Ron Paul for President!

Ron Paul gains popular vote across US pulling in Constitutional Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians and Independents;

History repeats itself; The Warnings are clear. Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate that hears it.


Alexis de Tocqueville [Alexis Charles Henri Maurice Clerel, le Comte de Tocqueville] (1805-1859) French historian:

"The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can "bribe" the people with their own money."



Samuel Adams - Rights of the Colonists 1772:

The inhabitants of this country in all probability in a few years will be more numerous, than those of Great Britain and Ireland together; yet it is absurdly expected [Volume 5, Page 397] by the promoters of the present measures, that these, with their posterity to all generations, should be easy while their property, shall be disposed of by a house of commons at three thousand miles distant from them;

and who CANNOT be supposed to have the least care or concern for their real interest: Who have not only NO natural care for their interest, but must be in effect "bribed" against it; as every burden they lay on the colonists is so much saved or gained to themselves. Hitherto many of the Colonists have been free from Quit Rents; but if the breath of a British house of commons can originate an act for taking away all our money, our lands will go next or be subject to rack rents from haughty and relentless landlords who will ride at ease, while we are trodden in the dirt. The Colonists have been branded with the odious names of traitors and rebels, only for complaining of their grievances; How long such treatment will, or ought to be born is submitted.


The income and or any flat percentage tax is and will continue to be used against the people.

Ron Paul plans to remove and prohibit such taxes.

Know of any other candidate that would?



 

Rasmussen Poll:

76% of Tea Party members

will vote for RON PAUL!!!;

Ron Paul,

The true Tea Party Favorite!
 

Orlando, Florida, Republican Party Presidential Debate 9-22-2011 Review


Ron Paul was the true winner, because his message was clear and concise.

By limiting the federal government to only it's limited DELEGATED powers, it would not be able to grant exclusive privileges that would hinder or suppress free trade, or stand in the way of true independent business.

The economy would grow because government would not be where it was never meant to be.

The issue is not "JOBS"; the Issue is unhindered independent free "BUSINESS"; "Jobs" will simply be the result.

When you hear "jobs" by the status quo Republicans and Democrats, it is because they want to maintain peoples dependency on large collectives (collective title) whether it is government & Unions or state born exclusive privileged corporations (which are "fictitious" individuals in law - but are large social collectives in fact);

The last thing collectives want is true free (actual) independent (title) trade as that would compete with them. An example is that Oil Companies have always hated competition from "Wild Cat" private oil companies.... nothing has changed.

Perry, Cain and Romney are just status quo politicians that love collectivism and the corruption that follows...Romney makes global Warming Speeches and Perry actually campaigned for Gore as a democrat; They only use catch phrases that "hint" of Ron Paul's stands to confuse voters so that they can get their vote... If any of the others get in, it will be status quo, all over again.

Let's not let that happen....

We have the RARE Opportunity to vote for a true Constitutionalist.


Remember to Register as a Republican 12 weeks before primaries

Then Promote and VOTE in the Primaries as a Republican:


                           so that you can vote:      


                     RON PAUL

      Republican Choice for President!





VIDEOS:

Ron Paul Florida Debate Highlights:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsrxdF5by QM

LPAC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JNhHg4hh g4&NR=1

Review on Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWiCY5Fa A0U&feature=pyv

Alex Jones  Ron Paul tipping Point
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=hnq MovlETmk

Michael Savage Interviews Ron Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=dqw 5nEmvnho




 

DANGERS AND STATUS QUO CANDIDATES

Regarding the folly of following candidates that intend to continue the status quo of maintaining the size and invasiveness of the federal government, such as Herman Cain, Mitt Romney and others;

The problem with Herman Cain, is that he works within the (UNconstitutional) system;

His history shows that he would treat government as a "business" and not as a "servitude";

This is the exact problem we have now, because when you operate a "business", you will naturally protect the "business" first (i.e. the government bureaucracy), not necessarily the consumer (the citizens);

Cain's 9-9-9 tax plan proves this intent.

When you operate a "servitude" under a "free republic", which is the correct way to run a free government, first you must obey the principles and limitations established in the "ORIGINAL COMPACT" that the republic was first formed:


John Locke:

136. Secondly, the legislative or supreme authority cannot assume to itself a power to rule by extemporary arbitrary decrees, but is bound to dispense justice and decide the rights of the subject by promulgated standing laws, 11 (APP Note: See these exact words in the Rights of the Colonists)

137. Absolute arbitrary power, or governing without settled standing laws, can neither of them consist with the ends of society and government...

138. Thirdly, the supreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent.  (APP Note: See these exact words in the Rights of the Colonists) For the >>>>preservation of property being the "end of government" (i.e. the PURPOSE of Government)

155. It may be demanded here, what if the executive power, being possessed of the force of the commonwealth, shall make use of that force to hinder the meeting and acting of the legislative, when the ORIGINAL constitution or the public exigencies require it? I say, using force upon the people, without authority, and "contrary to the trust" put in him that does so, >>>is a state of war with the people, who have a right to reinstate their legislative in the exercise of their power. For having erected a legislative with an intent they should exercise the power of making laws, either at certain set times, or when there is need of it, when they are hindered by any force from what is so necessary to the society, and wherein the safety and preservation of the people consists, the people have a right to remove it by force. In all states and conditions the true remedy of force without authority is to oppose force to it. The use of force without authority always puts him that uses it into a "state of war as the aggressor", and renders him liable to be "treated accordingly".

194. Their persons are free by a native right, and their properties, be they more or less, are their own, and at their own dispose, and not at his; or else it is no property. Supposing the conqueror gives to one man a thousand acres, to him and his heirs for ever; to another he lets a thousand acres, for his life, under the rent of L50 or L500 per annum. Has not the one of these a right to his thousand acres for ever, and the other during his life, paying the said rent? And hath not the tenant for life a property in all that he gets over and above his rent, by his labour and industry, during the said term, supposing it be double the rent? Can any one say, the king, or conqueror, after his grant, may, by his power of conqueror, take away all, or part of the land, from the heirs of one, or from the other during his life, he paying the rent? Or, can he take away from either the goods or money they have got upon the said land at his pleasure? If he can, then all free and voluntary contracts cease, and are void in the world; there needs nothing but power enough to dissolve them at any time, and all the grants and promises of men in power are but mockery and collusion. For can there be anything more ridiculous than to say, I give you and yours this for ever, and that in the surest and most solemn way of conveyance can be devised, and yet it is to be understood that I have right, if I please, to take it away from you again to-morrow ...." Relate this to US Land Patents absolute granting of properties and the Attempt of the Federal Government to condemn such land (or water by common law attached to the land) later, or the state to condemn such property after giving consent to adjudicate such transfer by authority of the United States by which it was a party, or to create new regulations upon it after granting it with none; To encircle that land in national monument and control the inroads and water, or to regulate limits to anything with regard to it, or to arbitrarily tax it into debt and thereby rendering the land not owned but rented, when no taxes were in established at the receiving of it, or to tax it without consent, or tax without consent for things built upon that property to improve its value, or raised upon it to derive sustenance and earnings from his labors, or derive any such without consent from those he wills it to. And you will find the neither the federal government, nor the state government has no power to do so, nor has any power of such been delegated to it by the original compact(s). For once property is possessed of a person, it is any governments duty to protect it, and not to devise a design to wrest it away after all rights had been released ; As this clearly established by Locke that the protection of property is the "purpose of government" and the "reason" that the person enters into society.

222: "...whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from "any farther obedience", and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence. Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear, folly, or corruption, (APP Note: See this in Samuel Adams Statement within the Rights of the Colonists, 1772:  "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.") ....endeavour to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other, (Such as under undelegated/ mandated federal powers or the United Nations) an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this "BREACH of TRUST" they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty, and by the establishment of a new legislative (such as they shall think fit), provide for their own safety and security, (APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence) which is the end for which they are in society.

243. To conclude. The power that every individual gave the society when he entered into it can never revert to the individuals again, as long as the society lasts, but will always remain in the community; because without this there can be no community -- no commonwealth, which is contrary to the ORIGINAL agreement;





Samuel Adams - Rights of the Colonists: "

When Men enter into Society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demand and insist upon the performance of such conditions, And previous LIMITATIONS as form an equitable "ORIGINAL COMPACT".--



Under our ORIGINAL COMPACT, all taxes must be enumerated and consensually accepted before being collected, and only after taking a consensus of the population so everyone knows how much will need to be collected from TARIFFS.


Constitution Article 1, Section 9. (Original Compact)

"No Capitation, or OTHER direct, Tax shall be laid, UNLESS in "Proportion to the Census" or "Enumeration" herein >>>>>>"BEFORE" directed to be taken."


Since the income tax is an arrogated power exceeding the limits of the delegated power of enumerated taxation, it remains unconstitutional because the federal government is expressly prohibited from arrogating any new power and the amendment and ratifying process (i.e. a MEANS to make changes) was limited to making changes only WITHIN the DELEGATED powers; and can "NOT take ONE STEP" beyond.


Amendment XVI (Compare to Article 1 Section 9 of the ORIGINAL COMPACT above and limitations below)

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census of enumeration."



Now lets look at the two things the federal government can collect taxes for:


See Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788;

George Nicholas: > that this "GENERAL WELFARE" was united, "NOT" to "the general power of legislation", but to the >particular power> of laying and collecting taxes, imposts, and excises, for the "PURPOSE" of paying the "DEBTS" and providing for the "COMMON DEFENCE", that is, that they could raise AS MUCH money as would pay the DEBTS and provide for the "COMMON DEFENCE", in >>>"consequence of this power". The clause which was affectedly called the sweeping clause contained "NO new grant of power" ......If I understand it right, NO "new" power can be exercised.

Edmund Pendleton: "...With respect to the necessity of the ten miles square being superseded by the subsequent clause, which gives them power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers VESTED (i.e. Very LIMITED and DELEGATED) by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof, I understand that clause as NOT going a "SINGLE STEP BEYOND" the "DELEGATED powers". What can it act upon? Some power given by THIS Constitution. If they should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the "DELEGATED powers",

but can by >>>>>>>"NO MEANS" depart from them,


>>>>(N)OR "ARROGATE" "ANY NEW" powers; for the >>>PLAIN LANGUAGE of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give "effect" to the >>>"DELEGATED" powers".



Also, government employees cannot "seek what they please" .....Union involvement however allows government employees to "seek what they please";


Samuel Adams - Absolute Rights of the Colonists 1772:

....."In the state of nature men may as the Patriarchs did, employ hired servants for the defence of their lives, liberty and property: and they should pay them reasonable wages. Government was instituted for the purposes of common defence; and those who hold the reins of government have an equitable natural right to an honourable support from the same principle "that the labourer is worthy of his hire" but then the same community which they serve, ought to be assessors of their pay: Governors have NO RIGHT to SEEK WHAT THEY PLEASE; by this, instead of being content with the station assigned them, that of honourable servants of the society, they would soon become Absolute masters, Despots, and Tyrants. Hence as a private man has a right to say, what wages he will give in his private affairs, so has a Community to determine what they will give and grant of their Substance, for the Administration of publick affairs. And in both cases more are ready generally to offer their Service at the "proposed and stipulated price", than are "able and willing" to perform their duty.--



Under a free government, corporations cannot exist because they cannot exist without the state granting them the privilege of "cartel"; And in a free government exclusive privileges granted by government are prohibited;

Virginia Declaration of Rights:  IV That no "man", or "set of men", are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public services; which, not being descendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator, or judge be hereditary.

This would not exclude contracts, but would remove the government from granting privileges of one or more people over another which would provide true free trade and not exclusive privileged trade;



Cain, as with Romney and others are "well versed" in Corporations, and will have the mindset of promoting corporations, which are in fact state born exclusive privileged trade, as free trade, which they are "NOT".

See the effects of "state born exclusive privileged trade" at 2009 Privileges & Contracts;



What needs to be asked, is NOT if one can run a successful "business";

But if one can "obey the limitations" set down in a free LIMITED republic as it was "originally intended" so that our freedoms are maintained;

....and can they maintain a LIMITED "SERVITUDE"; within those limitations. so that the people are not impoverished, enslaved or have their properties placed in jeopardy;


John Locke - 201:

"It is a mistake to think this fault is proper only to monarchies. Other forms of government are liable to it as well as that; for WHEREVER the power that is put in any hands for the government of the people and the preservation of their properties is applied to "OTHER ends", and made use of to IMPOVERISH, HARASS, or SUBDUE them to the ARBITRARY and IRREGULAR commands of those that have it, THERE it presently becomes TYRANNY, whether those that thus use it are one or many. Thus we read of the thirty tyrants at Athens, as well as one at Syracuse; and the intolerable dominion of the Decemviri at Rome was nothing better."


Cain's 9-9-9 tax (another BUY, SELL and TRADE tax system) shows conclusively that he wants to maintain the wasteful government as it is; at the expense of the people and their freedoms.

The 9-9-9 plan Cain promotes as with other flat percentage tax systems (such as the FairTax and Flat Tax) establish taxes in which the government "SEEKS WHAT THEY PLEASE".

There is no sign that he wishes to reduce the already exceeded powers taken by the federal government;

But to EXPAND THOSE POWERS; and by this he is VERY dangerous;

As are all those candidates wishing to maintain the Status Quo;.

The only candidate showing the will to LIMIT the federal government to it's Original Delegated powers is Ron Paul.

Ron Paul's Plan?

The 0-0-0 Plan that will limit federal taxes to tariffs;

Remove the income tax, prohibit federal sales, etc.  taxes and remove the IRS.

What more can you ask?

Richard Taylor
Chair
American Patriot Party.CC
American Patriot Party of Oregon

































 

Ron Paul News

2012
ELECTIONS
 

THE CONSTITUTION MATTERS!
 

LET'S GET RON PAUL AS PRESIDENT WHO WILL OBEY IT!

IGNORE THE REST
VOTE THE BEST!

Support RON PAUL at:

RON PAUL 2012.com!
 

Follow the Campaign at Campaign for Liberty!   Become a Member and Get Active!
 

 

Ron Paul Wins Straw Polls!
 

Read Lew Rockwell on Ron Paul and Polls; What is, and is not necessary to win.


* Ron Paul  WINNER! Annual Values Voter Summit Straw Poll in Washington, D.C.;

By a HUGE MARGIN!!!

Ron Paul 37%
Herman Cain 23%
Rick Santorum 16%
Rick Perry 8%
Michele Bachmann 8%
Mitt Romney 4%
Gingrich 3%
Huntsman 0%


Ron Paul Florida Debate Highlights:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsrxdF5byQM

* Ron Paul  WINNER!   Florida Fox News Poll - Fox News  Pulls it's OWN Poll Chart to hide Ron Paul leading Mitt Romney by 11,000 Votes!!!;

(Fox News Screen Shot Source - Infowars):

We would be willing to change this declaration to 2nd place, if  Fox News will post the unchanged poll numbers AND Chart.


Florida Fox News Republican Presidential Debate Poll Results, Showing Ron Paul the Debate National Opinion Winner;

Results Corresponding with Fox News Graph:

Mitt Romney 22.89% - 16,073 Votes
Rick Perry 12.8% - 8,989 Votes
Newt Gingrich 6.99% - 4,906 Votes
Ron Paul 39.27% - 27,573 Votes!!!
Rick Santorium 1.44% - 1,014 Votes
Gary Johnson 1.95% - 1,366 Votes
Herman Cain 10.81% - 7, 592 Votes
Jon Huntsman 1.59% - 1,118 Votes

Info Wars Links to Articles and the full size screen shot of Fox News Florida Republican Debate Poll:

http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-poll-ron-paul-wins-orlando-debate

http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-pulls-poll-showing-ron-paul-debate-victory-claims-mitt-romney-won

Herman Cain's (Hermy ObamaCain) win in the Florida Republican Party Straw Poll can hardly be considered a win for conservative Republicans;

It looks like there is a group of  983 Dependent Republican Government Union Floridians that love Cain's proposed OBAMACAIN Buy, Sell and Trade Tax policy; A UNENUMERATED FLAT PERCENTAGE TAXATION that will guarantee money to government, Unions, Wasteful corporate contracts, tax supported special interest groups, and undelegated state and federal mandated bureaucracies.....

I would say not just a few good 'ol Union, government employee and government corporate contract recipient boys and girls worked their way into that vote.... .

So much for federal limitations set out in the Original Constitution.

---------------

 

Ron Paul National Polls Winner!

By just looking at the numbers in the major national opinion polls; Ron Paul is the overall polls and opinion winner by a wide margin in numbers of votes cast across the United States.


* Ron Paul WINNER California Republican Straw Poll taking 44.9% of the votes cast.

Ron Paul (374 - 44.9%)
Rick Perry (244, 29.3%)
Mitt Romney (74, 8.8%)
Michele Bachmann (64, 7.7%)
Jon Huntsman (17, 2.0%)
Herman Cain (15, 1.8%)
Newt Gingrich (14, 1.7%)
Thad McCotter (7, 0.8%)
Rick Santorum (7, 0.8%)
Gary Johnson (2, 0.2%)
Fred Karger (1, 0.1%)
Write-ins (15, 1.8%)

* Ron Paul WINNER of CNBC Televised California Republican Presidential Debate Poll by 75% of 7000+ votes in two hours before CNBC pulled down the poll to keep it from being seen!!!


* Ron Paul WINNER 2011 Conservatives Choice at CPAC (two consecutive years)


* Ron Paul WINNER 2011 Louisiana Republican Leadership Conference Straw Poll

Ron Paul 612
Huntsman 382
Bachmann 191
Cain 104
Romney 74
Gingrich 69
Palin 41
Santorum 30
Pawlenty 18
Johnson 10
Roemer 9
McCotter 2




* Ron Paul Statistical Tie for "First Place"  with a mere 152 votes separating Bachman as they split the votes in the Iowa Caucus Straw Poll.


IOWA Straw Poll Results:

Results of the Iowa Straw Poll in case you haven't actually seen them:

1.  Michele Bachmann (4823, 28.55%)
2. Ron Paul                      (4671, 27.65%)

3. Governor Tim Pawlenty (2293, 13.57%)
4. Senator Rick Santorum (1657, 9.81%)
5. Herman Cain (1456, 8.62%)
6. Governor Rick Perry (718, 3.62%) write-in
7. Governor Mitt Romney (567, 3.36%)
8. Speaker Newt Gingrich (385, 2.28%)
9. Governor Jon Huntsman (69, 0.41%)
10. Congressman Thad McCotter (35, 0.21%)



BUT LOOK at This IOWA Topix / Google Republican Presidential Debate National Opinion POLL!

Below Iowa Republican Party Presidential POLLING MAP & ARTICLE;

Google the story, "look at all that Ron Paul Green" or this RonPaulForums.Com link

Google / Topix Iowa Straw Poll MAP
Updated Figures as of 9-25-11
6,288 Active Cities - Updated - 8,039
24,265 Total Votes - Updated 44,191

Ron Paul - 11,516 !!! - UPDATED 28,034!!!
Gingrich 4889 - Updated - 5,920
Cain 2570 - Updated - 3,225
Romney 1941 - Updated - 2,516
Bachman 1909 - Updated - 2,415
Santorium 858 - Updated - 1,048
Huntsman 323 - Updated - 452
Pawlenty 259 - Updated - 337

R3publican Story and Poll map:

http://r3publican.wordpress.com/2011/08/12/who-won-the-fox-debate-poll-map-is-ron-paul-green-tonight

Ron Paul Forum Alternate Poll Map Link

GoogleRonPaulIowaStrawPoll.jpg







*WINNER 2011 New Hampshire Young Republicans Straw Pole!

46%  for Ron Paul!!!

and only a MESSILY 10% for 2nd place Mitt Romney.





 

MEDIA ATTEMPTS RON PAUL BLACKOUT!
 

Other News: Left wing and Corporate Right Wing (Fox and others) media, is avoiding mention of Ron Paul who is the clear front runner, for fear of fanning the flames Ron Paul has ignited in the people who understand that the Constitution is the only answer to bind down the federal government, stop their wasteful practices and remove burdensome regulations that keep communities and free enterprise from prospering.

Ron Paul's obvious momentum is unquestionable and his understanding of Constitutional matters unmatched; This worries the status quo of big spending Democrats and Republicans.

The Media is making a clearly transparent attempt to prop up the weakest and least experienced candidates to lessen the danger to Obama, or if  necessary, establish a patsy; Their invented news reports skip from Bachman to Perry and Romney without so much as a mention of Ron Paul's name who split the Votes almost evenly in the Ames Iowa Straw Poll;

This is a clear tactic where the media purposely play to the elbow rubbing Democrats and Republicans to promote those who are the most ignorant to true constitutional matters; such as Romney, Perry, Bachman who will be the easiest to manipulate if they make it to the White House.

Ron Paul, clearly the front runner in the battle for freedom and limited government, is the only real candidate with a unquestionable track record as the champion of the Constitution. The people would be well served in giving their support to his campaign.
 

BLACK OUT THIS.
 

LOOK OUT!
for the
Liberal Plants!
 

Rick Perry's long past in the Democratic Party and past campaigning for Al Gore, causes republicans  to back away; as the truth be known!.

Rick Perry's life time Democrat and liberal leaning and "sudden" finding of "Constitutional religion"  and change to the Republican Party just before running for president smells of a "Plant" by the left.

Mitt Romney's Global Warming speeches drop his poll numbers drastically.
 

Rick Gore, Mitt Gore and Al Gore....

The three liberal Stooges!

And Now, Buy, Sell &Trade Flat 9-9-9 Tax Everything for bigger government...

Hermy "ObamaCain!"
 

-------