American Patriot Party. Home of the American Patriots of the American Patriot Party (.CC).

Site Index:

National American Patriot Party and Oregon Patriot Party Home

What Makes us Different

True American Patriotism

Freedom, Public Opinion
Consent and the Law Against Condemnation of Any Man's Property.

Socialism as Defined by the American Patriot Party

Slavery

Voluntary Slavery

Existence of Slavery

Distant Legislatures

American Patriot Party Platform and Goals

American Patriot Party and Oregon Party  Stands on Issues

Curbing Enterprises of Ambition and Establishing Barriers against Socialist Collectives.

Foundations of Inalienable Rights

Universal Definition of Political Left and Political Right

American Patriot Party News Letters

2006 Division of Power
2007 Fundamental Laws

What People are Saying about the American Patriot Party

Stand Against National ID - either for Man, Animal or other property

   Ron Paul Endorsement

       


Patriots Papers Index:

Magna Carta 1215
Locke Church, State & Man 1689
Locke Civil Government 1689
Rights of the Colonists 1772
Witherspoon Confederation 1774
Massachusetts Declaration
Virginia Declaration of Rights
Witherspoon Providence 1776
Declaration of Independence 1776
Articles of Confederation 1777
Founders Letters of Intent
Conventions and Debates 1787
U.S. Constitution 1788
Bill of Rights 1791
Virginia - Kentucky Resolutions


Great Resources for Founders Documents

University of Chicago, Founders Constitution
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founder s/indexes/indexes.html

Constitution.Org
http://www.constitution.org



Patriots Organization Committee
Oregon State Elections
Secretary of State Notice
Join the American Patriot Party
Volunteer Patriots
Fundraising
Oregon Patriot Party
American Patriot Party

State Party Guidelines

The States Liberty Bill

Patriots Party Products
American Patriot Party Graphics
Party  Political Cartoons


Compare Differences between the American Patriot Party and other political parties.


American Patriot Party
Endorses Candidates outside it's own party that most closely follows our aims and goals for a free country.

In 2004, the Patriot Party gave Limited Candidate Endorsement for President Michael Peroutka of the Constitutional Party, for President.

Note: The Oregon Patriot Party had abstained from that endorsement.

Review the National American Patriot Party  website Forum and see who, why, and what Patriot Party members voting for.

See the Patriot Party solution to the two party monopoly, The Patriot Party is made up of registered Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats who wish to see the true intent of the founding fathers of this country realized. 

The two candidate voting system:

This system allows the voter to vote for the candidate he believes will be the best person for the job;

If that person does not get enough votes, his second choice is recorded.

This allows the voter to vote his conscience first without throwing away a crucial vote.

An example would be, if you believed Ron Paul was the best person for the job as president but did not want to loose a vote to another Republican Candidate that may or may be more poular  You would simply vote Ron Paul as your first choice and the more popular candidate for second choice;

If Ron Paul did not carry the votes necessary to be a contender, you would not loose anything;

 This is because  the second choice vote would automatically  engage and be counted that candidate.

This innovative voting system allows for greater options to vote your conscience.

          ------------

The American Patriot Party and Oregon Patriot Party, Championing the "No Names No Numbers Tax" System Bill;  The States Liberty Bill, Federal Government Patriot Tax System Reform Bill, Zoning Abolishment  Bill; The Private Person and Property Security Bill and the Freedom Responsibility Bill  which places the responsibility on every court and government agency at every level to have the power to refuse laws that it deems contrary to the Inalienable Rights guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence as intended by the founders letters and constitution of this country without reprimand by federal, state, county or other entity, thereby empowering the responsibility defined in the Declaration of Independence wherein it states clearly:

"That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that, whenever "any form" of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the "right" of "the people" to "alter" or to "abolish" it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness...

         --------------

Note, that when this was written, it did not mean within the constraints of the existing law or within the constraint of a government procedure such as a voting system, as they stood outside and apart from their own present government at that time, and had no legal government.

They were individuals making a stand.

This imposed a power of a people, any group of people; not of a, or any, government.

The Declaration of Independence defines

1.) a free individual his first right and duty and;

2.) 40 Definitions of a Tyrannical government in which to impose your first right and duty upon.

The Constitution's purpose is to fully,  in compliance with the Declaration of Independence's foundation, limit the powers of the Federal Government.

This is the sole purpose of the Constitution; and it does not, in any way, overwrite the foundations and duties laid out by the Declaration of Independence.

Clearly as written in the Constitution Article VI, that the Constitution is bound by prior Oaths which are Engagements of the People, declared in The Declaration of Independence, and all agreements set forth in the Confederation; All those and future laws subject ultimately to those oaths which are "Engagements" of and with the People presented in the Declaration of Independence, "Not Withstanding".

Constitution: Article VI: All Debts contracted "and "Engagements" entered into (Oaths and Declarations), before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution as under the "Confederation". This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be "made" in >>>"pursuance thereof"<<< ; and all Treaties (Oaths and Declarations) "made", or which shall be "made", under the Authority of the United States, shall be supreme Law of the Land ...."

Note that any law made under the Constitution is limited to laws within the "DELEGATED" Powers; The federal legislature - federal government cannot create laws outside those very limited delegated powers, nor can they "abrogate" any new powers. This is clearly defined by the Founders in the Constitutional Debates;

See the Full Day Debate that establishes this in our American Patriot Party News Letter - Division of Power.

Oregon State Political Campaign and American Patriot Party National Campaign Elections Division Headquarters.

Political State Parties of the American Patriot Party. The True Jefferson Democratic - Republican Party.

Oregon State Elections Division and State Election figures.


AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF THE INDEPENDENT AND UNITED STATES:

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ALABAMA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ALASKA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF AMERICAN SAMOA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ARIZONA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ARKANSAS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF CALIFORNIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF COLORADO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF CONNECTICUT

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF DELAWARE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF FLORIDA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF GEORGIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF GUAM

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF HAWAII

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF IDAHO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ILLINOIS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF INDIANA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF IOWA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF KANSAS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF KENTUCKY

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF LOUISIANA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MAINE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MARSHALL ISLANDS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MARYLAND

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MASSACHUSETTS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MICHIGAN

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MINNESOTA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MISSISSIPPI

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MISSOURI

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MONTANA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEBRASKA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEVADA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW JERSEY

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW MEXICO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW YORK

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NORTH CAROLINA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NORTH DAKOTA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF OHIO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF OKLAHOMA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF OREGON

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF PALAU

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF PUERTO RICO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF RHODE ISLAND

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF SOUTH CAROLINA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF SOUTH DAKOTA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF TENNESSEE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF TEXAS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF UTAH

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF VERMONT

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF VIRGIN ISLANDS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF VIRGINIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WASHINGTON

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WEST VIRGINIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WISCONSIN

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WYOMING

American Patriot.

American Patriot Party Serving National Campaign Headquarters. American Patriot Party.CC (Not associated with .org)

Socialism as Defined by the American Patriot Party

As socialism is a non descriptive generalization (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism), The American Patriot Party establishes a universal description; Not as a form of government or leadership, but as a condition that is obvious in the form of dependency; willing or unwilling.

Though dictators may have in history distanced themselves from the definition of socialism, the control over their people and their bureaucratic institutions would have no effect without the willing (or subjugated compliant) dependent bureaucracy. 

Socialism thereby, as defined by this party, is a condition of a country that begins when the percentage of  the willing (or subjugated compliant) bureaucracy dependent upon any government exceeds 5% of its citizenry.

Socialism in practice, as defined by this party, is the percentage of its citizenry reaching 8% or more, who accept and are dependent upon government for their income in any way, This includes, but is not limited to, direct employment, government contracts, retirement benefits.

These percentages are established in part by usury.

Socialism by willing subjugation (voluntary slavery), is when society as a whole, accepts such practice without revolt, reverse or immediate action to correct.

Socialism by this party is also a condition wherein certain, inalienable rights are jeopardized and corrupted by social propriety dictated by bureaucratic and or social born establishments.

Socialism of its root cause as concluded and as defined by this party, is the percentage of those dependent upon government or subjugated (willing or unwilling) by government in relationship to the percentage of  those who are not.

This definition precedes all definitions of government, government structure, socially established groups or political titles.

 

Socialism in the Form of Institutions

Socialism, as defined by this party, further relates to the similar operation of socialism by any government, or private entity, corporate, union, special interest, any combination of, or of other title.

If it operates like a socialism, it is socialism.

The extent of which if great enough in numbers of dependent citizens, can establish the definition of a independent socialist government operating in a free country.

In no way is a private "entity" or "group" of any type a individual, as fictionally attempted to be defined and presently practiced in "law".

These entities or groups are in fact social entities and social established groups in bureaucratic form and are not free enterprise;

This as free enterprise is not established or ordained by government or by its approval, such approvals which are in place exactly because of the collective power that these establishments, which are private social bureaucracies, fiscally, or cause driven and fiscally supported by distant masses, can possess over truly free enterprise found only in the individual;

And as having such powers are subject to strict limitations by federal, state and county laws, including, but not limited to, highly localized monopoly laws of counties. (see next regarding distant powers)


 

Socialism in the Form of Distant Collective Action and Powers
or Distant Legislatures

Socialism can be established by the action of special interest groups or other entity that through national, international or local lobbying or collective involvement nation wide by distant citizenry and through distant legislatures, controlling local issues over and against those citizens that will most directly effected; as if such distant national and international groups had arbitrary powers over individuals or local communities whose lives are most effected.

Socialism can be established through manipulation and bribery by federal government withholding of tax money already received from taxes unless the state or county abides by the will of the federal government which itself through international lobbying and treaties turns to inflict arbitrary powers of those agreements over states forcing them to inflict arbitrary laws over county, and county over local communities.

Such can be seen in highway funds, planning laws and environmental laws.

Rule by distant legislatures is not a feature of freedom and was opposed by the founders:

Rights of the Colonists 1772

"...Now what liberty can there be, where property is taken away without consent? Can it be said with any colour of truth and Justice, that this Continent of three thousand miles in length, and a breadth as yet unexplored, in which however, its supposed, there are five millions of people, has the least voice, vote or influence in the decisions of the British Parliament? Have they, all together, any more right or power to return a single member to that house of commons, who have not inadvertently, but deliberately assumed a power to dispose of their lives,8 Liberties and properties, than to choose an Emperor of China! Had the Colonists a right to return members to the british parliament, it would only be hurtfull; as from their local situation and circumstances it is impossible they should be ever truly and properly represented there. The inhabitants of this country in all probability in a few years will be more numerous, than those of Great Britain and Ireland together; yet it is absurdly expected [Volume 5, Page 397] by the promoters of the present measures, that these, with their posterity to all generations, should be easy while their property, shall be disposed of by a house of commons at three thousand miles distant from them; and who cannot be supposed to have the least care or concern for their real interest: Who have not only no natural care for their interest, but must be in effect bribed against it; as every burden they lay on the colonists is so much saved or gained to themselves. ..."

How closely our federal government has returned to the practice of tyranny as defined by and warned of by our Originating Founders..

Socialism in the Form of Total Democracy

Total Democracy, that is, democracy that is not subject to, or has no basis of unchangeable certain, inalienable, rights, is socialism.

Total Democracy is not freedom, Total Democracy is mob rule. as it offers no such protections guaranteed by freedom;

A Country's citizenry  which is ran by a Total Democracy, are societal whim and arbitrarily ruled subjects;

Not free citizens.

These subjects are the product found of every subjugated country on earth by way of willing and voluntary slavery.

Socialism by willing subjugation (voluntary slavery), is when society as a whole, accepts such practice without revolt, reverse or immediate action to correct.

The feature of certain inalienable rights is necessary for any country to consider itself free; of which only one country in the world at this time, The United States of America, possesses; However waning and in need of repair it is.

All other falsely acclaimed "countries of a free world"  such as Britain, are just that, falsely acclaimed; This, as rights are not rights in these countries but privileges; privileges that can be voted or taken away at any moment by their own social bureaucracies.

This was very clear to the founders:

James Madison:

"...The governments of Europe are afraid to trust the people with arms.

If they did, the people would surely shake off the yoke of tyranny, as America did.

Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors."

The citizens of Britain remain, today as well as then, as with all other nations of the world, except the United States, debased subjects of arbitrary power.

Nothing has changed and modern situations do not alter it.

Modern appliances and health care do not remove this fact, which is based on servitude of a citizen to his government bureaucracy's will and subjugation by an arbitrary power that suppresses certain, inalienable rights;

Such a ridiculous reasoning like that, would be like giving a slave a clean shirt and dental care so long as he did what his master said and stayed and worked quietly in his master's yard;

 A peace and prosperity only by and through subjugation and pacification.


 Rights of the Colonists 1772:

"First, "The first fundamental positive law of all Commonwealths or States, is the establishing the legislative power; as the first fundamental natural/law also, which is to govern even the legislative power itself, is the preservation of the Society."6

"Secondly, The Legislative has no right to absolute arbitrary power over the lives and fortunes of the people:..."

" Thirdly, The supreme power cannot Justly take from any man, any part of his property without his "consent", in person or by his Representative

These are some of the first principles of natural law & Justice, and the "great Barriers" of all "free states",..."

Simply being associated with the United States in trade or treaty does not entitle socialist countries such as Britain to fly banners or descriptions that associate them with freedom;

Such banner is reserved only for those who respect, practice and protect at all levels, those certain, inalienable, rights defined by the Originating Founders, against those defined tyrannies so listed in part within the Grievances of the Declaration of Independence.

Our own Federal, State and County government servants should take note.