Private Property Cascade Siskiyou

Cascade Siskiyou National Monument, Jenny Creek, Jackson County Oregon

The BLM's Cascade Siskiyou Ecological Emphasis Area (CSEEA) maps target well over a dozen private property owners for possible acquisition of their land (alternative D found in vol. 2 page 42 map 42).

What our representatives should understand about BLM is that they first target what they plan on doing regardless of any opposition; then wait a few years and begin selling it to the public who have no opinion. Then years after that they pronounce that they are going ahead with their plans for the good of the public who in the greater masses still have no opinion; Then further pronounce they represent the whole of the people in their goals and actions!

The people who are most affected are then steam rolled against their will. Wake Up!

Here are just some of the peoples lives they have targeted to disrupt:

Private 1 .jpg

Private 2 .jpg

John Locke #2 Essay Concerning:
The True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government:

John Locke 38: "For the "preservation of property" being the end of government, and that for which men enter into society, it necessarily supposes and requires that the people should have property, without which they must be supposed to lose that by entering into society which was the end for which they entered into it; too gross an absurdity for any man to own. Men, therefore, in society having property, they have such a right to the goods, which by the law of the community are theirs, that nobody hath a right to take them, or any part of them, from them without their own consent; without this they have no property at all. "...

JCPLC Note: "Use" and "Possession" is "A PART" - Thereby Presidential Proclamations, Condemnation and Zoning have no place in a free country, as the ability of others to take property without consent or place arbitrary limits to the use of that part is clearly like having no property at all:

.... "For I have truly no property in that which another can by right take from me when he pleases against my consent.

Hence it is a "mistake" "to think" that the "supreme" or "legislative" power of any commonwealth can do what it will, and dispose of the estates of the >> subject<< arbitrarily, or take any part of them at pleasure.

This is not much to be feared in governments where the legislative consists wholly or in part in assemblies which are variable, whose members upon the dissolution of the assembly are subjects under the common laws of their country, "equally" with the rest.

But in governments where the legislative is in one >>> "lasting assembly, always in being"<<<, or in one man >>>as in "absolute monarchies"<<<

...there is danger still, that they will think themselves to have a "distinct interest" from the rest of the community, and so will be "apt" to "increase their own riches and power" by taking what "they think fit" from the people.

For a man's property is not at all secure, >>> though there be good and equitable laws to set the bounds of it between him and his fellow-subjects,<<< if he who commands those subjects have power to take from >>>"any private man"<<< what "part" he pleases of his property, and "use and dispose of it as "he thinks" good"."

John Locke 149: "....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving themselves from the "attempts" and "designs" of "anybody", even of their "legislators", whenever they shall be so "foolish" or so "wicked" as to lay and carry on "designs" against the liberties and "properties" of the subject.

For no man or society of men having a power to deliver up their preservation, or consequently the means of it, to the absolute will and arbitrary "dominion" of another, whenever any one shall go about to bring them into such a slavish condition, they will always have a right to preserve what they have not a power to part with, and to "rid" themselves of "those" who invade this fundamental, sacred, and unalterable law of self-preservation "for which" they "entered" into "society". ..."

Rights of the Colonists 1772:

Thirdly, The supreme power (i.e. Legislative) >>>cannot "Justly" take from "any man", "any part" of his "property"<<<>>> without his "consent", <<<>>> in person<<< >>>or by his "Representative".--<<<

John Locke 176. That the aggressor, who puts himself into the state of war with another, and unjustly invades another man's right, can, by such an unjust war, "never come to have a right over the conquered", will be easily agreed by all men, who will not think that robbers and pirates have a right of empire over whomsoever they have force enough to master, or that men are bound by promises which unlawful force extorts from them. Should a robber break into my house, and, with a dagger at my throat, make me seal deeds to convey my estate to him, would this give him any title? Just such a title by his sword has an unjust conqueror who forces me into submission. The injury and the crime is equal, whether committed by the wearer of a crown or some petty villain. The title of the offender and the number of his followers make no difference in the offence, unless it be to aggravate it.

The only difference is, great robbers punish little ones to keep them in their obedience; but the great ones are rewarded with laurels and triumphs, because they are too big for the weak hands of justice in this world, and have the power in their own possession which should punish offenders.

What is my remedy against a robber that so broke into my house? Appeal to the law for justice. But perhaps justice is denied, or I am crippled and cannot stir; robbed, and have not the means to do it. If God has taken away all means of seeking remedy, there is nothing left but patience. But my son, when able, may seek the relief of the law, which I am denied; he or his son may renew his appeal till he recover his right. But the conquered, or their children, have no court -- no arbitrator on earth to appeal to. Then they may appeal, as Jephtha did, to Heaven, and repeat their appeal till they have recovered the native right of their ancestors, which was to have such a legislative over them as the majority should approve and freely acquiesce in. If it be objected this would cause endless trouble, I answer, no more than justice does, where she lies open to all that appeal to her. He that troubles his neighbour without a cause is punished for it by the justice of the court he appeals to. And he that appeals to Heaven must be sure he has right on his side, and a right, too, that is worth the trouble and cost of the appeal, as he will answer at a tribunal that cannot be deceived, and will be sure to retribute to every one according to the mischiefs he hath created to his fellow-subjects -- that is, any part of mankind. From whence it is plain that he that conquers in an unjust war can thereby have no title to the subjection and obedience of the conquered.

John Locke 227. In both the aforementioned cases, when either the legislative is changed, or the legislators "act" "contrary to the end" for "which they were constituted", "those who are" guilty are guilty of rebellion.

For if any one by force takes away the established legislative of any society, and the laws by them made, pursuant to their trust, he thereby takes away "the umpirage" which every one had consented to for a peaceable decision of all their controversies, and a bar to the state of war amongst them.

They who remove or change the legislative take away this decisive power, which nobody can have but by the appointment and consent of the people, and so destroying the authority which the people did, and nobody else can, set up, and introducing a power which the people hath not authorized, "actually introduce a state of war", which is that of "force without authority"; and thus by removing the legislative established by the society, in whose decisions the people acquiesced and united as to that of their own will, they untie the knot, and expose the people anew to the state of war. And if those, who by force take away the legislative, are rebels, the legislators themselves, as has been shown, can be "no less esteemed so", when they who were set up for the protection and preservation of the people, their "liberties" and "properties" shall by "force invade and endeavour" to "take them away";

and so they putting themselves into a state of war with those who made them the protectors and guardians of their peace, are properly, and with the greatest aggravation, rebellantes, rebels.

This Clearly establishes that our government (s) can by their actions against our liberties and our properties be declared "Rebels" against the Citizens and against the laws of Freedom.

This means the term rebelion is not a title only to be worn upon any side opposing a standing power, but in these cases, is clearly worn upon the standing power itself.

Counter by Rapid Axcess

Cascade Siskiyou National Monument Cascade Siskiyou National Monument

Welcome to Pacific Westcom. The Pacific West Coast's premiere US Pacific West Command Web Center Station for US Pacific News, US pacific west weather, US pacific west coast travel, US pacific west coast entertainment usarpac and world wideaccess to the best international & US sites on the Web

Serving the US West Coast States of Alaska, Canada, Washington, Oregon,California and Mexico. US West North to US West South, we have the informationyou need! Just take a look at these sites at your finger tips!

Remember us: Pacific West com.com

US Pacific Westcom your One Stop US Pacific West Command Web Station for US Pacific News! Take Command of your US fleet! Click here for frames . Cgsc Afcea Amc Mtmc Usarpac Uspacom Medcom Forscom Usasoc; a PWN weather sponsored link

Christian Science Monitor News, Your Major International News Central Command Center:

The Links you want:

Editorial News Press Release, Local News, National News and International Press Releases:

Freedom and Patriotic Sites, Declaration of Independence and Constitutional Sites;

Pacific News, World News

True American Freedom begins with education of the Declaration of Independence and the 40 Grievances that define 40 definitions to recognize tyranny in government.Have you read them?

Read the Declaration of Independence now at the Oregon Patriot Party http://www.oregonpatriotparty.com

Educating civilians, military, militia and the world about true American freedom defined by the founding fathers of this country.

Oregon Patriot Party of the American Patriot Party and CDF, educating true freedom and justice, one Patriot at a time.

Thomas Jefferson:

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.

I do not add 'within the limits of the law', because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual. ~~"American Patriot Party National Headquarters

True American Patriots, True American Patriotism. The Democratic Republic of Jefferson - Inalienable Rights, States Rights, Local Control

Subjects Covered: US Monument News Directory Report: US United States Government, BLM, US Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, US Federal Government and the Cascade Siskiyou National Monument. National Environmental News and Events. Klamath Falls Adjudication, Klamath Project and FERC Federal Energy Commission on the California Oregon boarder. Water, power, fish passage, Indian, ranchers, farmers and irrigation district disputes news and information. USA boarder water law and policies. Laws on water rights and grazing rights. Lease land grazing Federal Oregon and California environmental law disputes on monument's policy in the west. Politics of Private Land Rights, Federal Land Rights, Federal Water Rights and Private Water Rights. Jenny Creek Private Lands Coalition, Cascade National Monument News Directory Reports: US United States Government, BLM, US Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, US Federal Government and the Cascade Siskiyou National Monument law and update. National Environmental News and Events. Klamath Falls Adjudication, Klamath Project and FERC Federal Energy Commission on the California Oregon boarder. Water, power, fish passage, Indian, ranchers, farmers and irrigation district disputes news and information. USA boarder water law and policies. Laws on water rights and grazing rights. Lease land grazing Federal Oregon and California environmental law disputes on monument's policy in the west. Politics of Private Land Rights, Federal Land Rights, Federal Water Rights and Private Water Rights. US Monument News Directory Reports: US United States Government, BLM, US Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, US Federal Government and the Cascade Siskiyou National Monument. National Environmental News and Events. Klamath Falls Adjudication, Klamath Project and FERC Federal Energy Commission on the California Oregon boarder. Water, power, fish passage, Indian, ranchers, farmers and irrigation district disputes news and information. USA boarder water law and policies. Laws on water rights and grazing rights. Lease land grazing Federal Oregon and California environmental law disputes on monument's policy in the west. Politics of Private Land Rights, Federal Land Rights, Federal Water Rights and Private Water Rights