NO NECESSITY!

They need to find out who is filling his pockets and make ready the TAR and FEATHERS; Stocks and prison.

This steady corruptionis a sure thing to start a war;

This is as the other European nations are already granting themselves advantages in trade over Britain and others.

If you do not think so,
look at the next video below "after" reviewing this one thoroughly!


SIMILARITY IN THE UNITED STATES


This removal of political competition exists in our country as well with the very same dangers:

Our country does this much of the same by causing a new party to gather thousands of votes before being "recognized" by astate as "a party"; And as the population and voters increase, so does the threshold to be recognized!

The Corruptionis the same! 

This is why all limitations to parties to be recognized should be removed as well as removal of any government funding for candidates.

 It should not evenbe necessary to be recognized by anyone;

Nor should thestate be involved with limiting or granting anything based on parties atall.

Simply proclaiming to be aparty should be enough;

Then let the people decide at the voting booth on what party they will wish to support.

The result of party recognition policies is the establishment of:

"EXCLUSIVEPRIVILEGES"

The corruption shown by limiting recognition to only certain parties, is a "Exclusive Privilege" of "Advantage" granted by the state to existing parties; and no where granted in the Constitution(s) as a power. 

It is against the freedom of expression, it is also a branch of corruption through the existence of unconstitutional income tax.

It is no excuse to Create a Bar that well financed can can reach, then state, "Well, if you are good enough to reach the bar, then you too can can have your party printed on the voters ballot. "  as if a list of party names would use too much ink or paper.

This limits the competition to only the larger and better financed parties who are supported by other "exclusive privileged" organizations and collectives such as Corporations, Unions and Special interests such as Banks, and national/international organizations.

Exclusive Privileges were warned by the founders never to exist in a free country.

See Virginia Declaration ofRights #4:

IV ::That no man, or set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public services; which, not being descendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator, or judge be hereditary.


VirginiaRatifying Convention 6-16-1788:

 James Madison: "If there be any knowledge in my mind of the nature of man, I should think it would be the last thing that would enterinto the mind of any man to grant exclusive advantages, in a very circumscribed district, to the prejudice of the community at large."

Warning by Greyston in the same convention indicating the granting of exclusive privileges is an abuse of power:

 Mr. Greyston: "They may grant "exclusive privileges" to any particular part of which they have the possession. But it may be observed that those extensive countries will be formed into independent states, and that their CONSENT will be NECESSARY. To this I answer, that they may still grant such "privileges" as, in that country, are already granted to Congress by the states. The grants of Virginia, South Carolina, and other states, will be subservient to Congress in this respect. Of course, it results from the whole, that requiring the consent of the states will be "NO GUARD" against this "ABUSE of POWER".

"
...Adverting to the clause investing Congress with the power of exclusive legislation in a district not exceeding ten miles square, he said he had before expressed his doubts that this {431} district would be the favorite of the generality, and that it wouldbe possible for them to give "exclusive privileges" of commerce to those residing within it. He had illustrated what he said by "European examples". It might be said to be impracticable to exercise this power in this manner. Among the various laws and customs which pervaded Europe, there were exclusive privileges and immunities enjoyed in many places.

He thought that
this ought to be guarded AGAINST; for should such "exclusive privileges be granted to merchants" residing within the ten miles square, it would be HIGHLY injurious to the inhabitants of OTHER PLACES."


This is a lesson told over and over in history;


Adequate Representation Needs Small Independent Republics


See our 2008 and following 2009 news letter  as to what happens when small republics begin to be consumed and joined into large single nations;  note the warning of Brutus;

Brutus: "…History furnishes no example of a free republic, any thing like the extent of the United States.

The Grecian republics were of small extent; so also was that of theRomans.

Both of these, it is true,
in process of time, extended their conquests over "large territories of country";


and the >>> "CONSEQUENCE" was,
that their governments were "CHANGED"

(see John Locke on Civil Government regarding legislatives remove themselves from power when they "change")

"from" thatof free governments

>>> to those of the most tyrannical that ever existedin the world…"

Also review the warnings of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, that if ever we combine the states into "one nation" we will become a "mixed monarchy". 

NOT arepublic, nor republic "s".

Relate this statement by GeorgeMason in the Constitutional Debates to what is clearly happening inthese videos of the European Union:

Mr. GEORGE MASON: "thought that there were fewclauses in the Constitution so dangerous as that which gave Congress "exclusivepower of legislation" within "ten miles square".

Implication, he observed, was capable of "any extension", and would probably be extended toaugment the congressional powers."

 "But here there was no need of implication. This clause gave them an unlimited authority, in every possible case, within that district. This ten miles square, says Mr. Mason, "may set at defiance the laws of the surrounding states", (which has already occurred inthe US and in the EU) and may, like the custom of the superstitious days of our ancestors, become the sanctuary of the blackest crimes. Here the federal courts are to sit. We have heard a good deal said of justice."


The protections defined by the Founders to this danger, was that of the limitation of our federal government to "delegated powers";

Which our federal government has begun stepping beyond to allow the corruption we see taking place in "our" country and states from our design of "union"; It has taken 200 years for the peak of corruption to begin in our country because of our state constitutions and jealous protections of them have restrained  the progress;

Early Corruption in Europe's Union

But look how quickly the corruption has taken hold of the European Union in just a few years;

Those who have bided their time, have found the
vehicle in the European Union to disarm the nations andstrip what very few freedoms the people there do have (see lower video ofremoving their rights to even the simplest weapons).

Where the only hope they have to retain their sovereignties from being taken over completely by the banking and corporate elite,...

 Would be
to
immediately cast down the Union altogether, or be chained hand and foot to it until their destruction.

And to deny those, if they are not the same in heritage, who would find victory in enslaving their past enemies through the means of finance, debt and dependency; To enslave countries who had in earlier times had defeated them in a justly fought and won, open war.


A Founder's Warning

George Mason gave another warningrelating to "this type" of take over; and further about giving too much power to a "central group" such as our US congress, which is suppose to be highly limited to the 10 miles square of Washington DC except for forts inthe unclaimed territory until the land was constructed into states who would then take full control and management.

George Mason: "The objection was, that too much power was given toCongress power that would finally destroy the "state governments" "more effectually" by >>>insidious, "underhanded means", >>>than such as could be openly practiced.

This, said he, is the opinion of many worthy men, not only in this Convention, but in all parts of America."


Now let us view the Second video of the forces within the European Union granting Exclusive Privileges in trade to some states and not others, listen to the complaint of the British spokesman, Mr. Nigel Farage of the United Kingdom Indepenent Party (UKIP):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTfv6uOHgqQ

We are looking for complete or Farage's Audio and/or transcript for this video which dad been removed from the video.
Please send to this email.

While we work to find an post this, you may wish to look for it as well and other videos at the Multimedia Library of the EP:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/en/multimedia-library

 




















Creeping EU Totalitarianism:

"Brown Shirt"
Tactics on the rise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVeMBNB0cII&NR=1

 



















European Sovereignty Called For:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiFFAcfkeOQ&eurl=htt p://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=12817

 




















END OF EU PREDICTED BY BRITAIN

As Socialists attempt a
EU BANK TREASURY to control currancy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjVH3JcTVRw&featur e=related


















Britains lose their gun rights by not fighting: Need a better excuse to fight for yours?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DilgkjA48Gs























John Locke: 155. "It may be demanded here, what if the executive power, being possessed of the force of the commonwealth, shall make use of that force to hinder the meeting and acting of the legislative, when the "original constitution" or the public exigencies require it? I say, using force upon "the people", "without authority", and contrary to the trust put in him that does so, >>>is a state of war with "the people", who have a right to reinstate their legislative in the exercise of their power. For having erected a legislative with an intent they should exercise the power of making laws, either at certain set times, or when there is need of it, when they are hindered by any force from what is so necessary to the society, and wherein the safety and preservation of the people consists, the people have a RIGHT to remove it BY FORCE.

In
ALL states and conditions the true remedy of force without authority

is to oppose force TO it.

The use of force "without authority"
ALWAYS puts him that uses it into a state of war as the aggressor, and renders him liable to be "treated accordingly"."


John Locke
#201: "...For exceeding the bounds of authority is no more a right in a great than a petty officer, no more justifiable in a king than a constable."


John Locke  #221: There is, therefore, secondly, another way whereby governments are dissolved,
and that is, when the legislative, or the prince, either of them "act contrary to their TRUST".

For the legislative acts against the trust reposed in them when they endeavour to invade the property of the subject
, and to make >>>themselves, >>>OR ANY PART of the COMMUNITY, masters or arbitrary disposers of the lives, liberties, or fortunes of "the people".

John Locke #222: The reason why menenter into society is the preservation of their property; and the end while they choose and authorise a legislative is that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the society, to limit the power and moderate the dominion of every part and member of the society. For since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making:

WHENEVER the >>> legislators endeavour to take away and destroythe property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselvesinto a "state of war" with "the people", who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence...."


James Madison - Virginia Resolutions:

"...
That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the "powers" of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as
LIMITED by the >>>"plain sense and intention" of the instrument constituting the "compact"; as "no further valid" that they are >>>authorized by the grants "enumerated" in "THAT" compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous "exercise" of  "OTHER powers", "NOT granted" by the said "compact",

the states who are parties thereto, have the
RIGHT, and are in DUTY BOUND, to interpose for arresting the progress of the EVIL, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them."





















































 



American Patriot Third Party

SPECIAL REPORTS #2

EXPOUNDING
on
GENERAL PHRASES

SUPREME LAW OF THE "LAND"?
DEFINE "LAND".
 

The Founders defined the term "Land" and the "Supremacy of it, often referring "ONLY" to the 10 miles square of Washington DC.


It is defined in the ratifying conventions that the federal government:

a.)  Cannot serve police outside the 10 miles square of Washington DC.

b.) Nor can they prosecute crimes other than the few crimes allowedto be prosecuted by them by the delegated powers and cannot create any new laws or crimes in which they would even have the power to prosecute. i.e. Could Not Arrogate ANY NEW POWERS

See:
Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 and the (Virginia and) Kentucky Resolutions #2

c.) Lands in undeveloped territories were not to be used to the prejudice of any existing state; But when any territory became a state, that state was to take full management of all lands within it's borders for distribution to the people who chose to settle within it.

d.) The federal government and "departments" were limited to the 10miles square, except for needful forts in undeveloped territories,only where states gave permission when developed into states.

Problems occur
as warned by the Founders, when the Constitution is taken by its single face value and not related the
Ratifying Conventions that define the meaning ofthe words written in the Constitution; And as warned, governments begin to EXPOUND on "GENERAL PHRASES" without stopping to consider the LIMITATIONS of those

>>>"GENERAL PHRASES":


------------
 

The PHRASE and
Extent of the word "LAND"

When the PHRASE in the Constitution "Supreme Law of the Land" is used, when correctly defined through the Ratifying Conventions, that "LAND" was limited in most places to the 10 miles squareof Washington DC when describing supreme powers within the states, and NOT to be interpreted as a "unlimited power" of Congress over or within all states;

That
"Supremacy" was thereby limited to a SMALL AREA in most cases (see James Madison below);

And limited to delegated powers in all others.
 

-----------------

The Declaration and Intent:
 

Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Independence 1776:

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in general congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare that these united colonies are, and of right oughtto be, free and independent states;

39.) and that as free and independent states they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do.


"And for the support of this Declaration, with a  firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

-----------------


The "Limited" Constitutional Compact:


Constitution 1788: Article VI: All Debts contracted "and "Engagements" entered into (Oaths and Declarations), before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid >>>against the United States under THIS Constitution as under the "Confederation"THIS Constitution, andthe Laws of the United States which shall be "made" in >>>"pursuance thereof"    ; and all Treaties (Oaths and  Declarations) "made", or which shall be "made", under the "Authority" of the United States, shall  be >>>"supreme Law "of the Land" ...."

----------------
 

AUTHORITY

"Authority" and "Supremacy are "limited" to the "Very Limited DELEGATED" powers; and the words "of the Land" is limited in most cases to mean ONLY within the 10 miles square of Washington DC, and ONLY elsewhere within the "DELEGATED" powers.

It is NOT a "sweeping power", but a exclusive, defined  and "very limited" power. It is a
>>>"GENERAL  PHRASE" NOT to be distorted or "EXPOUNDED" upon to grant unlimited powers:

-----------------
 

MISUSE of GENERAL PHRASES
 

This misuse of  "GENERAL PHRASES" in the Constitution was first stopped by the authorsof the Declaration of Independence and Constitution - Thomas Jefferson and James Madison when they wrote the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions in response to the John Adamsadministration passing the Alien and Sedition acts.
 

-----------------


Virginia Resolution 1798


James Madison:
" ....That the General Assembly doth also express  its deep regret, that a spirit has in sundry instances, been manifested by the "federal government", to enlarge its powers by forced constructions of the >>>constitutional charter "which >>>defines them"; and that implications have appeared of a "design" to

>>>>>>>"EXPOUND" certain "GENERAL" "PHRASES"


(which havingbeen copied from the "very limited" grant  of power,in the former articles of confederation were the less  liable tobe misconstrued) so as to destroy the meaning and effect, of the "particular" "enumeration" which >>>"necessarilyexplains and >>>limits" the "GENERAL" "PHRASES"; and so as to consolidate the states by degrees,  into one sovereignty (i.e. ONE NATION - clearly here establishing something never intended), the obvious tendency and inevitable consequence of which would be, to transform the present republican system of the United States, into an absolute,or at best a >>>mixed MONARCHY".



A wake up call from James Madison's testimony and others, 10  years prior:


Virginia Ratifying Convention
6-16-
1788
:


JAMES MADISON
. Mr. Chairman: "...I cannot comprehend that the  power of legislating over a
"small district", which >>>"CANNOT EXCEED" >>>ten miles square, and may  >>>"NOT be" more than "ONE" mile, will involve the dangers which he apprehends. 

If there be any knowledge in my mind of the nature of man, I shouldthink  it would be the last thing that would enter intothe mind of  any man to grant exclusive advantages, ina
"VERY" circumscribed district, to the prejudiceof the community at large.

 ...... Let me remark, if not already remarked, that there must be a cession,  by particular states, of the district to Congress,  and that the states may settle the terms of the cession.

The states may make what stipulationthey please in  it, and, if they apprehend

>>>"ANY" danger,

they
>>>"MAY"

>>>REFUSE it >>>ALTOGETHER."


Mr. LEE "... Gentlemen had suggested that the seat of government  would become a sanctuary for state villains, and that, in a short time, ten miles square would subjugate a country of eight hundred miles square.

(APP: Thisstatement shows that the  federalists had no idea of how power corrupts- the federal government has  subjugated not only the state butall the states today)

This appearedto him a most improbable possibility;  nay, he might call it "impossibility".  Were the place crowded with rogues, he asked if it would  be an agreeable place of residence for, the members of the general government,  who were freely chosen by the people and the state governments. Would the  people be so lost to honor and virtue, as to select men who would willingly  {436} associate with the most abandoned characters? He thought the honorable  gentleman's objections against remote possibility of abuse went to prove thatgovernment of no sort was eligible, but that a state of nature was preferable  to a state of civilization. He apprehended no danger; and thought that persons  bound to labor, and felons, could not take refuge in the ten miles square,  or other places exclusively governed by Congress, because it would be contrary tothe Constitution, and a palpable usurpation,  to protect them.

Mr. PENDLETON."...With  respect to the necessity of the ten miles square being superseded by the subsequent clause, which gives them power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers VESTED by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof, I understand that clause asNOT going a "single step beyond" the "DELEGATED powers". What can it act upon? Some power given by this Constitution.  If they should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the "DELEGATED powers", but  can by "NO MEANS" depart from them,

(N)OR "ARROGATE" "ANY NEW" powers; for the >>>PLAIN  LANGUAGE of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give  "effect" to the >>>>>>>"DELEGATED" powers"."


(APP: Note thatstate's federal representatives (house and senate) "ratifying" laws outsidethe "delegated" powers is an "ARROGATED" power. The income  tax is an "ARROGATEDpower; Printing paper money and not using gold and silver as currency is a "ARROGATED" power; Mandates on states is an "ARROGATED" power;

The "ratifying or amendment" process was for correcting and limiting existing  delegated federal powers,
NOT to be used as ameans of states or federal governments to ARROGATE NEW POWERS "outside" the original DELEGATED POWERS, which clearly the federal and state governments are PROHIBITED from doing (or allowing to be done) by "ANY" "MEANS". As Edmund Pendletonestablishes)


"Suppose it was contrary to the sense  of their constituents to grant exclusive privileges to citizens  residing "within >>>THAT place"

(APP Note: Today'scorruption does not limit this to that area and extends  far beyond- Corporations, Unions, Tax supported Special Interests, Undelegated - Under the Original Compact - state and federal bureaucracies as well as Zoning grants & restrictions are ALL examples of "exclusive privileges"  granted by the state);

the effect would be directly in opposition to what he says.
It could haveNO operation without the LIMITS of >>>"THATdistrict. Were Congress to make  a law granting them an exclusive privilege of trading  to the EastIndies, it couldhave >>>NO effect  the moment it would go without >>>>>>>"THAT" PLACE;

for their
>>>>>"exclusive power" is >>>>>"CONFINED"  to

>>>>>>>>>>>"THAT" district.

Were they topass such a law, it wouldbe NUGATORY; and "EVERY" member of the community at large could trade to the East Indies as well as the citizens of that district. This "exclusive" power is "LIMITED" to >>>>>>>"THAT" PLACE "SOLELY", for their >>>OWN preservation, which all gentlemen  allow to be necessary. "





Federal Police powers inside the United States are LIMITED to THAT area within the 10 miles  square:


GEORGE MASON:"...then observed that  he would willingly give them exclusive power,as far as respected the police  and good government of >>>THE "PLACE";  but hewould give them

>>>"NOMORE",  because he thoughtit unnecessary."

Mr. GREYSTON:"...It was often in contemplation of Congress to have power of regulatingthe police of the seat of government; but they >>>>>>>"NEVER" had an idea of exclusive  legislation in all cases. The power  of regulating the police and good government of >>>"it" (APP: THE "PLACE") will secure Congress  against insults. "What originated the IDEA" of the "exclusive legislation"  was, some insurrection in Pennsylvania, whereby Congress was insulted, on  account of which, it is supposed, they left the state. It is answered that  the CONSENT of the STATE MUST be required, or else they CANNOT have such a district,

"OR" places for the erecting of forts..."

(APP Note: the Civil War was begun by the federal government exceeding this limitation of federal power in attempting to refuse a state's Constitutional Right of power of consent to allow or disallow federal forces to keep or occupy a fort within their state - FORT SUMTER)

Mr. PENDLETON.Mr. Chairman, this clause does "NOT" give Congress  power to impede the operation of "ANY PART" of the Constitution, (N)or to make >>>"ANY"  "REGULATION" that may affect the interests of the citizens of the Union>>>AT LARGE.

 But itgives them power over the "local" "police of THE >>>PLACE",

so as to be secured from any interruption in their proceedings. Notwithstanding the violent attack  upon it,

 I believe, sir, this is the
"fair  construction ofthe clause".

It gives  them power of exclusive legislation in any case within
>>>>>>>THAT district. 

What is the meaning of this? What is it opposed to? Is it opposed to the general powers of the federal legislature, or to those of the state legislatures? 

I understand it
as opposed to the legislative power of that state where it shall BE. What, then, is the power? It is, that Congress shall  exclusively legislate there,

in order to
preserve {440} serve the "police" OF THE >>>>>>>"PLACE" and their OWN personal independence, that they may not  be overawed or insulted, and of course to preserve them in opposition to any attempt by the state where it shall be this is the

>>>>>>>"fair construction".

 

POWER TO PROSECUTECRIME
"LIMITED" to the DELEGATED POWERS ONLY


The powers of "prosecuting crimes"  are limited to "ONLY THOSE CRIMESlisted in the delegated powers granted  the federal government under the >>>ORIGINAL COMPACT - i.e.  the >>>ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION:



Thomas Jefferson in the Kentucky Resolutions makes this abundantly clear:

 
"#2. Resolved, That  the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress  a power to:

a.) punish treason,
b.) counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States,
c.) piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and
d.) offenses against the law of nations, and

>>>>>>>"NO  OTHER" CRIMES,

>>>>>>>"WHATSOEVER";"


FBI, CIA, DEA,ATF etc. are all undelegated federal powers within the states; and all "other""crimes" which the federal government now prosecute outside these limiteddelegated powers are the true responsibility of the individual state'swithin their own territory.

(illegal aliens etc. are a states responsibility)

" and it being true as a general principle,  and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared,  that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,  not prohibited by it to the States, are  reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of  July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States," (and "ALL" their OTHER acts which >>>ASSUME  to >>>create, >>>define, or >>>punish crimes, OTHER than those SO ENUMERATED  in the Constitution,)

are
>>>"ALTOGETHER" >>>"VOID", and of >>>"NO  FORCE";

and that the power to  create, define, and punish
such OTHER crimes is RESERVED, and, of right, appertains solely and  exclusively to the respective States,

>>>>>>>each within its OWN territory."




 

THE ORIGINAL INTENT:


Declaration of Independence  1776:

37th Grievance:
"We, therefore, the representatives of the United  States of America, in general congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme  Judge of the World for the rectitude of our
intentions, do,  in thename and by the authority of the good people of these colonies,  solemnly publish and declare that these united colonies are, and "of  right" "ought to be", free and "independent" states;"

39th Grievance:"and that "as" free and independent states they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of RIGHT do."



The original "General Welfare" or purpose  of the Constitution was to provide defense against obvious foreign aggression and the setting of standards between states for orderly commerce, limited within the "delegated" powers.

ALL other powers were reserved by the states and no less to the people;






 

PARTY COMPARISON


We are often asked why patriotic parties are so fractured.

To illustrate, we will compare probably the closest party to our own, the Constitution Party.

 The major difference between our party and the Constitution party, as well other "patriotic" parties, is that the Constitution party still seems to start  from the Constitution at face value without referring to the
Ratification Conventions that quite necessarily define the meaning of the GENERAL PHRASES in the Constitution and LIMITATIONS set by the Founders of and writtenin that constitution.

We have not seen much in the way of any other party presenting  the limitations established both in historical Common Law that are still in effect as
preexisting claim to rights;  or  those limitations to the Constitution defined in the Ratifying Conventions; 



George Nicholas:6-16-1788: "....But the "COMMON LAW" is "NOT EXCLUDED". There is "NOTHING" in "thatpaper" (APP Note: referring to the USConstitution being considered) to warrant the assertion. ....A bill of rights is only an acknowledgment of the preexisting claim to rights in the people.

>>>They belong to us as much as if they had been inserted in the Constitution."



It seems that though the Constitution Party promotes that they are for states rights, they tend to lean toward still enacting laws from congress outside  the delegated powers over all the states; Rather than giving it to states and counties to decide so enforcing state and county laws to NULLIFY undelegated powers both federal and state; or to leave states, counties and people to empower themselves;

The Constitution Party also still seems to promote the Federal Constitution as unlimited in power often quoting "supreme law of the land" as an absolute power, which it is not in the way they present it; Or as a means to promote goals in the states through the constitution or federal legislative not delegated to them in some areas of >>>their interest.


We are unconvinced, though the Constitution Party has many good features, that the Constitution Party (or other party) would simply remove the federal hand from the states to such the extent as was clearly intended by the Founders (though some of CP's state parties might follow others lead to do so).

Expecting the federal government to act on undelegated powers, empowers the federal government to act outside the delegated powers;

The Constitution Party, as with other parties, by expecting a "national" decision, create their own opposition!

Instead of removing undelegated federal powers and presence from the states, so that local communities can enforce their own laws without national opposition and interference!



Manipulationby State
Exclusive Privileged Groups.


Nor are we convinced that if in power that the Constitution Party or other party except our own would act to remove "exclusive privileges" that the founders insisted should never exist in the states.

Corporations;Unions; Tax supported Special Interests; Undelegated  - Under theOriginal Compact - state and federal bureaucracies; as well  asZoning grants & restrictions; are ALL examples of "exclusive privileges" granted by the state;

If you have to ask the government to do something, someone else is prohibited unless they too ask, it is an exclusive privilege;

Stating that someone else can have an exclusive privilege if they ask the state, or are fortunate enough to acquire from the state, as may be an argument, is no excuse for allowing that which should not exist.



Other Differences


APP goals also aim to remove the ill effects of distant legislatures by  reducing the size of states as set forth in our 2008  Newsletter;

Yet another of our many goals we do not believe any other  party would even consider, but is critical in strengthening and empowering local representation and local control;


Ultimate Solution


 Nullification by the states of ALL undelegated federal powers, bureaucracies and federally mandated state bureaucracies within  their state borders, as well as relinquishing their own state powers by granting all counties within their state, full statehood for adequate local representation; as well as federal acknowledgment by each state's federal representation as directed by the Constitution for new states.

We hope to have these and other comparisons when we complete our Compare  page as well as discuss the misuses of the term "Freedom of  Contract" and free trade when "exclusive privileges" are allowed to  exist.

 

Education


Directing others to learn the true intent of the founders by having them read the Ratifying  Conventions of 1788 (full day debate 6-16-1788 witha link at bottom of page into all the conventions at constitution.org) which define the meaning  and intentof both the Constitution and Federalist papers, is the first step to regaining control of this country.

Voluntary ignoranceof those who simply refuse to read these documents is our greatest enemy.

 

Fractured Patriotism


The reason many so called "patriotic" parties are so "splintered" is much from this ignorance and confusion brought about by "blind undefined nationalistic patriotism"; Instead of knowledgeable, historically correct and "factually based patriotism" which is clearly defined in the documents.

These issues need to be remedied before so called patriotic partiescan support one another.

So long as parties:

a.)  try to place the pulpit or other undelegated issues in a federal position,  where NO power to do so was ever delegated;

b.) attempt to make "onenation" out of nation of independent states; Which was never intended;

c.)
or refuse to simply empower the states and local communities were the power was
reserved and best served;

...then they will continue to allow all the combined states,and general national and international opinions to dictate over the individual states and communities and continue a power over us, which was neverdelegated to them, or to congress to do so.


NULLIFICATION
THE RIGHTFUL REMEDY


Nullification
by State or County Resolution or Local Judicial Judgment
of ALL undelegated federal andstate powers and bureaucracies not listed under the Original Compact by any and every local county or state judge, or county or state legislature, is the first step:



George Nicholas 6-16-1788:

 > ...that this
"general welfare" was united, "NOT" to "the general power of legislation", but to the >particular power > of laying and collecting taxes, imposts, and excises,

>>>FOR THE PURPOSE of paying the debts and providing for the "common defence"
,

that is, that they could raise as much money as would pay the debtsand provide for the "common defence", in "consequence of this power". The clause which was affectedly called the sweeping clause
(Article VI) contained "NO new grant of power". To illustrate this position, heobserved that, if it had been added at the end of every one of the enumerated powers, instead of being inserted at the end of all, it would be obvious to any one that it was "NO" augmentation of power.

If, for instance, at the end of the clause granting power to lay and collect taxes, it had been added that they should have power to make necessary and proper laws to lay and collect taxes, who could suspect it to be an addition of power? As it would grant
"NO" new power if inserted at the end of each clause, it could not when subjoined to the whole.

He then proceeded thus: But, says he, who is to determine the
extent of such powers?

I say, the same power which, in
>>>>>>>ALL well-regulated communities, determines the "extent" of "legislative" powers.



If they exceed these powers, the "JUDICIARY" WILL declare it "VOID",

or else "the PEOPLE" will have a "RIGHT" to declare it "VOID".




 

Kentucky Resolution1798

Thomas Jefferson:

".....
that it does also believe, that to take from the States all the powers of self-government and transfer them to a general and consolidated government, without regard to the special delegations and reservations
solemnly agreed to in that compact, is "NOT" for the peace, happiness or prosperity of these States; and that therefore this commonwealth is determined, as it doubts not its co-States are, to submit to undelegated, and consequently unlimited powers in

>>>"NO" "MAN", or "BODY of MEN"

on EARTH:


that in cases of an abuse of the delegated powers, the members of the general government, being chosen by the people, a change by the people would be the constitutional remedy;

>>>>>>>BUT, where powers are assumed which have NOT been delegated,

a >>>"NULLIFICATION" of the act is the "RIGHTFUL REMEDY"

that
every State has a natural RIGHT in cases not within the compact, (casus non fœderis) to NULLIFY of their OWN AUTHORITY "ALL" assumptions of power by others within their limits:

that without this "RIGHT", they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them:"


Local and State Judges who do not Nullify on a regular basis any and all undelegated federalpowers and bureaucracies are the first problem to be removed; andreplaced with those who will.


 



American Patriot Third Party

SPECIAL REPORTS #3

Federal Government and Socialists Demonizing
that which should be exaltedand Confusing that which was clearly written.

Speeches and Videos
 to Remind Us
.

Dwight D. Eisenhower's
Secretary of Agriculture,
 Ezra Taft Benson

Speech entitled

"Stand Up For Freedom."

PART 1

Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTd-CnCMK-8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART 2

Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUu0prLE9no

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART 3

Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raAxdZrSwhU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Below are two subjects, The firstis where the Executive organizes others in government to do his ownbidding; and Second, the practice past and present, to use such confusionas mentioned in the above videos, to demonize those things that in freedomwe should be exalting. In this subject, the MILITIAS.


See the below VIDEO of Obama creating a special branch in government of his own making, and purposes; So to exceed his authority.

 

A Warning from John Locke about the Executive verbally establishing his intentions to dictate powers not delegated to him:

See also Locke 140, 141, 168, 222


John Locke 168: The old question willbe asked in this matter of prerogative, "But who shall be judge whenthis power is made a right use of?" I answer: Between an executive powerin being, with such a prerogative, and a legislative that depends upon his will for their convening, there can be no judge on earth.

As there can be none between the legislative and the people, should either the executive or the legislative, when they have got the power in their hands, design, or go about to enslave or destroy them, the people have no other remedy in this, as in "ALL other cases" where they have no judge on earth, but to >>> appeal to Heaven; (APP Note: This Appeal to Heaven is clearly written in the Declaration of Independence) for the rulers in such attempts, exercising a power the people NEVER put into their hands, who can NEVER be supposed to consent that anybody should rule over them for their harm, do that which they have NOT a right to do.

And where the
>>>body of the people, or ANY SINGLE MAN, are deprived of their right, "or" are under the >>>"exercise of a power WITHOUT right", having no appeal on earth they have a liberty to appeal to Heaven whenever THEYjudge the cause of >>>"SUFFICIENT MOMENT"."

John Locke 222: "...He (the Executive) acts also contrary to his trust when he employs the force, treasure, and >>>offices of the society to corrupt the representatives and gain them to his purposes, when he openly pre-engages the electors, and prescribes, to their choice, such whom he has, by solicitation, threats, promises, or >>>otherwise, won to his "designs", and "employs them" to bringin such who have promised beforehand what to vote and >>>what to enact....

(APP: Relatethis to below video Obama creating a new branch to incarcerate indefinitely those who "He or the legislative" deems dangerous)>>>

...To preparesuch an assembly as this, and endeavour to set up the declared abettors of his own will, for the true representatives of the people, and the law-makers of the society, is certainly as >>>GREAT a BREACH OF TRUST, and as perfect a declaration of a "DESIGN" to SUBVERT the government, as is possible to be metwith.

To which, if one shall add rewards and punishments visibly employed to the
same end, and all the arts of perverted law made use of to take off and destroy all that stand in the way of such a >>"design", and will not comply and consent to betray the liberties of their country, it will be

>>>>past doubt what is doing.


What power they ought to have in the society who thus employ it
contrary tothe TRUST that along with it in its FIRST institution (Original Compact i.e. Constitution and limited delegated powers), is easy to determine; and one cannot but see that he who has once attempted any such thing as this >>>cannot any longer be trusted."

--------------------

See this in the Declaration of Independence  " ... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariablythe same object, evinces a "DESIGN" to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their RIGHT, it is theirDUTY, to throw off such government  and to provide new guards for their future security" and compare Locke 223-226)


Review again Thomas Jefferson's in the Kentucky Resolution #2; "No other Crimes Whatsoever":

Thomas Jefferson in the Kentucky Resolutions 1798:

"#2. Resolved, That  the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress  a power to:

a.) punish treason,
b.) counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States,
c.) piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas
(only), and
d.) offenses against the law of nations, and

>>>>>>>"NO  OTHER" CRIMES,

>>>>>>>"WHATSOEVER";"

 

---------------------
 

2.) Government Demonizing
that which should be EXALTED.

LOCAL MILITIAS

 

George Mason ten years earlier warning of the demonizing of the militia by governments illustrated the dangers:


Mr. GEORGE MASON (Virginia Ratifying conventions 6-16-1788): "asked towhat purpose the laws were read. The objection was, that >>>too much power was given to Congress power that would finally destroy the state governments more effectually by insidious, >>>underhanded means, than such as could be openly practiced.

This, said he, is the opinion of many worthy men, not only in this Convention, but in all parts of America.
These laws could only show that the legislature of this state could pass such acts. He thought they militated against the cession of this power to Congress, because the state governments could call forth the militia when necessary, so as to compel a submission to the laws; and as they were competent to it, Congress ought not to have the power.

George Mason then Warns of the danger:

The meeting of three or fourpersons might be called an insurrection,
(APP: by the federal government) and the militia (Now it would be standing army under control of congress) might be called out to disperse them. (i.e. against the people and their liberties for "the federal or state government's" own purposes)

He was not satisfiedwith {416} the explanation of the word "organization" by the gentleman in the military line, (Mr. Lee.)

He thought they were not confined to the technical explanation, but that Congress could inflict severe and ignominious punishments on the militia
(APP: then, ALL the people), as a necessary incident to the power of organizingand disciplining them. The gentleman had said there wasno danger, because the laws respecting the militia were less rigid in theother states than this. This was NO conclusive argument. His fears, as he had before expressed, were, that grievous punishments would be inflicted, in order to render the service disagreeable to the "militia themselves", and "induce them" to wish its abolition, >>>>>which would afford a >>>>"pretence" for establishing a "standing army".

(APP Note: This has already happened)

He was convinced
the STATE GOVERNMENT"Sought to have the control of the militia, except when they were absolutely necessary for general purposes. The gentlemanhad said that they would be "only subject to martial law when in "actualservice". He demanded >>>>what was to hinder Congress from >>>inflicting it always, and making a >>>general law for the purpose.

(APP Note: This has already happened)

 >>>>If so, said he, it must finallyproduce, most infallibly, the annihilation of the state governments. These were his apprehensions; but he prayed God they might be groundless."

 

---------------

 

RELATED VIDEO

The below video has poor audio due to the person creating it having recorded music for effects; Best if volumeis lower to reduce static noise.

The presentation is however good and underscores the fact that government has created their own issues by stepping outside the limited delegated powers and have imposed upon the people
burdensome taxes, caused by the creation and support of Exclusive Privileged organizations such as:



a.)
Unions, with dictated maximum wages - salaries (prevailing wages) in and out of government forcingcitizens to pay them through arbitrary, unconstitutional and unconsensualtaxation;
 


*See Rights of Colonists "Governors have NO right to seek what theyplease"
 


b.) Corporations, and "exclusive privileged" government contracts that limit competition by actual individuals under the guise of free trade; Paid both exaggerated profits and also maximum wages & "professional" salaries (prevailing wages) through those contracts;

 

c.) Undelegated laws accepted by states in the form of "mandates" formed by Special Interests Groups created and paid through tax dollars assisted from a unconstitutional income tax that allows tax write-offs when moneys are given to "so called" "Non Profits" insuring steady flow of capital for support; Such "laws placing undo and arbitrary burdens upon the people and their properties;

Further aggravated by
Corporate funds to establish environmental lawsthey can benefit by, that limits outside competition;

and "land trusts" taking land out of private ownership and placing it into government hands so that it can only be accessed through large corporate exclusive privileged contracts.

 

d.) Undelegated (under the original compact) federal and state bureaucracies

As a result, harsh and unconstitutional regulations have been established without constitutional authority as a result of such laws and bureaucracies never delegated to any government through the constitution;

Therefor, as Thomas Jefferson has presented in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions such laws and regulations are "VOID" and of "NO FORCE".
 

-----------------

 

Below VIDEO Includes:


CSpan Coverage of Special Congressional panel and conference with Militias

Obama's Unlimited Detention Plan for those who would oppose his will even BEFORE they commit a crime; Proclaiming rule of law and yet defying the rule of law in one breath:

Review again Thomas Jefferson's words in the Kentucky Resolutions - #2 limiting the federal government to prosecuting only those crimes delegated to it and: "No other crimes whatsoever"


Militias Training to Protect the Constitution as it was written andintended.

Remember, that the correct definition for militia are those local citizens, individuals or groups, defined by James Madison: "Officered bymen chosen among themselves";

If not, it is not a militia. All other definitions are fabrications.  If chosen by government, they are a standing army.

George Mason on the definition of militia: Warns of the now present dangers if they change from being what they were; That is that: "They are the whole people."

Mr. GEORGE MASON. Mr. Chairman, a worthy memberhas asked who are the militia, if they be not "the people" of this country,and if we are not to be protected from the fate of the Germans, Prussians, by OUR representation? I ask, Who are the militia? They consist now of the "whole people", except a few public officers. But I cannot say who will be the militia of the future day. If that paper on the table gets no alteration, the militia of the future day may not consist of all classes, high and low, and {426} rich and poor; butthey may be confined to the lower and middle classes of the people, granting exclusion to thehigher classes of the people. If we should ever see thatday, the most ignominious punishments and heavy fines may be expected.Under the present government, all ranks of people are subject to militiaduty (APP: "Local"). Under such a full and equal representation as "OURS", there can be no ignominious punishment inflicted. But under this "national", or rather "consolidated government", the case will be different. The representation being so "small and inadequate", they will have NO fellow-feeling for the people. They may discriminate people in their own predicament, and exempt from duty all the officers and lowest creatures of the "national government". If there werea more "particular definition of their powers", and a clause exempting themilitia from martial law except when in actual service, and from fines andpunishments of an unusual nature, then we might expect that the militia wouldbe what they are.

But, if this be not the case, we cannot say how long all classes of people will be included in the militia. There will not be the same reason to expect it, because the government will be administered by "different people".
We know what they are now, but know not how soon they may be altered. (for more see full day debate)

 

Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycmFVxtTa30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. JOHN MARSHALL asked if gentlemen were serious when they asserted that, if the state governments had power to interfere with the militia, it was by implication. If they were, he asked the committee whether the least attention would not show that they were mistaken. The state governments "DID NOT derive their powers from the general government"; but each government derived its powers from the people, and each was to "actaccording to the powers given it". Would any gentleman deny this? He demanded if powers not given were retained by implication. Could any man say so? Could any man say that this power was not retained by the states, as they had not given it away? For, says he, does not a power remain till it is given away? The state legislatures had power to command and govern their militia before, and have it still, undeniably, unless there be something in this Constitution that takes it away.

For
"Continental" purposes Congress may call forth the militia, as to suppress insurrections and repel invasions. But the power given to the states by the people is "NOT taken away"; for the Constitution does NOT say so. In the Confederation Congress hadthis power; but the state legislatures had it "also". The power oflegislating given them within the ten miles square is exclusive of the states,because it is expressed to be exclusive. The truth is, that whenpower is given to the general legislature, if it was in the state legislature before, both shall exercise it; unless there be an incompatibility in the exercise by one to that by the other, or negative words precluding the state governments from it. But there are NO negative words here. It rests, therefore, with the STATES. To me it appears, then, unquestionable that the state governments can call forth the militia, in case the Constitution should be adopted, in the "same manner" as they could have done BEFORE its adoption. Gentlemen have said that the states cannot defend themselves without an application to Congress, because Congress can interpose!

Does not every man feel a refutation of the argument in his own breast?

I will show {420} that there
could not be a combination, between those who formed the Constitution, to take away this power.

All the restraints intended to be laid on the state governments (besides where an exclusive power is expressly given to Congress) are contained in the 10th section of the 1st article.

This power is
NOT included in the restrictions in that section. But what excludes every possibility of doubt, is the last part of it that "no state shall engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay."

When invaded, they "CAN" engage in war, as also when in "imminent danger". This clearly proves that the STATES can use the militia when they find it necessary."

 

-------------------

James Madison: ".....He saysthat one ground of complaint, at the beginning of the revolution, was, thata standing army was quartered upon us. This was not the whole complaint. We complained because it was done without the "LOCAL Authority" of this country without the CONSENT of the people of America. As to the exclusion of standing armies in the bill of rights of the states, we shall find that though, in one or two of them, there is something like a prohibition, yet, in most of them, it is only provided that no armies shall be kept without the legislative authority; that is, without the CONSENT of the "community itself". Where is the impropriety of saying that we shall have all army, if necessary? Does not the notoriety of this constitute security? If inimical nations were to fall upon us when defenceless, what would be the consequence? Would it be wise to say, that we should have no defence? Give me leave to say, that the only possible way to provide against standing armies is to make them unnecessary.

The way to do this
is to organize and discipline our militia, so as to render"them" "capable" of defending the country against external invasions andinternal insurrections.

This organizing, was not to create a new form of organized militia, or a standing army, but to organize and arm ALL the people to empower themselves.

 

-------------------

 

Lets review other words of James Madison with regards to militias and standing armies; The purpose and the power ratio between them:

 

James Madison who wrote the Constitution together the Bill of Rights:

"The highest number to which a standing army can be carried in any country does not exceed one hundredth part of the souls, or
one twenty-fifth (1/25th) part of thenumber able to bear arms.

This portion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.

To "these"
would be opposed

(APP: indicating that the "militia" is to be a "opposing force" to the "standing army" as well as that of "foreign enemies")

a militia amounting to near half a million
CITIZENS witharms in their HANDS,

"officered by men chosen from"among themselves",

(not by government or the standing army)

fighting for "their" (the citizen / militia's) common liberties and united and conducted by government"S" possessing their (the citizen / militia's) affections and confidence.

It may well be doubted whether
a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a "proportion" of "regular troops";

(i.e. standing army: - i.e. Idiots proclaiming "ours is not to reason why" as some kind of worship to a mindless metaphor, or simply those who do not read what it is they should be fighting for, and don't ask;

Can you just imagine
any of the Founders making a statement "ours it not to "reason why"??? Of course not.

Thereby through
voluntary ignorance such blind soldiers become the Tyrants ultimate weapon, and his expendable fodder to be consumed for his arbitrary will as they fight against what they think they are fighting for;  Feeling powerless having given oath to something that has been so completely corrupted, to do anything else but to "obey orders"; or fearful of retribution through it, falling prey to the "false notion" in believing anyone has a power ofcasting off his own consent; and must simply "comply". See John Locke - consent: 16, 17,138, 139, 168, 172, 175, 179, >>>186, ...)


Besides the advantageof being armed, it forms a barrier against the "enterprises of ambition", more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.

The governments of Europe are afraid to trust
the people with arms.

If they did, the people would surely shake off the yoke of tyranny, as America
did.

Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession than the
debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors."

-----