Editorial Political Cartoon Editorial

 About this Cartoon:

American Patriot viewpoint. You probably have heard the phrase "free nations" and "Democracies of a free world". The fact is that "total democracy" is total socialism. Total democracy lacks the essential ingredients of freedom and that is "certain, inalienable, rights". At this date in Iraq what we will be leaving behind is a social order that can be easily controlled from abroad and a people who will be ruled by a government that can change with the wind of a vote or a power struggle.




Unless Iraq enacts a bill of rights to limit their government's powers, and list certain inalienable rights of the individual (i.e. "these truths being self evident" of the Declaration of Independence), which are the essential building blocks of a truly free country, then what we have created is a temporary subjugated peace which will leave that country and its citizens again at the mercy and control of a central socialist power.... liberated from one tyranny and tossed into the hands of another.

The U.S. "federal" government likes to preach freedom and free trade but rarely wants, practices or promotes "truly" free "states" in the world, (and hates free trade within the US as it cannot keep control of it, i.e. reason for the income tax) even when that is it's and any truly free citizen's first right and duty to do.

The only reason the total Democracies are at peace now, is that there is a single free republic "people" in power that respects these certain rights and watches to see that neither our own federal government servants (note the US does not have leaders, but only servants) and the other socialist leaders of the world do not step on their people too much. If we fall, watch what happens.

In other words, we'll be back because the federal government did not truly liberate the "people" by educating them to the responsibilities of true freedom, did not establish inalienable rights and did not establish safeguards in the government to protect it's free citizens from being lead by leaders and laws of a total mob rule democracy that can as easily vote any freedoms gained away.

Something that cannot happen in a "truly" free country, i.e.:

"If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave."

John Adams, Rights of the Colonists, 1772
----------

To a response to this cartoon which presented believing that democracies allow for change in government:

 That is the purpose of democracy. But because democracy is a simple function and not a description of freedom, it is not freedom without certain inalienable rights of the individual. This is the danger of governments promoting it as such without these safeguards that establish the true definition of freedom.

The same reason that capitalism is a function and not a description of freedom and also a danger of governments promoting it as such.

This was clear at the start of this country when fiscal reasoning attempted to raise the issue regarding freedom and fiscal security;

Here a Founding Father of Freedom made it clear:

Samuel Adams - American Patriot & Politician 1722 - 1803 

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace.

We seek not your counsel, nor your arms.

Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

For more information on true freedom, see the Oregon Patriot Party serving National Headquarters for the American Patriot Party

George Mason when the Constitution was being debated:

"To disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them."

For more information on the intent of the Founders of freedom,

See the American Patriot Party (.CC)




Editorial Cartoonist Richard Taylor - News Paper & Magazine Editorial Cartoonist - Editorial Cartoons for the Professional Editorial Article, News Paper, Magazine or Periodical; Political Cartoonist - Editorial Cartoonist and Political Cartoonist and Political Comics. .
In The News: New Editorial Political Commentary PEEP & CHEEP!
E-mail Richard

"If you don't see a editorial cartoonist cartoon, then you probably don't deserve a editorial cartoonist cartoon. "Specializing in tastefully presented concrete boots and concrete swim wear fashions in pen and ink.

Richard Taylor Editorial Cartoonist - See and find Richard Taylor under Professional Editorial Cartoonist Richard Taylor and Professional Editorial cartoons markets wherever Professional Editorial Political Richard Taylor News Paper Cartoonists for hire and Professional Editorial (Pro) Political Editorial News Magazine (Mag) Political Cartoonists Section Cartoons and Professional Editorial (Pro) Comics Directories are sold. (or just e-mail now)

About the Pen: Richard Taylor creator of Green Springs - Pro Toonerz - Graphic Design - Buster Bass - NASA
Political Views:  Read the 40 Grievances of the Declaration of Independence which clearly present what freedom is not ; The opposite which freedom is.  Read the little one page Document and know what freedom means instead of waiving a flag for the sake of Blind Nationalism of which one can not even define.

Member of the new, American Patriot Party.CC - Oregon Patriot Party
Richard Taylor Professional Editorial cartoonist, cartoons and comics. Editorial Political News Paper and Magazine Cartoons. Professional Editorial Cartoonist and Political Cartoonist Richard Taylor, specializing in tastefully presented concrete boots and concrete swim wear fashions in pen and ink. Richard Taylor Editorial Cartoonist - See and find Richard Taylor under Professional Editorial Cartoonist Richard Taylor and Professional Editorial cartoons markets wherever Professional Editorial Political Richard Taylor News Paper Cartoonists for hire and Professional Editorial (Pro) Political Editorial News Magazine (Mag) Political Cartoonists Section Cartoons and Professional Editorial (Pro) Comics Directories are sold (or just e-mail now).



Cartoons Comics and More!

Counter by Rapid Axcess

 

Ron Paul on Federal Reserve:
Warning of having a secret banking institution that no one knows who owns or who is control of it:

Ron Paul questions poor finance policies of the finance committee:
























 

2008 Presidential Choices

Ron Paul clearly presents the only sane candidate running.

With his clear goals and strict Constitutional foundations of limited government, Ron Paul is far and beyond the pack as the only real choice for presidency.


The other three candidates are like a nightmare come true, with the hammers and sickles of socialism spewing from their mouths; If not in Social programs, in forced involuntary servitude of citizens in the continuation of a conflict with no defined end.

The all too obvious comparison of Obama, McCain and Clinton as the "Three Stooges" illustrates Three Democrats with one of them holding a Republican membership card. would be another accurate description.

McCaine's speeches of a continued war can be compared to the German Tank commander's script in the movie "Battle of the Bulge";

When asked if they were winning or loosing, he answered no to both; When asked what was the purpose, he answered, "So that they could wear the uniform and that the war was "to go on and on and on!"

Clinton doesn't want to end the war to save money, but only to create more massive social programs, so more people will become dependent on government ... and of course continue to vote accordingly.

Obama? Does anyone know what Obama will do?

The most I can draw from his speeches is to create another undelegated power to the federal government for a "national" health care system again a derivative of the unconstitutional income tax system to force everyone's compliance and invade everyone's privacy.

The second is undefinable declaration of  "change"....

Change to What?

Often politicians espouse change giving no basis or historical foundations of that change with regard to freedom's laws.

Nor how the directions of changes they intend will effect our freedoms.

The ideas are usually vague rhetoric, or not compliant to the intent of the founders had presented and declared in the Constitutional Debates of 1776 nor established in Common law and of Civil Government by John Locke whom our Founders derived their structure of free government from.

Ron Paul stands on the foundations and basic principles of freedom.

Everyone complains about unconstitutional taxes taken from them, so now we have a candidate that will do something and there are those that are contemplating anyone else?

This man is willing to even remove the federal reserve!

Any vote for anyone else but Ron Paul, is a vote for stupidity.